Science PROVES NPCs ARE REAL, Some People DONT THINK AT ALL, We Call Them Democrats

Author: Greyparrot
FBI
FJB

Posts

Total: 51
Topic's author
#1
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,993
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10

If you ever struggle to understand why things are the way they are and why life is so terribly frustrating, remember that 50% of the population don't even have an inner monologue and they get to vote too.

Jordan Peterson talks about this, in the sense that when you think in your own head, you’re allowing yourself to practice ideas that are dangerous or unsuccessful, thus allowing the ideas to internally die rather than killing yourself with external experimentation. 


This is the article behind the science.
#2
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,662
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
Actually, there is a difference between thinking and copying.

Most people just copy what others say.

For example, I just copy what anime has taught me. I dont actually think.
Topic's author
#3
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,993
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Best.Korea
This isn't what the discussion is about. Some people have internal voices. The other half of the world thinks having internal voices makes you crazy.
#4
FishChaser
FishChaser's avatar
Debates: 77
Posts: 234
2
4
6
FishChaser's avatar
FishChaser
2
4
6
-->
@Greyparrot
Republicans are the ones more likely to believe in a magic sky fairy who says genocide is good when the Israelites did it but pleasure is bad.
Topic's author
#5
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,993
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@FishChaser
So you agree with the Science article?
Topic's author
#6
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,993
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Best.Korea
The 5 main ways of thinking:
  • Inner speaking/ inner monologue -  Ex. talking to yourself, hearing your voice or someone else or audibly recalling a phone number.
  • Inner seeing/ visual imagery - Thoughts with a visual symbol. Ex. picturing a memory or a place you wish you lived.
  • Feelings - A conscious experience of emotional process. Ex. feeling sad after the death of a loved one. 
  • Unsymbolized thinking - No word or image associated with thoughts. Ex. pouring your morning coffee without telling yourself to. 
  • Sensory awareness-  Paying attention to a sensory aspect of the environment for an unimportant reason. Ex. hearing someone talk but seeing the light reflecting off their glasses. 
According to Hulburt, not many people have an inner monologue 100 per cent of the time, but most do sometimes. He estimates that inner monologue is a frequent thing for 30 to 50 per cent of people.

#7
HistoryBuff
HistoryBuff's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,222
3
3
3
HistoryBuff's avatar
HistoryBuff
3
3
3
-->
@Greyparrot
Jordan Peterson talks about this, in the sense that when you think in your own head, you’re allowing yourself to practice ideas that are dangerous or unsuccessful, thus allowing the ideas to internally die rather than killing yourself with external experimentation. 
1) jordan peterson is a lunatic. Starting any sentence with Jordan Peterson talks about" is a pretty good way to get any thoughtful person to just tune you out because you obviously don't have anything interesting to say. 

2) you are conflating a monologue with thought. Which is not what they are talking about at all. Some people think about things without hearing it as words. Some people need to use words in their own head to organize their thoughts. Neither means that aren't thinking or capable of thought. 
Topic's author
#8
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,993
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@HistoryBuff
Jordan peterson is a lunatic. Starting any sentence with Jordan Peterson talks about" is a pretty good way to get any thoughtful person to just tune you out because you obviously don't have anything interesting to say. 

This is what I was alluding to in post #3
#9
HistoryBuff
HistoryBuff's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,222
3
3
3
HistoryBuff's avatar
HistoryBuff
3
3
3
-->
@Greyparrot
This isn't what the discussion is about. Some people have internal voices. The other half of the world thinks having internal voices makes you crazy.
you said this, but you also said this:

Jordan Peterson talks about this, in the sense that when you think in your own head, you’re allowing yourself to practice ideas that are dangerous or unsuccessful, thus allowing the ideas to internally die rather than killing yourself with external experimentation. 

these two paragraphs are not talking about the same thing. One points out that people have a hard time understand people who aren't like themselves. The other implies that one way of thinking is superior to the other. And jordan peterson is a lunatic. 
Topic's author
#10
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,993
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@HistoryBuff
They are though. Read the article if you are still confused.
#11
HistoryBuff
HistoryBuff's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,222
3
3
3
HistoryBuff's avatar
HistoryBuff
3
3
3
-->
@Greyparrot
 One points out that people have a hard time understand people who aren't like themselves. The other implies that one way of thinking is superior to the other. And jordan peterson is a lunatic. 
They are though. Read the article if you are still confused.
So your position is that the article thinks one way of thinking is superior to the other? Here are quotes from the article showing you didn't read it or understand it. The article is saying people have different ways of thinking and that the different ways have pros and cons. It is not saying one is better than the other. 

