Study shows Republicans are more likely to be deaf and dumb

Author: IwantRooseveltagain

Posts

Total: 87
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@Greyparrot
Stop dodging the question like a coward.

Do you believe that taxes on the globalist elites should be raised?

A Yes or No is sufficient.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,052
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@TheUnderdog
It's not a dodge. Why do you think the rich oppose a flat tax?
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@Greyparrot
Why do you think the rich oppose a flat tax?
The left wing ones oppose it because they believe they (and other billionaires) should be forced to help the poor.  They donate a lot of money on their own (they would have to in order to not be a hypocrite).

The right wing ones want lower taxes for themselves.

But a billionaire can say rape should be illegal and rape should still be illegal.  It doesn't matter who says a claim.  What matters is it's accuracy.

Do you believe that the rich should have to pay more in taxes?  Yes or no.

I would expect a teacher to actually answer the question; I would assume your degree made you smarter, especially since higher taxes means there is more money for their salary (assuming public school teacher).
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@TheUnderdog
I would expect a teacher to actually answer the question;
He’s not a real teacher. Teachers are busy all day every day. GP is on DART at all during school hours.

At best, he’s a seldom called substitute teacher 
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,052
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@TheUnderdog
You didn't answer my question.
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Yeah, he should get a job.

I don't like it when people on welfare talk about how bad socialism and free stuff from the government are.  Lead by example.  At least Harlem welfare recipients aren't hypocrites.  You are!
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@Greyparrot
I believe I did.  Your question was:

Why do you think the rich oppose a flat tax?
And I said the left wing rich people oppose a flat tax because they are patriots and want to help their country fiscally.

But Roosevelt is saying you don't get many hours as an out of college sub teacher.  You don't get to talk about how bad socialism is when it keeps you alive.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,052
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@TheUnderdog
You don't know anything about me. If you are here to troll, you can join the ignore list.
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
Greyparrot has blocked me.  Pretty much what you can expect from many (not all, but many) free speech advocates on the right, greyparrot included.

You don't know anything about me.

Well, what did I get wrong?

 If you are here to troll, you can join the ignore list.
It's not trolling; it's asking questions.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,052
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
Well, what did I get wrong?

What you got wrong is that you are asking the kinds of questions Roose asks in order to doxx people, find out where they really work so he can get them fired. Why do you think I ignore him? My job isn't worth any kind of internet victory with an anonymous person. Especially a crazy and unstable larper like roose. If you want to go down that road, you can travel it alone.
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@TheUnderdog
Well, what did I get wrong?
You didn’t get anything wrong. He’s a lonely, lonely guy, no wife, no kids, never kissed a girl. He works infrequently as a substitute teacher. 

He’s too ashamed to tell how little he has accomplished so he tries to explain his evasive behavior with bogus concerns of doxxing.

find out where they really work so he can get them fired.
Here he admits his wack job beliefs could get him in trouble with normal society 


TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
What you got wrong is that you are asking the kinds of questions Roose asks in order to doxx people, find out where they really work so he can get them fired. Why do you think I ignore him? My job isn't worth any kind of internet victory with an anonymous person.
I don't know your real name and neither does Roose.

I wasn't asking where you worked, I was asking if you have a job where you sustain yourself free from government aid.

Especially a crazy and unstable larper like roose.
This is a fair assessment of Roose.  He plays a stereotypical Boston, Massachusetts person.
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
He’s a lonely, lonely guy, no wife, no kids, never kissed a girl.
I don't see the issue with being unmarried, unkissed, and childless.  If that's what he is into, it is what it is.

Here he admits his wack job beliefs could get him in trouble with normal society 
That's honestly true about pretty much everyone on DART.

If I said at work what I said on DART for long enough, then I would get fired.  The same is true for GP; the same is true for you.

You think people at work are going to like you insulting people you don't like for not having kids and being unmarried?
Amber
Amber's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 389
1
2
6
Amber's avatar
Amber
1
2
6
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
-->
@<<<Amber>>>
repetitive pay for play (Ukraine & China), treasonous behavior/policies regarding the border resulting in a Bonafide invasion, influence pedaling, 
1)Are you talking about the millions Jared Kushner got from Saudi Arabia to hook them up with Trump?
2) An invasion? How many tanks and artillery pieces did they use to invade?
3) What did Biden do for money? Who paid him?
1) pure deflection with a red herring fallacy. See. Your argument holds no water.
2) more defection with a patronizing smart ass retort. See. Your argument holds no water.
3) his financial crimes are common knowledge, they're even on the government website. You refuse to acknowledge it. See. Your argument holds no water. 

Obama: racial division, Solyndra (money laundering), Obamacare, Political profiling by the IRS, DAVA and PACA, etc. 
1) Racial division? Was Obama born in this country?
2) Because Trump told us he didn’t believe he was? He said he found amazing things in Hawaii, but then …nothing.
3) Solyndra money laundering? Please explain because I don’t think you know what you’re talking about.
4)The IRS was led by a guy chosen by Bush. They were investigating TEA BAGGERS abusing the IRS code, posing as “Social welfare” groups when they were actually engaged in political fundraising.
1) pure deflection with a red herring fallacy. See. Your argument holds no water.
2) ignoratio elenchi retort. See, your argument holds NO water.
4) Lies. IRS targeting controversy - Wikipedia Do you research before opening your mouth. 

