I am a radical left-winger who hates Jews and believes the rich should be killed and/or put in gulags

Punking shite is what

Counter vote bomb

I was unclear what Con was trying to convey or meant by 'troll'. It seems to me like Con intended there to insult Pro or to convey something about Pro that somehow related to the resolution. I'm just not sure, it seems like semantic games to me and badly executed at that. Gotta say this is poor conduct and S&G. I truly didn't understand what Con was trying to convey and the use of a colon in the last Round, it felt like an inverted run-on sentence, where he split it up and I just couldn't follow? Colons are meant to be used before lists, what was the list?

Not only does Con insult Pro, I feel he gish galloped, trying to overload Con with too much to handle. This adds to the conduct mark. I just couldn't grasp Con's points. They were poorly communicated and outright rude at times intended only to evoke reaction. Don't be so strange, Con, it makes normies like me struggle to grasp your cryptic but possibly intelligent points.

Pro uses himself as a primary source for his own urges, I feel like this was a great use of source and the argument that all men are created equal and the sexist connotation of one who truly believed in that disliking women adds to how radical an outlook Pro has. Con relies on second-hand sourcing and frankly was outright rude to assume he knew the inner workings and thoughts of Pro. Poor sourcing and arguments, Con.

Pro ff half of the debate, that's poor conduct