Is Calvinism True?
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 2 votes and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
No information
- n.The act of justifying.
- n.The condition or fact of being justified.
- n.Something, such as a fact or circumstance, that justifies: considered misgovernment to be a justification for revolution. See Synonyms at apology.
2. Conditional Election: God chose the elect based on their foreseen faith. He loves all men equally. God passed over no one; He gives everyone an equal chance to be saved. This is gleaned from I Timothy 2:4; II Peter 3:9; Matthew 18:14.
3. Universal Atonement: Christ died equally for all men, and paid a provisional price that made salvation possible for all, but guaranteed it for none.
4. Resistible Grace: Saving grace is resistible, for God does not overrule man’s free will. Man is born again after he believes, for faith and repentance are not gifts of God.
5. Falling from Grace: Believers may turn from grace and lose their salvation.
1 Timothy 2:4 says: "[God] will have all men to be saved, And to come unto the knowledge of the truth. "How could this be true if God selects only certain people to go to heaven? In fact, Why would he create certain people in the first place if he wasn't going to allow them to enter heaven? It makes no sense. In fact, It would entail controlling their free will:
John 14:6: "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. "So one has to choose Jesus in order to enter heaven. However, In the Calvinist view, We've already been selected to go to heaven. Why do we have to choose if God's chosen us already?Besides this, You're basically saying that God has condemned people to sin beyond their free will, But God hates sin more than anything else. So you're essentially saying that he created people to do something he hates and they can't control it.
2 Peter 3:9: "The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, As some understand slowness.Insteadhe is patient with you, Not wanting anyone to perish, But everyone to come to repentance. "Why would he have to be patient and wait if he had already chosen who goes to heaven and who doesn't? It simply wouldn't matter. In the Calvinist worldview, God has created people to go to hell simply because he can, But that completely goes against the God that the Bible preaches.
John 3:16: "For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son, That whosoever believeth on him should not perish, But have eternal life. "This says that God loves the entire world, And whoever believes in Jesus shall go to heaven and have eternal life, Not only those he supposedly hand-picked.Besides this, If we were pre-destined, There would be no point in missionaries or spreading the word, Because those who go to heaven will go regardless of whether they hear of Jesus or not and those who will go to hell will go whether they hear of Jesus or not.
1 Peter 3:15: "but sanctify Christ as Lord in your hearts, Always being ready to make a defense to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you, Yet with gentleness and reverence;"Why would we be called to minister to people who can't actually make a choice themselves?
Another point is that sin wouldn't matter at all, But look at Hebrews 10:16: "For if we go on sinning deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, There no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, "This shows how we can lose salvation, But that is not true in this Calvinist view.
A common Calvinist scripture is Ephesians 1:4-5. However, that view of it is not true. In 1:13 it specifically says: "And you also were included in Christ when you heard the message of truth, The gospel of your salvation. When you believed, You were marked in him with a seal, The promised Holy Spirit, "They were included in Christ when they believed, Also known as choosing. For more context, 1:1 says "Paul, An apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God, To God’s holy people in Ephesus, the faithful in Christ Jesus"
He is talking to Christians here: "The Calvinist contends that certain individuals were chosen before the world began and predestined to become believers, But that is simply not what the text says. Paul teaches that those “in Him” have been predestined to become “holy and blameless” and “to be adopted as sons, ” but he never says that certain individuals were predestined to believe in Christ. Paul is speaking of what “the faithful in Christ” (vs. 1) have been predestined to become, Not about God preselecting certain individuals before the foundation of the world to be irresistibly transformed into believers. "'
Acts 13:48 is usually used out of context to explain the Calvinistic point. If you look at the context of that scripture, It is a setting where there are Jewish people, and then there are Gentiles. God is giving his favor to the Gentiles and giving them a revelation because they have been humble and received his word. God simply chooses to spread his blessings through Israel.Acts 13:8:"Therefore, My friends, I want you to know that through Jesus the forgiveness of sins is proclaimed to you. 39 Through him everyone who believes is set free from every sin, A justification you were not able to obtain under the law of Moses. "This says that can get forgiveness if we believe, and it says everyone.
