Instigator / Pro
0
1420
rating
398
debates
44.1%
won
Topic
#5775
What President Trump can do and accomplish for you is ultimately what you think you'll get by voting for the opposite party.
Status
Voting
The participant that receives the most points from the voters is declared a winner.
Voting will end in:
00
DD
:
00
HH
:
00
MM
:
00
SS
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- Six months
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Contender / Con
1
1264
rating
363
debates
39.81%
won
Description
Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.
Send a message for questions on the topic.
Round 1
The opposing side which has to take the stance of voting for the liberal side , democratic side, for something you want, you can get with President Trump.
For instance, I ask the opposing side, do you believe in pro choice, the right to pregnancy abortion?
Do you believe in lower taxes, decreasing inflation and interest rates?
Do you believe in educating non "racial"- discrimination?
Do you believe in having no wars/ending war?
Do you want a reduction in crime?
These are big issues and topics to debate about.
Many of you know they are. It's the least of these that you may have an aversion and that will cause you to attempt to assassinate someone in a political campaign .
I believe the opposing side would want a McDonald's happy meal. We already have evidence that President Trump will serve that to the opposing side.
Does the opposing side want happiness?
Do you believe in happiness?
Do you want other people to be happy?
Let's talk.
I want trans rights.
Round 2
For instance, I ask the opposing side, do you believe in pro choice, the right to pregnancy abortion?
Do you believe in lower taxes, decreasing inflation and interest rates?
Do you believe in educating non "racial"- discrimination?
Do you believe in having no wars/ending war?
Do you want a reduction in crime?
Does the opposing side want happiness?
Do you believe in happiness?
Do you want other people to be happy?
People were very happy at that drive thru .
I want trans rights.
Can Trump protect rights of all trans people to transition as they want?
Round 3
The answer begins with you answering all those questions I asked first.
I already answered those questions by saying I only want trans rights to transition and I think I will get that by voting for Kamala.
Round 4
Well then you're in contradiction because to get trans rights you have to endorse all these other policies.
For instance, I ask the opposing side, do you believe in pro choice, the right to pregnancy abortion?
This is a right to people to include trans rights.
Do you believe in lower taxes, decreasing inflation and interest rates?
This is a benefit to people to include trans rights.
Do you believe in educating non "racial"- discrimination?
This is protection to people to include trans rights.
Do you believe in having no wars/ending war?
This is protection to people to include trans rights.
Do you want a reduction in crime?
This is protection to people to include trans rights.
Does the opposing side want happiness?
This would people to include trans rights.
Do you believe in happiness?
This would be people to include trans rights.
Do you want other people to be happy?
This would be people to include trans rights.
See you tried to be slick and cunning avoiding to answer the questions because you know you can get those things with President Trump.
Then you said "only want". Now you just hung yourself cutting out all these other issues that would affect trans rights.
Somebody told you "well played". You certainly well played yourself into my checkmate. That's checkmate.
Well then you're in contradiction because to get trans rights you have to endorse all these other policies
No, I dont need to endorse all these other policies, nor would endorsing those policies ensure right to transition which I believe I will get by voting Kamala.
I think you are confusing path for goal, a common fallacy.
Now, will Trump better ensure the right to transition? Because thats the goal I believe I will achieve the most by voting for Kamala.
Round 5
"No, I dont need to endorse all these other policies, nor would endorsing those policies ensure right to transition which I believe I will get by voting Kamala.
I think you are confusing path for goal, a common fallacy.
Now, will Trump better ensure the right to transition? Because thats the goal I believe I will achieve the most by voting for Kamala."
He will now because nobody else will now .
All you're doing is sticking your fingers in your ears.
We know all these issues I mentioned affect trans rights so to say you are for trans rights but don't support what will sustain them is in conflict. Just concede that you can't have one without the other.
He will now because nobody else will now .
No, Trump doesnt protect or even support the right to transition, not even close to the amount Kamala supports it.
The things you listed can exist even if right to transition doesnt, so they are not "one cannot exist without the other".
Thanks.
Well played!