Amber
Amber's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 389
1
2
6
Amber's avatar
Amber
1
2
6
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
->
@<<<Amber>>>
Making a phone call? 
You forgot to say perfect phone call. But Trump had called to bribe or extort Zelensky for help for his political campaign 
Lies.

Making a phone call is not "high crimes or misdemeanors."
Abuse of power and extortion definitely are
Lies.

Impeachment for what? The fallacious claim of inciting an insurrection? He was acquitted of that.
And OJ was acquitted of murdering his ex-wife. So he’s innocent right? And that impeachment “jury” of Republican, totally credible, right?
The Senate majority leader, MCCONNELL said Trump should be prosecuted but he voted to acquit Trump on the technicality that he was no longer President.
Deflection with a red herring fallacy. 

I do not care what he did where the draft is concerned. Children of wealthy and influential people often didn't have to comply with the draft. Your argument holds no water.
Is that because you’re a woman and nobody expects a woman to serve in the military. They are to weak..
Sexist much? More deflection. Your arguments still hold no water. You're all deflection and no substance. 

Cheating on his taxes? Please. His CPAs are filing his taxes and using what the government gave them (loop holes) to utilize. That's not cheating.
His company was found guilty of breaking the law on taxes. Apparently he went beyond the loopholes. His own  sister and niece  said so.

The Trump family has a long history of tax evasion and deceptive business practices

Vox? LOL! Doesn't surprise me you would pick that grossly leftist biased and uncredible source to argue with. 

Thanks for proving all your arguments hold NO water. 
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,052
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Amber
Thanks for proving all your arguments hold NO water. 

You are going to discover this guy only uses WAPO and Vox for all sources cited.
Amber
Amber's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 389
1
2
6
Amber's avatar
Amber
1
2
6
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
-->
@<<<Amber>>>
Cheats on his wives? So what! No human being is perfect. JFK cheated. RFK cheated. MLK Jr cheated. Clinton cheated. 
So the Republican Party is no longer the party of family values and Christian religion? 
Deflection with more condescension. Proves your argument holds no water. 

Trump did not personally pay anyone hush money. His lawyer paid her with his money. That case with her went away. Digging it up with some legal fandangling is political grandstanding and election interference.
Yes he did genius. Having his lawyer pay and then paying his lawyer back (the checks have been made public by his lawyer) is no difference.

The trial is set for March 25 genius. You don’t know what you’re talking about.
When your lawyer sends you a bill, you pay it. 
When your electric company sends you a bill, you pay it. 
When your doctor sends you a bill, you pay it. 
Paying a bill is not an admission of guilt of anything, non-genius! 
Her attorney is in jail. She paid him $120,000 in legal fees for a failed defamation case. 
Hannity and Trump's attorney exposes the election interference of this case: https://youtu.be/r-4u9Yqny7c?si=TMbo5HGjnmOriYE_
No, you do not know what you are talking about. 
Your argument still holds NO water.

Lies? Well JFC! The sky is falling!! Oh, wait!!! Every single person alive on the planet lies. YOU LIE! We all lie. That is not a job disqualification for POTUS let alone Congress.
So lying is perfectly fine in the Republican Party. Ok. Is there a difference to you if someone lies once or twice in 4 years or lies 30,000 times? Is it the same in your little pea brain?

YOUR BRAIN HOLDS NO FACTS
More deflection. More condescending and pretentious demeanor cause you clearly are too illiterate and ignorant to make an actual argument supported by fact based evidence. So you do what you so often accuse others of doing: lying. 
Your arguments have been conclusively proven baseless, an empty water bucket. 
You're dismissed.
Amber
Amber
Amber's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 389
1
2
6
Amber's avatar
Amber
1
2
6
-->
@Greyparrot
@IwantRooseveltagain
-->
@<<<Amber>>>
Thanks for proving all your arguments hold NO water. 

You are going to discover this guy only uses WAPO and Vox for all sources cited.
No surprise. Two of the worst sources to fall back on.

Clearly, he is still has no water since he hasn't replied any further, knowing full well that his bucket is full of holes. 
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,052
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Amber
He also likes to doxx people, so do not tell him what you actually do or where you live.
Amber
Amber's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 389
1
2
6
Amber's avatar
Amber
1
2
6
-->
@Greyparrot
-->
@<<<Amber>>>
He also likes to doxx people, so do not tell him what you actually do or where you live.
When people try to do such insidious things, they prove/demonstrate that they are ill-equipped to have civil discourse/discussions/debates and defend their own position. And when proven wrong with no measure of intelligence to defend their position, or integrity to admit they are wrong, they resort to such devious tactics. Little man children they are. Childish behavior being caught with their hand in the cookie jar of stupid arguments that they cannot defend. Lashing out against those who proved them wrong, again, childish. 