Another scripture used is 2 Thessalonians 2:13-14. However, Context tells us how Gentiles were continually condemned by Jews, And God was saying that Gentiles were included in his plan. Also, He says that he chose them through sanctification and belief of the truth, So if your view was correct, God would be controlling their wills and making them believe in him. However, We know this not to be true.
Galatians 2:20:
How does God hating sin create his will for some people to come to him and others not to?
"This again goes to irresistable grace and God showing his nature. God is showing in this passage how God is faithful and hisperscribed will is not wanting any to perish. His decreed will is acts 17:30. where he commands all men everywhere to repent, however the ones who are not elect will disobey this command. Has the bible said anywhere that God created man to not die and to not suffer? again you are looking at his perscribed will and assuming the authority of the decreed will."
Where is your proof that some people are not able to obey this command? Second, can you explain more about what you mean by the last sentence in this quote.
"The elect are the only ones who can believe on him, the rejected cannot do those things which please God, Things that please God are repentance and Faith."
So how does it make sense for God to stop some people from doing the things that please him and then to get mad at those people when they do what he made them to do, which is to not please him (in your view). The answer is that it doesn't make sense.
God has shown that he doesn't need word-by-mouth to communicate the gospel.
"This emphasis is the showing of their predestination which ephesians 1:4-5 doesn't show."
Could you explain what you mean?
"You want me to explain how God predestines us? by his spirit, he doesn't need control the will, he gives us the will to do what we do and he also holds us back from sin. psalms 19:13 "
Before I start, I would like to clarify that I am not Arminiast and I am strictly arguing against predestination.
I agree on 1, 2, and 4. For 3, I'm not sure what you mean when you say that Christ has not guaranteed salvation. If you mean he hasn't given it to everyone, then no, but if you mean that he only gives it to those that want and accept it, then yes. As for 5, I am still trying to figure out my opinion on that one.
Are you arguing for prevenient grace? I am not, I do not believe that God starts loving an individual at "some point," but rather that he has always loved everyone.
So are you saying that someone getting shot, or a bomb killing children, or a man committing suicide are all God's will? And wouldn't this necessarily take away all free will of our own, rendering life meaningless?
Again, this does not fit the description of the loving, just God who treats everyone equally.
I disagree. Our nature must change in order for us to resist sin, but not to seek and follow God:
Galatians 2:20:"I have been crucified with Christ. It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me. And the life I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me."In your view, his nature must have inherently been different in order for him to accept Jesus, but this shows that it changed after.
How does God hating sin create his will for some people to come to him and others not to?
Where is your proof that some people are not able to obey this command? Second, can you explain more about what you mean by the last sentence in this quote.
So how does it make sense for God to stop some people from doing the things that please him and then to get mad at those people when they do what he made them to do, which is to not please him (in your view). The answer is that it doesn't make sense.
God has shown that he doesn't need word-by-mouth to communicate the gospel."For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities – his eternal power and divine nature – have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse" (Romans 1:20)Why would he have us waste our time with those that have no chance of going to heaven if the people he has irresistibly drawn to him will come by one way or another?
This is you reading into the scripture. The lack of predestination here shows that it is not valid.
Could you explain what you mean?
Any method that involves irresistibly drawing us toward the faith is controlling our free will. It is called "free" will because it is ours, and therefore our choice. If we are irresistibly drawn, that means it was God's choice, not our own.
As I described, God wants everyone to come to him, so why then would he stop some from making the choice to come to him? Yes, all are sinners and unbelievers, which is why they must choose to come to him so he may make us new and whole.
yes and yes! but it wouldn't render life meaningless. Its not his prescribed will but it is decreed otherwise it wouldn't happen. What needs to be weighed in this observation is the fact we have satan also trying to destroy us, He cannot do anything God doesn't allow him however.
