Instigator / Con
15
1525
rating
24
debates
58.33%
won
Topic
#6034

There is evidence supporting the existence of a god

Status
Voting

The participant that receives the most points from the voters is declared a winner.

Voting will end in:

00
DD
:
00
HH
:
00
MM
:
00
SS
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
One week
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Pro
28
1500
rating
0
debates
0.0%
won
Description

To start I should define the most important terms in this debate;
God - supernatural being above logic
Above (atleast as used above) - being independent of and not limited by
Evidence - an available body of facts to support a view
**if you don’t like this definition feel free to say so in the comments and we can change it for the debate**
Pro: there is evidence for the existence of god
Con: there has been no evidence for the existence of god presented yet
Burden of proof will lie with pro due to them claiming there is evidence for the existence of god

Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Forfeiture.

Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Full forfeiture

Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Forfeiture.

Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Second half of the debate is forfeiture vs AI. However, in the first round, Pro makes a case that Con doesn't respond to. Con makes no case of his own.