Instigator / Con
0
1420
rating
398
debates
44.1%
won
Topic
#5776
Is the human population a problem for humanity?
Status
Voting
The participant that receives the most points from the voters is declared a winner.
Voting will end in:
00
DD
:
00
HH
:
00
MM
:
00
SS
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- Six months
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Contender / Pro
0
1500
rating
0
debates
0.0%
won
Description
Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.
Send a message for questions on the topic.
Round 1
Before we proceed, I'm taking a survey on serious participants.
What drove you to accept to debate this topic?
What was or is your impression on this matter?
What drove you to accept to debate this topic?
I enjoy debate.
What was or is your impression on this matter?
I believe overpopulation is a problem, but I can debate either side.
Round 2
So over human population is a problem.
But can we make murder justified?
Well we can. We meaning those in power , in control of changing laws has technically made killing humans without self defense scenarios justified. Thus technically removing the label of murder itself but the nature of the act is still present.
So the agenda of the LGBT fits right in line with it.
Dietary industries and recreational drugs and alcohol, certain lifestyles are not circumvented and restrained.
Optimal health for humanity is not pushed in a society that believes you can have too many people in existence.
At what number do you draw the line in the human population?
Whatever it is, do you have to urge the next woman to give birth to not give birth?
Do you have such and such numbered person that just been put on life support to have a plug pulled without a chance?
If we're talking about family size restrictions, here's where we're thinking wrong that having children are not miracles.
Many people that have not been equipped with sustaining mankind, tried everything in the name of science, now have left it up to faith.
So at what point is there a cause to curb the population?
Was it to be curbed at your time to enter in existence?
Was it at the time of your mother's?
Was it your grand mother's?
Was it your great grand mother's?
You know there are wars, massacres, and all like that.
If human population was truly a problem, these events shouldn't be devastating breaking news.
It's not devastating breaking news if a land is over run with deer or was over ran as it serves mankind for sport and consumption.
If we were to begin to curb the human population , who do we begin with?
Where , who, status , class, etc. ?
Who came up with the population being an issue?
Where did the arguments come from?
The arguments that you the opposing side know of and will use, where you get them from?
What organizations, which groups fabricated them?
Are they tied to scientists, anthropologists, socialists, liberals, nihilists?
You know there are people, at least one individual on this site has argued nihilism. Death is a solution, suicide and mass destruction. Anti-human, pushing to do all you can to go against what you're biologically configured to be.
This person has argued that death or non existence is better than existing and that non existing is peaceful and is good over existing with pain or misery.
I suppose this gets more philosophical but I'm just deep diving into the roots of this nihilistic thinking of tampering with the numbers of vital life.
We have problems if there's too many of us I hear. There's this one man , author of a book in short called the code book in which incidentally talks about a system in where one "race" is out to destroy another either physically or in autonomy.
He says he believes we're here to solve problems. Now we have to be here to solve problems. We can't solve them while not being here . Attempting to curb a problem solver out of existence just dropped a domino to further problems.
This author has another subject in his book called population tailoring. This is where a "race" is systemically curbing the population of another via the agendas like I mentioned. Through polluting the air, the industries, foods and markets to select areas.
If the opposing side is down with over population, the opposing side might as well be in line with population tailoring. Again that's one "race" being able to dominate another at to the other's detriment, after birth or to the unborn, the system is in place to wipe out the dominated "races".
At the very least dwindle numbers.
Again, the agendas, the clinics, particular lifestyles, flooding communities with certain things. Selling illicit things, destroying property value and communities, causing destitution, little policing and self destruction.
I think I'll pause here .
Forfeited
Round 3
Do we have time here? Please if you don't, just step aside.
Forfeited
Round 4
I rest my case .
Forfeited
Round 5
Case closed.
I Mike Tyson these folks. The old iron Mike that is.
Forfeited
Not all human population is a problem.