He does treat everyone equally, but he has foreordained us all to a unique destiny. Ezekiel 18 explains the just and fairness of God (not considering predestination as they didn't know of it at that time) God is no respecter of persons acts 10:34-43. However, what we need to consider before accusing God of not loving is the idea of the sin he holds us back from and his expressed nature in prescribed will. 1 John 4:8
Galatians is showing a change in nature "I am crucified with christ. it is no long I who live" This is showing a death of sin nature, which is necessary to understand in the requirements of repentance. Romans 6:1-11 talks more about this. colossians 2:6-15. and in my arguement i said "it is necessary for the elect to have a similar nature to God in order to obey and seek him"
I was stressing his nature creates the will, not the hatred of sin. All are children of wrath however until they repent and come to the obedience of christ.
2 corinthians 4:4 romans 8:7 in my question i was challenging the assertion of free will and if God said or revealed at anytime that mankind would NOT suffer or die? according to his decreed will.
He never stopped them, he simply never gave them that will to such a degree that they would do it, but they hardened their hearts when challenged with it like pharaoh hardened his heart when commanded by moses to let God's people Go.
as to why God gets mad at them, isaiah 10 is a good example! God had the assyrians to attack israel then God punished them for their heart and thoughts because of it.
I agree, God never needed to do anything, but he chooses to do this so that those who didn't see his power might still have a chance to hear and believe. Again, sinners are blinded by the devil (who God uses) so that they can't see it. Again, because we don't know who the elect are, but if we are to be like God, we must seek after them like he does. His prescribed will shows his lovingkindness and love even toward sinners.
Ephesians 1:4-5 shows evidence of predestination, however it doesn't give specific example of it like verses 7-13 do. Im not saying its invalid im saying it doesn't give clear examples here like it does later on.
The original greek shows no word that could interpret to be "Become" as the website you show translated it.
Exactly, we are born by God's choice, Paul puts it very well here. Acts 17:28. We cannot do anything without God. There is no evidence of free will in the decreed sense
No one willingly chooses to come to God. psalms 53:1-5 and paul stresses it again in romans 3:9-20 to explain the grace of God drawls us to him.
Why wouldn't life become meaningless? Our meaning is derived out of the purpose we gain from our actions, so if we are just puppets then that means life is an illusion.
If God treats all equally, then he gives everyone the opportunity to become a Christian. However, in the Calvinist view, this is not true. That is a direct contradiction. God not being a respecter of persons simply means that he doesn't look at your outside, he looks at your heart and your true beliefs. Also, how does God hold us back from sin?
I was saying that the change occurred after he believed. In the Calvinistic view, there must have been some change beforehand that allowed him to become a Christian in the first place.
What distinguishes the so-called elect from the non-elect? Why do they deserve to go to hell because of the way they were created?
No, however, God said he is working for our good. How is wanting someone to get brutally murdered working for that person's good? Or getting maimed in an earthquake or a tornado? Or burned in a natural fire?
If they cannot make the decision at all, that means he did stop them. Even if he let them do "the rest of the work for him" by continuing the denial process, that is still stopping them because he took away the will to do it to such a degree that they couldn't stop themselves from not doing it.
That's not true. God didn't punish them because of their hearts during it, he punished them because the Assyrian king took credit for the victory instead of giving it to the Lord. So my question remains, why does God get mad at these people for doing something he made them do?Isaiah 10:12, 13, 15: "...I will punish the fruit of the stout heart of the king of Assyria, and the glory of his high looks. For he saith, By the strength of my hand I have done it, and by my wisdom;...Shall the axe boast itself against him that heweth therewith? or shall the saw magnify itself against him that shaketh it? as if the rod should shake itself against them that lift it up, or as if the staff should lift up itself, as if it were no wood."
Why does someone need to hear the word if they can't accept it?
it says "us." Where is your evidence that "us" excludes everyone else? Why wouldn't Paul simply be discussing God's omniscience and how he knew that that group of people would become Christians?
The scripture says that God chose those people "in love." He chose them because he loves them. As has been demonstrated multiple times in scripture, God loves everyone; it is simply his nature to do so. Therefore, if he chooses for salvation whom he loves, and he loves everyone, then he must logically therefore choose everyone. Anything else is contradictory.
