You pick the topic.
The participant that receives the most points from the voters is declared a winner.
Voting will end in:
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- Six months
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.
Send a message for questions on the topic.
Please do not accept if you foresee yourself not having time to participate.
I extend an invitation to the apparent opposing side to watch or listen to the video(s) on transgenderism at the YouTube channel address:
For instance, the prostate. The "squirting" or fluid that is released during sexual activity is actually the prostate fluid. The cis male is indeed experiencing same sex physiological functioning during sexual activity.
You can say , looking at it that way, it's homosexuality. But you'll have others, perhaps the opposing side , that will define sexuality based on just identity alone as opposed to physical make-up.
But you're either heterosexual or homosexual.
Now gay people or homosexual folks themselves. I've heard of people that were once homosexual but rescind. Does this prove that homosexuality once and for all is not natural?
The diagnosis of it being a disorder decades back was not an error. But it has been modified to the state of being a condition no longer necessary or looked at by science and medicine to treat or deemed impossible to revert.
Should the U.S. president push policies for transgender rights?
Why isn't homosexuality and the lifestyle pushed and showcase particularly in advertisements in this day and time?
Could it be that it is a deep rooted position that this can't be pushed as it truly is not a foundation of society for thriving the family unit?
We understand or can understand that folks have rights, right to marry, right to vote, right to evaluate their qualifications to adopt children, then assume legal guardianship/custody, right to equal opportunity and patronage.
The government grants all that. These people are just not quite the pillars of society and with that, it leaves the space always there to isolate a niche or group having them to stand out still as estranged from typical sexual relationships, man and woman at least.
So why prevent certain things? You prevent what's not in order because you don't do everything any which a way.
It's really inconclusive until a greater context is made. Is it monkey see, monkey do? How long is the kissing?Is it manipulative or by force from a greater power?I don't particularly hold immature children as exactly knowing better than what they're taught, exposed to or groomed into being which begs the question of homosexuality being programmed actually.
I agree people have the right meaning legal allowance . So by that , people do whatever they want.
The difference is they would drop significantly.
It just like how I said it. I support and encourage it.
Heterosexual doesn't mean attracted to every but only an opposite sex individual.
The question still remains of individuals that no longer participate in homosexual activities, does this give grounds to homosexuality not being an innate orientation?
There is no "perfect age". Abortion occurs many times behind immaturity so that has to be incorporated concerning child births.
When you say "reproducing with women", how can you be homosexual which means only being sexually active with the same sex, why would you be reproducing with the opposite sex?
So homosexuality is programmed and not natural. Is that correct?
Are you saying homosexual men engage in reproductive sex with women?
Looks like there is nothing here yet
I am introducing a new type of debate on this site. I have sent you a message, in case you missed it. The topic will simply be trans and gays. Just raise some different points related to gays and trans, and we will see where we agree and where we disagree.
i would hv accepted but well, 5 rounds are too much