Noah's flood was local rather than global

The Bible said that water covered the whole land and "all of the earth"

But there are other instances where the Bible uses the same phrasing, but it doesn't actually mean the entire planet.

Geological evidence doesn't support a global flood, however it does very strongly support the probability that all of mesopotamia was once submerged roughly 5000-7000 years ago.

A bird brings Noah an olive branch as a sign that the flood is about to subside, an olive branch wouldn't have been able to grow directly after the entire earth was submerged. It must have been from a non-submerged area.

After the water subsides Noah and his family search for survivors, why would there be survivors other than themselves if the literal entire planet was murdered?

How would Noah's family reproduce if they were the only humans? With each other?

The less you know, the better.

Anyway, Noah's flood talks of Bible's version of flood and God did say he killed everyone on Earth except Noah and his family.

The bible meant everyone in the place where the flood actually happened.

Noah's flood was local rather than global as evidenced by the fact that my opponent got banned. to suggest that it was global in light of the fact that he was banned would be logically absurd.