The word "become" is in your view of the scripture as well as mine. I don't see how this changes anything.
Yes, we are born of God, but he gives us the free will to operate. That is our choice. Just because he gives us the platform to make our choice (our very lives, the Earth, the Bible, etc.) doesn't mean that he forces our choice.
Yes, the grace of God does draw us to him. However, it does not force us to choose him. There is a stark difference between the two. Seeking God does not equate to choosing God.
The meaning of life is to serve God and in serving God we experience the Joys and pleasures of God, or, the temporary pleasures and deceitfulness of Sin, According to whom God has chosen for which.
I am not arguing calvinism, only predestination. Idk what calvinist views are. According to the word of God he does give people the opportunity to know him, However they will not know him because they have no will or desire from God to choose God. God being a respecter of persons means he doesn't respect any one person. God weighing the spirits is him looking at your heart and beliefs. How? Simple, he makes sure that such desire doesn't enter us. He is responsible for the will, or, the spirit that is in man.
God moved him to belief as he fore ordained that he would. Paul's testimony is that the Lord changed him on the road of Damascus when he was surrounded by light and Jesus spoke to him. It wasn't something he put in himself.
Why don't the elect go to hell? They were born in sin right? so they deserve the same punishment. The answer is God having mercy on whom he will and hardening whom he will in Romans 9.
The fact the person lived and breathed at all is a blessing. We don't deserve life. it might be the person murdered could have been a murderer himself, I don't know why God does things specifically, but the bible says that He has a purpose in Isaiah 41:21-23.
I thinks its awfully great and Kind of God to establish a purpose for everything he does instead of just doing it because it pleases him. For christians we have this promise "All things work together for the good for them who are the called according to his purpose" Romans 8:28
Never doing something is not the same as stopping yourself from doing it, even simple logic teaches us that. We don't have the will to serve God, psalms 53. Our inherent will is to do EVIL. We are SINNERS. i hope i'm getting this across to ya.
I just said that God punished them because of their heart, The bible says the thoughts proceed from the heart. matthew 15:18-9 Mark 7:21.
As to why God Got mad at them? They didn't reflect his nature because he didn't allow his nature to be revealed that they might humble themselves.
Assyrians: “We got the victory by ourselves!”
God: Now I will destroy them for doing the thing that I just made them do.
How is that a loving God?
I just told you, didn't you read? Some will accept it, others will not.
Just like you aren't accepting the word of God regarding predestination, you just refuse to see it.
You have to go to the greek to see it, but just from context and the fact that paul is writing to a CHURCH, that he is talking to christ believers. Read from verse 1 to verse 5. Infact, the whole chapter of ephesians 1 is talking to saints at ephesus and in the broadest context refers to other saints. Because verse 5 use active verb in reference to predestine. I advise looking at the Greek.
Leader: We are strong, and we are brave. Let’s take the victory.
Follwors: Yeah, let’s do it!
Does the “we” here mean that ONLY these people are strong and brave? Obviously not.
Thats a misreading of verse 4, its like you just skipped the choosing part of the verse, KJV According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love: NASB Just as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we would be holy and blameless before Him. In love. ESV even as he chose us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and blameless before him. In love
Again you are advocating open theism of the scriptures which says that God has to save everyone,
That limits the mercy of God to justice, Justice however demands that every sin be thrown in the lake of fire. Mercy is not Justice. God indeed loves every person, but he doesn't choose who will be saved by love, but by grace. Mercy is free to chose what he wishes to express it on and is a higher law than justice.
Not to mention you would completely misunderstand the context of verse 5 which says "To the Good will and pleasure of him" Not Through love
it is not. To become would mean that God made us divine sons, not that we were predestined to become divine sons. Seriously you need to read these links i post and the scriptures.https://biblehub.com/text/ephesians/1-5.htm
My view: God allows anyone who chooses to become a Christian.
Both have the word “become.”
There is no scripture or recognition of God concerning free will, in fact i gave verses earlier that dismissed the concept of free will. and don't think to use the "Free will offering" mentioned in the old testament, that has reference to a person moved by God to offer. Such as we are moved by God to have mercy on those we meet that are not doing well.
