Instigator / Pro
14
1266
rating
119
debates
15.97%
won
Topic
#699

"benevolent oligarchy" is oxymoronic

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
6
3
Better sources
4
4
Better legibility
2
2
Better conduct
2
2

After 2 votes and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...

Type1
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
Three days
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
11
1495
rating
47
debates
48.94%
won
Description

No information

Round 1
Pro
#1
Oligarchy cannot be benevolent, because the more authority there is the more class there is, and the more class there is the more the interests of the people at large and the people in power are divided. 
Con
#2
Oxymoron: A rhetorical figure in which incongruous or contradictory terms are combined, as in a deafening silence and a mournful optimist.

Benevolent definition, characterized by or expressing goodwill or kindly feelings

Oligarchy is a form of power structure in which power rests with a small number of people.

There is nothing inherently oxymoronic about these terms. Your hypothesis that the more authority there is the more "class" there is is as of yet unsupported. Even if what you say is true, why can one class not be benevolent towards the other?
Round 2
Pro
#3
Forfeited
Con
#4
Forfeited
Round 3
Pro
#5
Forfeited
Con
#6
Forfeited