"Hulburt said having an inner monologue can make it easier for people to create a sequential plan and solve logical problems, but other ways of thinking have benefits too."

"People who don't have an active inner monologue can teach themselves to, Hulburt said. But he doesn't think it's necessarily a good or bad thing."

Topic's author
#12
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,993
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@HistoryBuff
You could interpret it as "superior" but the article doesn't have that binary choice in the analysis.

It simply explains why you would view Peterson as a crazy person.
#13
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,475
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@FishChaser
Republicans are the ones more likely to believe in a magic sky fairy who says genocide is good when the Israelites did it but pleasure is bad.
Let's say that the sky fairy is fake.  I am not sure that makes open borders and cutting off the penises of 9 year olds any less retarded. 
#14
FishChaser
FishChaser's avatar
Debates: 77
Posts: 234
2
4
6
FishChaser's avatar
FishChaser
2
4
6
-->
@WyIted
Neither of those things top Christianity's level of retarded.
#15
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,475
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@HistoryBuff
"Hulburt said having an inner monologue can make it easier for people to create a sequential plan and solve logical problems, but other ways of thinking have benefits too."

"People who don't have an active inner monologue can teach themselves to, Hulburt said. But he doesn't think it's necessarily a good or bad thing."
I am going to shock you with the next fact. 

Scientists are overwhelmingly pussies. This is a group of people who git wedgies in school and was given many a swirly. 

This means many of them will in fact choose to say things in a way that reduces their likelihood to offend. 

They aren't going to call being a human superior to being an NPC because they don't want to get a swirly. 

Thats why people like me are here to explain things to you as a type of interpretor to the needs. Its superior to have inner mobologue.  

While it can improve retrieval of facts to not have inner monologue it is literally how somebody who is spon fed ahit thinks. People that will never challenge the status quo . Idiots who will memorize long lists of facts but will never challenge them because of retard shut like 

"Just trust establishment be it the political establishment or political one because having the most common belief us the easiest way to be correct"
#16
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,475
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@FishChaser
Christianity tells you to not steal or lie or fuck your neighbors wife. This seems less retarded than cutting your kids dick off
#17
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,475
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
Let me guess Christianity is against gay sex and that is bad. 

Sorry that in a time we're disease was way less treatable that they created laws to prevent disease. 
#18
FishChaser
FishChaser's avatar
Debates: 77
Posts: 234
2
4
6
FishChaser's avatar
FishChaser
2
4
6
-->
@WyIted
Christianity is the least rational of any religion. For example it claims God is his own son and someone different at the same time. 

But rationality aside, Christian morality is the most backwards shit on the planet. Yaweh supports genocide, slavery, rape, stoning gays, any atrocity you can think of, but also has a bizarre and pointless hatred of hedonism. There are literal commiters of genocide in heaven and people who are sent to hell because they liked to have sex for fun.

You can't justify stoning gays because it "prevents disease" nor can you deny that it was done out of being a bunch of judgmental Christian cunts more than anything. The Bible says that being gay is perverse and sinful, doesn't say anything about it spreading disease

Christians often admit that they would be amoral without God, that morality comes from the authority of God and without God we are "chemical accidents" with no moral value. In other words a Christian is someone with no empathy or in-built sense of morality that derives their morality from an appeal to authority and that authority happens to be an imaginary friend who says that pure evil can be good because he says so but pleasure is bad.
#19
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,475
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@FishChaser
Christianity is the least rational of any religion. For example it claims God is his own son and someone different at the same time.
Literally the same claim in hermetically but applies to more people. 

You can't justify stoning gays because it "prevents disease" nor can you deny that it was done out of being a bunch of judgmental Christian cunts more than anything. The Bible says that being gay is perverse and sinful, doesn't say anything about it spreading disease

It is no more a sexual orientation than pedophilia.it isn't wrong. 

Christians often admit that they would be amoral without God, that morality comes from the authority of God and without God we are "chemical accidents" with no moral value. In other words a Christian is someone with no empathy or in-built sense of morality that derives their morality from an appeal to authority and that authority happens to be an imaginary friend who says that pure evil can be good because he says so but pleasure is bad.
Let's imagine God is evil. It's literally none of your business because ultimately he decides morality not you. 

The pleasure is bad principle is also I other philosophies that you ignore. Stoicism and Buddhism for example says that you should try to avoid excessive pleasure becauseit helps you avoid excessive pain. 

You can't tell me fucking a bus fool of supermodels wouldn't lead to you thinking normal sex was boring and less fun for your entire life. 

Let's get back to objective morality based on God. 