Joshua 24:15
Romans 10:9-10
Mark 8:34
That’s only a few.
Actually it does, The bible those that seek shall find. So to those who do seek God, they will find God. It does force us to him, otherwise we wouldn't chose him, The scriptures are plain when it says "there is none that choose God" how do you think we end up choosing him if we don't choose him? Something made us choose him.
So it’s saying that before the law, no one can choose God, but after and apart from it, righteousness is for everyone who believes, and that there is NO DIFFERENCE between anyone.
Alrighty! i've gone over all your statements. I will leave Round 5 blank unless you have questions you really want me to answer.
I would appreciate it if you could respond.
Alrighty! i've gone over all your statements. I will leave Round 5 blank unless you have questions you really want me to answer.
Then replace "Calvinistic views" with "predestination views." Exactly, God doesn't respect any ONE person. He respects everyone EQUALLY. So how is stopping some people from believing and allowing others to believe respecting everyone equally?
I agree! So what’s God’s purpose for choosing some people and not others?
You originally offered this as an example of God getting mad at people who did what he told them to do. The showed that that was not true. So again, why does God get mad at sinners for doing the only thing that they CAN do?
God: “I’m gonna make it so these people can’t be humble”Assyrians: “We got the victory by ourselves!”God: Now I will destroy them for doing the thing that I just made them do.How is that a loving God?
How is that a misreading? It literally says “in love.”
Why does neither side define Calvinism? Ugh! So my understanding after googling it, is that the events of the world are predestined - and those who are saved do not get to chose, its down to Gods implicit choice.
Con starts out by pointing out the major theological issues with Calvinism: specifically he points out that scriptures make repeated reference to everyone being redeemable.
Pros opening round primarily just explains what Calvinism is. It does not appear to lay out a specific justification for why this is the correct interpretation of the bible.
Cons rebuttal of the premise continues - pointing out it means that God would be directly involves in the creation of sin, and points out some additional scriptural quotes where the idea of free choice appears to refute the concept of predestination. Con drops a very intuitive example of children in a test that clearly explains why this logic is incorrect.
Reading through pros entire round 2, this appears to be, primarily an attempt to explain how a Calvinistic interpretation could be correct despite appearing to have a number of flaws. There are a lot of points to individually list here - but reading this round twice, there is no justification: any argument to explain why Pros position is correct, it appears mostly an assertion that he is correct, then using examples to explain contradictions.
This pattern is repeated into round 3, where the most relevant portions involve con pointing out the scriptural weakness of pros position, and why it seems to not make sense in terms of generalized understanding of the bible and what God wants for everyone.
Pros round 3 again, constitutes more of an attempt to explain how he can reconcile Calvinism with the Bible - but does not justify the claim itself.
This really continues as the pattern between round 4 and finally 5. There is a lot of back and forth on whether a Calvinistic explanation is contradicted by the bible, but still there doesn’t appear much in the way of outright justification from pro.
If the resolution was Calvinism is compatible with the Bible, I may have had a different vote - but as it is whether Calvinism is True - and pro did not provide a justification to this effect - arguments must be awarded to con.
All other points tied.
This voter is bewildered by the popularity of debating questions of faith in any forum of reason. Faith is defined by the absence of reason: if one could prove it logically it would not be faith. Logic is defined by the absence of faith, if it can't be proved it is not true.
Here, we are so far from reasoned discourse that neither participant bothers to state thesis or definition, precept or assumption. Neither side, for example, bothers to identify the Bible as their exclusive source, neither bothers to define Calvinism for readers. By R3, both sides essentially admit that they aren't interested in debating Calvinism but rather the notion of predestination as evidenced by the Bible.
Con's arguments are
Calvinism states that a pre-selected few achieve salvation
The Bible states that all men can be saved
Calvinism contradicts the Bible
Preselection refutes the value of conversion.
The Bible endorses evangelism.
Calvinism contradicts the Bible.
Predestination implies the incorruptibility of salvation.
