Instigator / Pro
Jesusistheway's avatar
Jesusistheway
1500
rating
0
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#5866

Christianity is more reasonable to believe in than Atheism is

Status
Debating

Waiting for the next argument from the contender.

Round will be automatically forfeited in:

00
DD
:
00
HH
:
00
MM
:
00
SS
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
One week
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
Skipper_Sr's avatar
Skipper_Sr
1500
rating
10
debates
35.0%
won
Description

The debate will go off of the resolved," Christianity is more reasonable to believe in than Atheism is "
PRO holds the BOP to show Christianity is more reasonable to believe in (than it is to believe in atheism).
CON holds the BOP to show Atheism is more reasonable to believe in (than it is to believe in Christianity).

Round 1
Jesusistheway's avatar
Jesusistheway
Pro
#1
Thank you to my opponent for accepting this debate. 

I affirm the resolution "Christianity is More Reasonable to Believe in than Atheism is"

Here are the definitions I thought best fit this case:
Christianity: "the religion based on the person and teachings of Jesus of Nazareth, or its beliefs and practices"
Reasonable: "(of a person) having sound judgment; fair and sensible:"
Believe: "accept (something) as true; feel sure of the truth of:"
Atheism: "disbelief in the existence of God or gods:"

My value for this case will be:
Rationality, which refers to the quality of being based on or in accordance with reason or logic. In this case, rationality will be the foundation for why one Christianity offers more reasonable grounds to believe in it than Atheism.

My value criterion is: 
Explanatory Power, which refers to a worldview’s ability to provide comprehensive, coherent, and satisfying explanations for various things, such as the origin of the universe, the nature of morality, the existence of human consciousness, and the purpose of life.

PRO holds the BOP to show Christianity is more reasonable to believe in (than it is to believe in atheism).
CON holds the BOP to show Atheism is more reasonable to believe in (than it is to believe in Christianity).


1st CONTENTION:
The Big Bang Theory ultimately favors Christianity rather than Atheism

According to Center for Astrophysics (Harvard & Smithsonian):
"About 13.8 billion years ago, the Big Bang gave rise to everything, everywhere, and everywhen—the entire known Universe."

Clarification:
Now it would be improper for me to state that this source says the Big Bang is the origin of the Universe. It only claims that it is the leading theory. 

According to Nasa.gov:
"The Big Bang: It is the idea that the universe began as just a single point, then expanded and stretched to grow as large as it is right now—and it is still stretching!"

The Big Bang, other theories, and atheism, have to concede to the fact that our universe is now something and had to of come from something. The Law of Causality tells us that every material effect must have a simultaneous cause. 
Atheism doesn't have an answer for what the cause of the Big Bang was. However, Christianity provides a more Reasonable explanation that doesn't contradict the laws of science as we know it. Christianity also provides a better explanation for why the Big Bang occurred, how it occurred and what caused it.

If we look to the first book of the Bible, Genisis, it says:
"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.
3 And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light."
Genisis 1:1-3

Therefore, it is more rational to assume that the Big Bang Theory favors Christianity rather than Atheism. 


2 CONTENTION:
The Nature of Morality ultimately favors Christianity rather than Atheism. 

Morality "as defined by Brittanica" is "morality, the moral beliefs and practices of a culture, community, or religion or a code or system of moral rules, principles, or values."

I appeal to OBJECTIVE MORALITY for my case. If CON wishes to contend it, I will rebuttal. 

If morality is to be Objective to everyone and not subjective to each person, then morality is a force that transcends humanity as a whole. Objective morality requires a moral law. 
Morality also requires a mind. Morality cannot be comprehended by a rock, or the dirt, or the wind. Morality requires some sort of conciseness'. 

Therefore, Objective Morality requires:
A transcendent lawgiving mind. 

Christianity more reasonably explains this transcendent lawgiving mind rather than Atheism. This is shown in the Bibles affirmation of a God. 

Therefore, it is more reasonable to assume that the Nature of Morality favors Christianity rather than Atheism. 

And with that I will hand it off to my opponent. 









Not published yet
Round 2
Not published yet
Not published yet
Round 3
Not published yet
Not published yet
Round 4
Not published yet
Not published yet
Round 5
Not published yet
Not published yet