We know that morality is objective not subjective so why are moral principles such as "never torture a baby for fun" so universal and who gave us these morals or how did we all coincidentally intuit the same exact moral code? 
#20
FishChaser
FishChaser's avatar
Debates: 77
Posts: 234
2
4
6
FishChaser's avatar
FishChaser
2
4
6
-->
@WyIted
Literally the same claim in hermetically but applies to more people. 
Does "hermetically" contradict itself 100000 times?



It is no more a sexual orientation than pedophilia.it isn't wrong. 
What?


Let's imagine God is evil. It's literally none of your business because ultimately he decides morality not you. 

You are contradicting yourself, you said that we intuit certain universal moral principles but these principles are based on not bringing harm to others. God says it's ok to bring harm to others and be cruel in situations where people who actually have moral intuition would say it's wrong.

I fail to see the difference between this appeal to authority and saying that Hitler says Jews should be exterminated therefore exterminating Jews is good. 



The pleasure is bad principle is also I other philosophies that you ignore. Stoicism and Buddhism for example
Stoics and buddhists don't support genocide typically.



You can't tell me fucking a bus fool of supermodels wouldn't lead to you thinking normal sex was boring and less fun for your entire life. 
Who cares even if that's true?



We know that morality is objective not subjective
What is objective is that certain actions bring unnecessary harm. God is the source of all unnecessary harm, and trust me there's a lot of it, therefore God is evil. Any morality that doesn't say God is evil is an arbitrary appeal to authority or subjective values because the point of morality is to reduce unnecessary harm and promote the greatest good for all beings.
#21
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,475
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@FishChaser
Does "hermetically" contradict itself 100000 times?
Yes

As does the DSM5 despite it still being useful.

What?
You heard me and we can debate it. Pedophilia is as much of a sexual orientation as homosexuality and thus saying homosexuality is good based merely on the fact it is a sexual orientation is wrong.

What is objective is that certain actions bring unnecessary harm. God is the source of all unnecessary harm, and trust me there's a lot of it, therefore God is evil.
Are you making an antinatalist argument because if you are saying unnecessary harm/pain is bad and you say genocide that actually prevents those genocide from additional pain is wrong, than maybe it is you who is contradicting yourself. 
#22
FishChaser
FishChaser's avatar
Debates: 77
Posts: 234
2
4
6
FishChaser's avatar
FishChaser
2
4
6
As does the DSM5 despite it still being useful.
Are you sure this is contradiction, or is it overlapping symptoms from different disorders?

 

 Pedophilia is as much of a sexual orientation as homosexuality and thus saying homosexuality is good based merely on the fact it is a sexual orientation is wrong.
Pedophilia is wrong because it is inherently harmful, homosexuality is not wrong because it is not inherently harmful. 


Are you making an antinatalist argument 
God could have made everything happy, safe and peaceful but he chose to make a world full of death and suffering.
#23
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,475
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@FishChaser
Pedophilia is wrong because it is inherently harmful, homosexuality is not wrong because it is not inherently harmful. 
What if there was a study showing victims of pedophilia had better long term happiness than those who are not molested?

Does it make it alright then ir are the societal impacts what is important and the inherent degeneracy the real problem
#24
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@WyIted
Scientists are overwhelmingly pussies. This is a group of people who git wedgies in school and was given many a swirly. 

This means many of them will in fact choose to say things in a way that reduces their likelihood to offend. 

They aren't going to call being a human superior to being an NPC because they don't want to get a swirly. 
Some do respond to trauma this way but others get ferocious and super brave in ways you seem incapable to comprehend.
#25
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,475
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
I know. Elliot Roger's got really ferocious and brave and died for what he believed in. 
#26
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,662
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@FishChaser
Pedophilia is wrong because it is inherently harmful
I agree in some cases, but "harmful" and "should be punished" arent exactly one and same.

Tobacco is harmful and kills people, yet you dont see anyone saying "arrest all tobacco people".

And second-hand smoke is horrible.

There are plenty of things which are harmful.

It doesnt translate into "yeah we should really hate those people like they are our mortal enemies".
#27
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,662
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@FishChaser
I really suggest that you watch World Conquest Zvezda Plot.

Twice if possible.

It will guide you towards the light.
#28
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,662
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
You can even get addicted to second hand smoke.
#29
FishChaser
FishChaser's avatar
Debates: 77
Posts: 234
2
4
6
FishChaser's avatar
FishChaser
2
4
6
-->
@WyIted
I highly doubt that being raped makes people happier.

Also "degeneracy" really just means "I don't like it because it isn't what us normal Christian folks do"
#30
FishChaser
FishChaser's avatar
Debates: 77
Posts: 234
2
4
6
FishChaser's avatar
FishChaser
2
4
6
-->
@Best.Korea
Is there a place I can watch it for free without getting 50 different viruses?