The Bible says salvation can be forsaken
Calvinism contradicts the Bible.
Pro's R1 asserts that predestination is manifestly true.
"The scriptures show heavy evidence of God who predetermines...'
To accept predestination gives glory to God and makes humans afraid of their own humanity.
One can tell the people who are predestined to be saved by their claims of salvation, everyone else is unpredestined & therefore unsaved.
In R2, Con continues to support "all men can be saved" with biblical passages. Pro refutes by saying "some men can't be saved but its all up to God and essentially unknowable, even to the saved." Pro end R2 by stating that Pro is not a defender of Calvinism only predestination.
R3-R5 continues in much the same way.
Con has faith that a loving God includes any who choose him as the path to salvation. Pro has faith that God determines how men choose salvation and worship and deprives some of salvation for doing as forced. Pro denies any injustice to this: In the puppet box, we are all puppets alike, it's just that Geppetto has foreordained the fire for some puppets.
Both sides toss in many citations. The Bible both states and contradicts that all men can be saved. The Bible endorses and contradicts evangelism. The Bible both implies and contradicts the incorruptibility of salvation.
The problem with this increases as rounds progress: it is clear that this work's strange discontinuities, anachronistic morals and ambiguous language make the Bible pretty weak as a rational source of evidence. That this single source is continually shown to offer contradictory evidence regarding predestination gradually increases the proof that this source is at least sometimes, perhaps oftentimes, unreliable, certainly never published with the intention of representing a single point of view. So neither side is awarded sources because both sides relied exclusively on the same single and unreliable source. Likewise, because both sides' arguments relied exclusively on the same single and unreliable source I don't think it can be fairly said one side achieved any persuasive advantage over the other. If asked which cosmology sounds more appealing, this voter would fall into Con's camp. But my job is to assess who made a more convincing case regarding Calvinism, or really predestination as it turns out, and neither side achieved any warranted claim.
Tied all around.
The basis is calvinism true was an incorrect title for the debate. we actually tried to change it. Basically we tried to argue if predestination is supported by scripture or not.
*cry*
Some of those questions you asked me did put me through the ringer, There is a lot i don't know about God or how he does things. But i do know that sometimes God would speak to those who believe in him (elect/fore ordained) and tell them to do something and they would either do it or not do it, regardless of the will. I don't have an answer for that, other than the will is more subtle in some cases than in others.
"You’re referring to Romans 3:11. The same chapter in verses 21-24 says “But now apart from the law the righteousness of God has been made known, to which the Law and the Prophets testify. This righteousness is given through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe. There is no difference between Jew and Gentile,for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and all are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus.
So it’s saying that before the law, no one can choose God, but after and apart from it, righteousness is for everyone who believes, and that there is NO DIFFERENCE between any."
you are misunderstanding the context of the verses. God is saying that righteousness is revealed in them that believe and that through belief all of them are justified freely by his grace through redemption that came by Christ Jesus. The difference that is significant here is hebrew and greek. Paul is emphasing that all have sinned and none have sought him through their own will, but those who were called and ordained, they have faith in Jesus christ regardless of nationality or sin. The law will no longer condemn those who didn't seek God as they find redemption through Jesus christ, because No one could follow the law in all points and be sinless. Therefore he took our sin and became sin for us that through him we have redemption.
"Your view: God predestined a select group of people to become Christians.
My view: God allows anyone who chooses to become a Christian.
Both have the word “become.” Where i put the become is the issue. Do we become sons before or after we are born? We are predestined to son ship.
John 7:17
Joshua 24:15
Romans 10:9-10
Mark 8:34
Joshua 24:15 makes no seperation of God's will imputed in the choices, therefore they were already predetermined. and again, they had no knowledge of predestination at that time.
Mark 8:34 "Whosoever will come after me," jesus is addressing those who have the will to take up the cross, this crucial to understanding that God imputes the will. Jesus is recognizing those who would come after him and he instructs them to deny himself, take up their cross and follow him, which they will do as they the will.
