My prayers vs your prayers. (You can use AI to write prayers)
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 1 vote and with the same amount of points on both sides...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- Two weeks
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
No information
Note that I am not given the full array of voting parameters [arguments, sourcing, legibility, conduct] - a system glitch. But, given the following:
PRO: "My prayers vs your prayers. (You can use AI to write prayers)" is the given Resolution, which begs the following concern: The latter allowance is to what end? This debate becomes a matter of; "My AI is better than your AI" So what? All of AI is artificial, hence, the name. If even prayer can be rendered so impersonal [AI is also that, because it is a matter of circuits that have no true feeling, no sense of spirituality [isn't that prayer, at its core?], and, therefore, a sham.
In addition, Pro forfeited 2 of 5 rounds [I do not consider an emoji to be either an argument or a positive indicator of a wived round. - I want to see the words, because that emoji [a smiley face] does not signifying a waive - I might have construed a hand emoji to signify a waive, but, just like words, emojis cannot say whatever we want them to say.], which therefore meets the 40% rule of my acknowledging sufficient argument rounds.
CON: forfeited 3 of 5 rounds. sufficient to declare the debate as forfeited by Con, even though completing two argument rounds.
Vote: Tie