it is technically accurate for trumpanzees to say the election was rigged

Author: n8nrgim

Posts

Total: 36
Topic's author
#31
n8nrgim
n8nrgim's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,023
3
2
5
n8nrgim's avatar
n8nrgim
3
2
5
-->
@Sam_Flynn
you do realize that what you are doing is exactly how conspiracy theorists operate, even when they are wildly wrong, right? they find a random source that no one's ever heard of, then claim it's credible, and wont even consider that it's not credible, even when it's not. 

your argument is pathetic. 
#32
Sam_Flynn
Sam_Flynn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 121
0
2
4
Sam_Flynn's avatar
Sam_Flynn
0
2
4
-->
@n8nrgim
And so many theories you people claim are conspiratorial have eventually been proven factually accurate.

Can't claim it isn't credible without proving it.

Again, source isn't the issue. The content is.

Also, your psychological projection is duly noted. 
#33
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
your psychological projection is duly noted.
Greatest hits!

The LCPL is back!
#34
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,169
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@n8nrgim
but i need evidence from credible sources.
The bad guys are the ones with the evidence, that's why they burn it. A considerable amount of the data used to find fraud was from county-level voter registration API. APIs that the governments in question shut down immediately after learning it was being used to detect fraud.

How someone reacts to an investigation is itself evidence, especially when the opposite of a "right to privacy" exists. A duty for transparency is what the government has and nothing an American government does is more important than running an election. Trivia: Did you know Alex Jones 'lost' his case simply because he could/would not produce documents? How much more important is the operation of elections than how exactly Alex Jones spends his money?

A so called democracy where auditable data was not created when it should have been and hidden when it was being reviewed is akin to a doctor who hides X-rays from you when you ask to see them.

There may be many explanations, but none of them are tolerable.

I watched the election fraud trial for Kari Lake live. A high ranking official running the election lied on the stand (contradicted himself blatantly between one day and the next). The judge didn't care. The propagandist don't care.

Do you find court recordings credible? Do you find lies by election officials to be strong evidence? If the answers are yes I will try to find that recording.
#35
Double_R
Double_R's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 5,260
3
2
5
Double_R's avatar
Double_R
3
2
5
-->
@n8nrgim
but the fact remains that many enough govenors probably broke the law enough, to change the outcome of the election. in short, the election was rigged. 
This isn't a fact, it's a completely unsubstantiated presumption fueled by endless right wing propaganda. Election laws give state officials quite a bit of leeway to make decisions in emergency situations, that's why they were able to do it on the first place. I can hardly think of a more appropriate situation than a global pandemic that caused the entire country to shut down.

And again, these claims were all litigated and none of them got anywhere. If they were legitimate judges would have taken them and ruled appropriately.

But even if we accept your premise that election laws are violated, it still does not follow that the election was rigged. Changing election laws in an emergency without going through the proper process in order to ensure people can vote is not election rigging. This is like when 9/11 truthers claim it was an inside job, then when asked to prove it argue that Bush failed to react to the warning signs.

i also think the fact this sort of thing isn't talked about more, is evidence the media is bias.
No, it's evidence that they are using proper judgement in reporting facts, not falling into BS right wing propaganda. The election was not rigged, and election officials taking action to ensure their constituents can vote safely is not news.

#36
Double_R
Double_R's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 5,260
3
2
5
Double_R's avatar
Double_R
3
2
5
-->
@Greyparrot
One lasting legacy of partisan politics is that Democrats will forever be labeled conspiracy theorists for simply asking any question because that is how the term has been redefined and repurposed by the MSM. 
Why is the flag swaying back and forth if there's no wind? - Moon landing conspiracy theorist

Why did building 7 fall if it wasn't even hit by a plane? 9/11 conspiracy theorist

"Just asking questions" is the mantra of every conspiracy theorist. The problem is that  conspiracy theorists never have evidence to support their claims, so all they do is present arguments from ignorance. Then when pressed to explain what they think actually happened, they hide behind this mantra because as long as they're only asking questions they can  never be proven wrong.

It's not a sophisticated tactic but it's good enough to fool people who aren't sophisticated in their thinking. Particularly, people who have difficulty telling different things apart from each other, like someone for example who would pretend as if the MSM's recognition of unsophisticated actors pretending to engage in good faith conversation and calling it out is the same thing as repurposing the definition of a conspiracy theorist.