John 7:17 falls in same category, "If any man will do his will, He SHALL know of the doctrine," Recognition of the will of God on those he is speaking to and again informing them as they will do it.
romans 10:9-10 This is demonstrating how the will works, not showing choice of man. and again shows instruction. "For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness:" thats where the will is imputed in man The bible says "Blessed is the man whom the lord imputes no sin" Or, has no will to sin.
I have missed one of your questions. "You’ve said that believers will go to God irresistibly, regardless of if they hear the Word or not. So again, why are we told to preach to people who will go to God regardless and to people who CAN’T go to God?"
I invite voters to withdraw a point for conduct because i missed this one.
I never said believers will go to God irresistibly, I said Gods grace is irresistible in that it draws them, preaching is one of the ways grace drawls people. We are told to preach that they might hear, even though they may have already denied creation's proof of God. Just because people may not come to God through recognition of creation, they may come to God through the revealing of his word.
"I’m aware that he was speaking to believers. You haven’t explained why the “us” excludes everyone else.
Leader: We are strong, and we are brave. Let’s take the victory.
Follwors: Yeah, let’s do it!
Does the “we” here mean that ONLY these people are strong and brave? Obviously not."
You provided an example that doesn't specify the context of what Us is. where as ephesians does.
"I’m not saying that, I’m saying that God offers salvation to everyone and he saves those who accept it."
And who can accept it unless God drawls them?
"You just said that God has a purpose for everything and he doesn’t do stuff just for his pleasure."
isaiah 41:21-23. The purpose and pleasure are together, God does nothing without a purpose or his pleasure. therefore i didn't see fit to emphasis the need for purpose as i established that God does everything with a purpose. Thats like saying i offered you a suit but i didn't talk about the tie, the tie is included in the suit.
"If God is controlling us and everything we do, that's not serving."
Sure it is, God accomplishes what he wants through us. Again, he isn't controlling us, he is inserting and refraining will through the spirit.
"In the predestination view, the "elect" have had some spiritual difference in them since the beginning of time. However, here it says that the change occurred on the road."
No, the predestination view never establishes a difference in any person, only the fore ordaining of God before they were born. A person who is fore ordained is no better and has no more advantages than a person who is not. God revealed himself to Paul on the road and there was a recognition from him that he is Lord, the one he persecuted even against his own pricks of the conscience. Which God does to everyone, he reveals or manifests or sends a will that people will consider and obey and follow him.
"There is no "elect"."
1 peter 1:1-2 matthew 24:22-24
"I never said that we deserve life. God says he works for our good, which goes beyond just giving us life. And lots of people who aren’t murderers and are innocent are killed everyday."
he does work for our Good, he keeps us from many things including sin. Im saying we never deserve life and im justified in saying that because of scripture. As to why some die and some don't God has a purpose through it and for it.
"I’m aware of our nature. However, that doesn’t mean that we can ONLY do evil. Non-believers do good all the time. This is why Jesus died to give us grace, so that we can CHOOSE salvation."
"There is none that do Good." We can only do evil unless God changes and introduces us to his nature and his goodness. Grace is to help us become more like him as we live our life and it keeps us from sin. Grace is unmerited favor, God has unmerited favor on everyone.
I'm unable to do that
Is it possible to change the title to better suit the context of this debate?
If you are able, would you change the title to something like "Is predestination false?" that way your position as instigator and my postition as contender makes more sense in the debate.
Ohhh ok, thank you so much
When you " " hit the quote button of the selected sentence. I copy and paste the sentence then hit quotes button.
How do you do that grey background thing?
Ill leave round 5 blank on my side, unless there are questions you want me to address.
a very good scripture is isaiah 41:21-23 God challenges Gods to consider the former things and declare their outcome.
genesis 50:18-20 i forgot the 50 on that one. - spelling grammar point.
Oh you meant three separate beings, yeah I don't support that either.
Really? I do support the Holy Trinity, just not predestination.
Ill go ahead and say i do not support a trinitarian view, as far as i know, the concept of predestination is what i agree with regarding calvinism. If we are going to debate their doctrines, then i will concede, i follow the bible specifically.