Instigator / Pro
32
1577
rating
97
debates
59.28%
won
Topic
#6037

Protestantism is more correct than catholic/orthodox

Status
Voting

The participant that receives the most points from the voters is declared a winner.

Voting will end in:

00
DD
:
00
HH
:
00
MM
:
00
SS
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Rated
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
Three days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Minimal rating
None
Contender / Con
16
1511
rating
6
debates
25.0%
won
Description

No information

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Having fully forfeited 2 rounds, Con loses by forfeiture. Also, Con did not take the obvious, and necessary opposing argument that would have argued for Catholicism being the "more correct," but instead, devalued Christianityt altogether.

Con actually had more cited sources.

Both participants had good legibility.

Although forfeiting would normally argue for losing the conduct point, Pro's attitude toward Con was unacceptable harassment in two rounds. Point goes to Con.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Full forfeiture

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

I disagree, but forfeiture.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Full forfeiture

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

(I disagree with the resolution and love this subject, so I would be interested in debating FishChaser on this one.)

Essentially, Pro is arguing that the basic foundation of Christianity is based on scripture. Therefore, whichever side adheres to scripture is the closest to theological truth.
Protestantism is therefore more accurate than Catholicism and Orthodox.
Con makes no attempt to contest the resolution or argue the side she is required to argue. Instead Con tries, very unsuccessfully, to kritik the resolution by raising doubts for the existence of god. Since this is not a discussion about atheism vs christianity, I am rejecting this kritik.

Pro correctly points out that whether god exists/doesn't exist is irrelevant, as he is only referring to scriptural accuracy alone. Pro automatically wins this for arguments, and Con forfeits. Twice.
Which means the conduct point also goes to Pro.