Instigator / Pro
1
1233
rating
403
debates
39.45%
won
Topic
#5811

My prayers vs your prayers. (You can use AI to write prayers)

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Winner
1
1

After 1 vote and with the same amount of points on both sides...

It's a tie!
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
Two weeks
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
1
1500
rating
3
debates
66.67%
won
Description

No information

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:

Note that I am not given the full array of voting parameters [arguments, sourcing, legibility, conduct] - a system glitch. But, given the following:

PRO: "My prayers vs your prayers. (You can use AI to write prayers)" is the given Resolution, which begs the following concern: The latter allowance is to what end? This debate becomes a matter of; "My AI is better than your AI" So what? All of AI is artificial, hence, the name. If even prayer can be rendered so impersonal [AI is also that, because it is a matter of circuits that have no true feeling, no sense of spirituality [isn't that prayer, at its core?], and, therefore, a sham.
In addition, Pro forfeited 2 of 5 rounds [I do not consider an emoji to be either an argument or a positive indicator of a wived round. - I want to see the words, because that emoji [a smiley face] does not signifying a waive - I might have construed a hand emoji to signify a waive, but, just like words, emojis cannot say whatever we want them to say.], which therefore meets the 40% rule of my acknowledging sufficient argument rounds.

CON: forfeited 3 of 5 rounds. sufficient to declare the debate as forfeited by Con, even though completing two argument rounds.

Vote: Tie