It's because of people like him that makes sites like this toxic. 

I know I am new here, but (wo)man, I am inclined to leave if there is no one with a modicum of decency and integrity to have a civil discussion on any topic, regardless of how controversial it may, or may not be. 

Amber 
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@Amber
pure deflection with a red herring fallacy.
I noticed MAGA MORONS love to use the term fallacy. There’s nothing red herring about the 2 billion Kushner got from the Saudis.

You are going to discover this guy only uses WAPO and Vox for all sources cited.
That’s bullshit. But watch out for GP. He’s a very, very lonely guy.

Deflection with more condescension. Proves your argument holds no water.
Well you deserve condescension because you’re a dummy, My argument that Trump cheats on everything including his wives is not disputed, but it is ignored by the MAGA MORONS 

Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,052
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Amber
It's because of people like him that makes sites like this toxic. 

Well, that's a decision the moderators have to make.

Little man children they are.
Yep.
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
Yep
Aww, GP has found a soulmate. 2 MAGA MORONS sittin in a tree…but GP would never be  k-I-s-s-I-n-g

IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@Amber
He also likes to doxx people, so do not tell him what you actually do or where you live.
What he means by that is I will make fun of you if you haven’t done anything with your life…if you’re a social outcast…you know, a loser.

Trump likes to call people losers so I’m sure you’re fine with that, right?

Amber
Amber's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 389
1
2
6
Amber's avatar
Amber
1
2
6
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
-->
@<<<Amber>>>
pure deflection with a red herring fallacy.
I noticed MAGA MORONS love to use the term fallacy. There’s nothing red herring about the 2 billion Kushner got from the Saudis.

To which of the many ignorant retorts that you provided with a red herring fallacy are you specifically retorting to here? 
Don't be unclear about it, be clear about it. 
Using actual logical 'fallacies' in rebuttal to impotent erectile dysfunctional men is neither MAGA or MORON.
But please, keep proving how limp you are with your arguments that hold no water, dear. It truly is humorous. 

You are going to discover this guy only uses WAPO and Vox for all sources cited.
That’s bullshit. But watch out for GP. He’s a very, very lonely guy.
That was not my statement; but then again, I wouldn't expect you to be consistent or clear in anything. 
Do not know of any "GP"?
If you are referring to GreyParrot, again, do not know him personally or otherwise. 
Your assessment of him holds no water. As does anything else you drivel onto these pages.

Deflection with more condescension. Proves your argument holds no water.
Well you deserve condescension because you’re a dummy, My argument that Trump cheats on everything including his wives is not disputed, but it is ignored by the MAGA MORONS 

Do you even read (or hear in your head) the tripe you post?

"Well (sic) you deserve condescension because you're a dummy."

LOL! Your demeanor via your choice of words speak for themselves. 

And I already proved you wrong the cheating wives thing. Many politicians have. Selective whining/crying/b*tching about who cheats on who is asinine. If it doesn't interfere with their ability to effectuate the job, I could care less if he has 15 hookers on retainer. We need a leader. Not your senile ice cream licking, child groping, hair sniffing, pedo dementia lunatic sleeping in the oval office because he missed nappy time. 

Aww, GP has found a soulmate. 2 MAGA MORONS sittin in a tree…but GP would never be  k-I-s-s-I-n-g
See, you keep proving what a manchild you are. Pure pre-teen behavior when you cannot defend your position with actual intelligence. 
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@Amber
I know I am new here, but (wo)man, I am inclined to leave if there is no one with a modicum of decency and integrity to have a civil discussion on any topic,
Really?

Your argument holds no water
And this is your idea of civil discussion, integrity, and decency?

You posted an article from The Atlantic and declared  “fact” 70% of black women get pregnant out of wedlock. That was not true.

Integrity? No

IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@Amber
Using actual logical 'fallacies' in rebuttal to impotent erectile dysfunctional men 
Is this you being civil toots?

Amber
Amber's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 389
1
2
6
Amber's avatar
Amber
1
2
6
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
-->
@<<<Amber>>>
He also likes to doxx people, so do not tell him what you actually do or where you live.
What he means by that is I will make fun of you if you haven’t done anything with your life…if you’re a social outcast…you know, a loser.

Trump likes to call people losers so I’m sure you’re fine with that, right?

Yeah, because you have no life and enjoy personally attacking anyone you disagree with by using very immature juvenile responses with garbage jargon showing/proving to everyone at this site what a toxic person you are. 

Based on what I have seen of you so far at this site, this is how I see you in real life:

Amber
Amber's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 389
1
2
6
Amber's avatar
Amber
1
2
6
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
->
@<<<Amber>>>
Using actual logical 'fallacies' in rebuttal to impotent erectile dysfunctional men 
Is this you being civil toots?

You Reap what you Sow

Galatians 6: 7-8
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@Amber
That was not my statement; but then again, I wouldn't expect you to be consistent or clear in anything.
Do not know of any "GP"?
GP is the guy you have been conversing with here on this thread toots.