-->
@DebateArt.com
I disagree about "changing the wording of the topic, so the Instigator is always Pro."
I think changing the wording of the topic into a negative might (1) confuse some people, as I've observed on DDO, and (2) prevents the ability of the instigator to decide that they want to be on Con, use strategy which is uniquely applicable to being on the Con as opposed to being on the Pro, e.g., a counterplan that Pro doesn't anticipate in part 1.
I think an alternative would be doing what Edeb8 does -- allowing the instigator to pick the side but making Pro always go first, whether they're the instigator or the contender.