GP is white trash.
He’s a middle-aged white guy who has the education level, career path, and earning power more typically experienced by minorities and immigrants
A Cure for TDS?
Posts
Total:
95
IWRA: We didn’t vote for ignorance, racism, and bigotry.IWRA: We complain about white trash who ...
GP is white trash.
He’s a middle-aged white guy who has the education level, career path, and earning power more typically experienced by minorities and immigrants
What a loser
[IwantRooseveltagain] Is someone who lives all alone since his mother died and has never been with a woman a weirdo? [https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/10369/posts/422851][ADreamOfLiberty] Yea that crosses the line. [https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/10369/posts/422862][IwantRooseveltagain] You are so ridiculous. Saying a woman wanted to be raped is acceptable to you but making fun of an obnoxious loser who is inadequate with women is over the line. [https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/10369/posts/422866 ]
Is someone who lives all alone since his mother died and has never been with a woman a weirdo?
Thanks for reminding me, GP is white trash and a weirdo
No wonder he is seldom called to work as a substitute teacher and lives all alone.
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Well, Pastor Marcus Lamb and his wife had dinner with Trump and Melania in the White House. He latter died from COVID.
[IwantRooseveltagain] Is someone who lives all alone since his mother died and has never been with a woman a weirdo? [https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/10369/posts/422851][ADreamOfLiberty] Yea that crosses the line. [https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/10369/posts/422862][IwantRooseveltagain] You are so ridiculous. Saying a woman wanted to be raped is acceptable to you but making fun of an obnoxious loser who is inadequate with women is over the line. [https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/10369/posts/422866 ]
Thanks for reminding me, GP is white trash and a weirdo
No wonder he is seldom called to work as a substitute teacher and lives all alone.
[IwantRooseveltagain] Is someone who lives all alone since his mother died and has never been with a woman a weirdo? [https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/10369/posts/422851][ADreamOfLiberty] Yea that crosses the line. [https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/10369/posts/422862][IwantRooseveltagain] You are so ridiculous. Saying a woman wanted to be raped is acceptable to you but making fun of an obnoxious loser who is inadequate with women is over the line. [https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/10369/posts/422866 ]
NYC migrants: Suspected attackers of NYPD officers arrested in Arizona
So funny to see New York all of a sudden defend NY cops only after illegal invaders start beating their cops up.... because the only people allowed to fight with the cops should be American Democrats... lol....
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
I am not legally allowed to criticize the government because that's what nazis do isn't it.
The first amendment is the law. You are allowed to criticize Biden; many do; none go to jail for criticizing the US government.
Stop playing the victim.
-->
@TheUnderdog
Stop playing the victim.
I'd tell you to understand hyperbole but I guess you can't.
none go to jail for criticizing the US government.
Well they don't claim that's the reason, even though it is.
-->
@Double_R
It's thinking...
It's thinking the following are substantially true even though a few hours of independent research could debunk all of it:
that the guy who told over 30,000 lies in a 4 year term is the"truth teller".It's thinking that the guy who has nothing but scorn for all of our Democratic allies while having nothing but praise for all the world's dictators is the guy who values democracy and the rule of law.It's thinking that the guy who tried to steal an American election is the guy fighting for your right to choose your own leader.It's thinking that the guy who thought it might be a good idea to nuke a Hurricaine, that injecting bleach into the human body is an interesting idea to pursue, or that clean coal is when you take it out and scrub it with a brush... Is a genius who has the world figured out.It's thinking that the guy who watched as the US Capitol was breached by a mob on TV and did absolutely nothing about it for 3 hours is the guy who cares about protecting the nation.
I see IWRA has expanded his operations to include open racism. Is anyone surprised?
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Well they don't claim that's the reason, even though it is.
If a lot of people were being jailed for being Trump supporters, then it would make sense for the party that wants to let prisoners vote tend to run red states.
Instead, this is reality.
My ideal is either the Orange or light red; I don't know the difference between parole and probation.
Nobody gets jailed for supporting Trump.
Like you support Trump. Are you in jail? No.
The closest thing is Big Tech censorship.
