BestKorea should not be banned from this site
The participant that receives the most points from the voters is declared a winner.
Voting will end in:
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Rated
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
- Minimal rating
- 1,200
" The strength of men's spirit then be measured by how much "truth " he can tolerate " by Fredrick Nietzsche
if u get what he say then u r more legitimate to handle the case and the second thing is to understand BestKorea (the graceful debater i know u know her very well )
Pro belief : BestKorea should not be banned and she have right/responsible for everything , for every thought or belief she represent and she have right to debate as debater
( no matter what , she have right to defend her , so other can listen and learnt )
He has a new account called the sun God. He just asked the mods to close that account for him
but well i still don't get why best korea is banned rn? i mean can any1 throw light on that? evry1 here is saying stuff as they please, so but yeah since idk then i'd like to know/meow
You are welcome to reread your arguments and see for yourself
"Why not make actual arguments instead of random bare assertions with zero support? you chose to make bad arguments instead. You need to believe in your arguments for it to work."
More unproved opinions from you.
Why not make actual arguments instead of random bare assertions with zero support?
You could literally repurpose ADOL's arguments for this but you chose to make bad arguments instead. You need to believe in your arguments for it to work.
" You aren't debating it though which is the issue"
That is your unproved opinion, I guess.
I have debates similar topics just fine. You aren't debating it though which is the issue. I argued that child porn should be legal and I never even got a warning about it or a mod make a comment
You guys made it clear that such topic is a no no. So since its a no no, I am not going to debate it anymore. But to pretend they were winning something there before it got closed is very funny.
You object to my way of debating, no?
Reading the thread for the first time. Here is your first argument
"
Why would anyone think that children cant consent?
Common, fight me on this."
Are you talking about a thread I was not in at all? I am the biggest defender of free speech here.
"It's not hard to defeat that sort of thing especially when your previous arguments make that logic null and void when no rebuttal is offered"
Sounds like you make some strange assumption that you guys were winning there and that you could beat it easily, but lets face it, if you guys were winning anything there, you wouldnt beg mods to lock my thread. I used less than 1% of my arguments there, yet you guys couldnt handle it. What you are saying is not true. The truth is, you guys saw that there was no way for you to win anything there, so went begging for it to stop. As if someone forces you to be in my thread lol
"So you get defeated by copy paste? Sure, I have 3000 arguments and 600.000 characters written on the topic. Yeah, I am invincible, I get it. There is no way for other people to get the last word when I have so many words ☹ 🥺😭"
It's not about that. It's not hard to defeat that sort of thing especially when your previous arguments make that logic null and void when no rebuttal is offered.
I want to learn about the strength of my own arguments or their flaws and it's not possible when your opponent is just copying and pasting stuff that your arguments already defeat. It's better to engage with your opponents arguments instead of spamming arguments that acceptance of a few of their premises already disprove.
Yes it's easy to beat a retard at a debate. It's also not fun and it often takes more effort than beating good or bad arguments. There is 4 debate types . I imagine a box
-----------------------------
Effort and winning are the combinations
1. Easy to win high effort
2. Easy to win low effort
3. Hard to win low effort
4. Hard to win high effort
Easy to win hard effort is the most retarded type of opponent to be. That means you assentially like mall . Nobody enjoys engaging with you and it's essentially like interacting with a literal retards or child.
The other 3 debate types are fine. Debater 2 is for farming, debater 1 is for wasting your time and the other 2 is to challenge yourself and have something to learn from.
"The problem is that he's not really defending these positions but more like trolling people by pretending he has them."
Not sure if I am pretending, but its not really my fault that people are so afraid of debate. Like, there were 10 people debating against me in the forum and they were all losing lol
"usually even in his rebuttals he's just copying and pasting like a set of arguments that he's already written down so he doesn't really respond to arguments as much as he just gish gallops them."
So you get defeated by copy paste? Sure, I have 3000 arguments and 600.000 characters written on the topic. Yeah, I am invincible, I get it. There is no way for other people to get the last word when I have so many words ☹ 🥺😭
First of all. Never set max characters that high. 2nd of all I am not even sure what that says and interpreting it will be tough