Now, if one supports the free market deciding what's best, then they would be fine with the free market (aka Big Tech) censoring mainstream conservative viewpoints (not even racism; but mainstream conservatism) if that's how they maximized profit.
It would have also meant that when Ben Shapiro and similarly big Conservative influencers were small, then they would have been banned when they were young; not when they have more influence. Meaning, who would tell you that Big Tech is censoring them? Nobody would.
The fact that conservative influencers can tell you that Big Tech is censoring them is evidence that they aren't being censored.
-->
@TheUnderdog
Well they don't claim that's the reason, even though it is.If a lot of people were being jailed for being Trump supporters
One is too many, because one is enough to put fear into the rest.
Now, if one supports the free market deciding what's best, then they would be fine with the free market (aka Big Tech) censoring mainstream conservative viewpoints
An argument that breaks down rather quickly when you see evidence that Big Tech is being directed in their censorship by the government and have government agents infesting their high ranks.
If that is the tip, the iceberg is vast and there is no shortage of things the federal and state governments can use as threats.
Meaning, who would tell you that Big Tech is censoring them? Nobody would.
To censor without the ability to cut off people's internet is a balancing act. Too harsh and you bifurcate the audience (as has nearly happened several times). Too soft and you don't affect the public mood as much as you could.
The lack of instant blanket bans is expected and disproves nothing.
The fact that conservative influencers can tell you that Big Tech is censoring them is evidence that they aren't being censored.
No if they've bypassed Big Tech using their own servers, which almost all major or controversial ones have.
-->
@Double_R
8 U.S. Code § 1325 - Improper entry by alien(a) Improper time or place; avoidance of examination or inspection; misrepresentation and concealment of factsAny alien who (1) enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers, or (2) eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers, or (3) attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact, shall, for the first commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both, and, for a subsequent commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.I'm not seeing how the existing law would fix the problem. It doesn't say he can deport them or turn them away, it says he can at most imprison them, and btw our jails are full.And then there's this little tid bit...a)Authority to apply for asylum(1)In generalAny alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival and including an alien who is brought to the United States after having been interdicted in international or United States waters), irrespective of such alien’s status, may apply for asylum in accordance with this section or, where applicable, section 1225(b) of this title.(B)Time limitSubject to subparagraph (D), paragraph (1) shall not apply to an alien unless the alien demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that the application has been filed within 1 year after the date of the alien’s arrival in the United States.I'm no immigration lawyer but it sounds a bit more complicated than your little video made it sound.
Well maybe we just need to read a little more and a little more carefully.
(iii) Removal without further review if no credible fear of persecution(I) In generalSubject to subclause (III), if the officer determines that an alien does not have a credible fear of persecution, the officer shall order the alien removed from the United States without further hearing or review....(III) Review of determinationThe Attorney General shall provide by regulation and upon the alien’s request for prompt review by an immigration judge of a determination under subclause (I) that the alien does not have a credible fear of persecution. Such review shall include an opportunity for the alien to be heard and questioned by the immigration judge, either in person or by telephonic or video connection. Review shall be concluded as expeditiously as possible, to the maximum extent practicable within 24 hours, but in no case later than 7 days after the date of the determination under subclause (I).(IV) Mandatory detentionAny alien subject to the procedures under this clause shall be detained pending a final determination of credible fear of persecution and, if found not to have such a fear, until removed.
So the 'solution' is pretty freaking simple:
Step 1. Tell the truth, asylum officers need to be allowed to determine what all reasonable people know: There is no credible fear of persecution for the reasons listed in immigration law as potential reasons for asylum status
Step 2. Limit the number of asylees that can be allowed. This is within POTUS executive authority. He could say that the number allowed is ZERO, at this instant
Step 3. Follow the law, after determining they are not in credible fear, hold them for no more than 7 days and then put them on the Mexican side of the border (if they came in legally), if they came in by swimming across a river or climbing a fence then hold them for 24 hours, fine them under title 18 (take all their money) and then dump them on the Mexican side of the border.
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
One is too many, because one is enough to put fear into the rest.
The city I live in is about as blue as NY State. There are people that fly the Trump flag and they don't get arrested.
An argument that breaks down rather quickly when you see evidence that Big Tech is being directed in their censorship by the government and have government agents infesting their high ranks.
These right wingers (if they agree with you), made this video in 2019; the government then was headed by Trump.
Is Trump censoring conservatives? Or are you just doing what you can to make your party's narrative fit?
To censor without the ability to cut off people's internet is a balancing act.
You can censor without turning off internet. Just ban them from YouTube before they become influential.
The Daily Wire was founded Aug 20, 2015.
If Big Tech wanted to censor the Daily Wire for being conservative, then the Daily Wire would have been banned Sept 20, 2015 or something like that. They wouldn't be censored a decade later when they have a lot of power.
No if they've bypassed Big Tech using their own servers, which almost all major or controversial ones have.
I don't think servers bypass a YouTube ban.
-->
@TheUnderdog
Yes I agree they have not locked up every single Trump supporter (or every single person critical of the government).One is too many, because one is enough to put fear into the rest.The city I live in is about as blue as NY State. There are people that fly the Trump flag and they don't get arrested.
Is Trump censoring conservatives?
Was Trump really the government? That's why we say "deep state". The person you elect is not necessarily the one wielding all (or even most) of the power.
Or are you just doing what you can to make your party's narrative fit?
I do what I can to make the evidence fit. Why did the government tell Facebook to censor people when Trump was president?
They wouldn't be censored a decade later when they have a lot of power.
It's dangerous to censor them when they have a lot of power (money and servers)
No if they've bypassed Big Tech using their own servers, which almost all major or controversial ones have.I don't think servers bypass a YouTube ban.
Of course they do. Just tell your audience to go to your servers (or servers not subject to censorship) instead of Youtube. Crowder, Dailywire, Tim Pool, Alex Jones, Dave Rubin and many more say just that.
Poor, middle aged white guy is a victim of racism. Life is so hard for the white man.
I’m a white guy, so I can make fun of white guys and white fragility and white trash who blame immigrants for their shortcomings in life.
That's why we say "deep state". The person you elect is not necessarily the one wielding all (or even most) of the power.
The deep state, lol.
Name 5 people who are members of the deep state.
Name 5 people who are members of the deep state.
John Bolton, Merrick Garland, Christopher Wray, Peter Strzok, Eric Swalwell, and David Weiss.
There are more known and it would all but impossible if the total of all known are anything but the tip of an iceberg.
As the Trump era has unfolded, the term “deep state” has come to mean something sinister to some on the far right. More than just signifying an impersonal, inept bureaucracy, it conjures a secretive illuminati of bureaucrats determined to sabotage the Trump agenda. Remember that Trump has an IQ of 73.
-->
@FLRW
Mencken loves the son-of-a-bitch too.
John Bolton, Merrick Garland, Christopher Wray, Peter Strzok, Eric Swalwell, and David Weiss.
So Trump picked John Bolton to be National Security Adviser
he appointed Christopher to be FBI Director, and he was approved by the Senate.
He must be pretty stupid, right?
Weiss was nominated by President Donald Trump to be United States Attorney for the United States District Court for the District of Delaware,
He must be pretty stupid, right?
That's more true than 99% of what the TDS afflicted like yourself say.
That's more true than 99% of what the TDS afflicted like yourself say.
That’s incoherent. But Trump hired all these deep state guys, right? Is Trump part of the deep state too or just too stupid to hire the right people?
[IwantRooseveltagain] Is someone who lives all alone since his mother died and has never been with a woman a weirdo? [https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/10369/posts/422851][ADreamOfLiberty] Yea that crosses the line. [https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/10369/posts/422862][IwantRooseveltagain] You are so ridiculous. Saying a woman wanted to be raped is acceptable to you but making fun of an obnoxious loser who is inadequate with women is over the line. [https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/10369/posts/422866 ]
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
I see IWRA has expanded his operations to include open racism. Is anyone surprised?
Not a soul. Not even the people who like what he says.