Instigator / Pro
1
1420
rating
398
debates
44.1%
won
Topic
#5759
Atheists are best served to be liberals.
Status
Voting
The participant that receives the most points from the voters is declared a winner.
Voting will end in:
00
DD
:
00
HH
:
00
MM
:
00
SS
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 4
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- Six months
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Contender / Con
0
1500
rating
0
debates
0.0%
won
Description
Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.
Are there any questions?
Send a message. Send a message.
Round 1
Before we proceed, I'm taking a survey on serious participants.
What drove you to accept to debate this topic?
What was or is your impression on this matter?
I accepted this debate because I do not think that atheists are better served to be liberals. I felt I had enough knowledge on this topic, because I come from a family of atheists.
Round 2
On average if not every single atheist believes in the right to abortion.
The liberal left believes in the same. To be liberal is open to a lot of change and go away from conserving the tradition or foundation of many things.
So with that being said, people that are into religion which everybody actually is, people of God specifically are confined to that of the religion that they're involved in. It doesn't give much wiggle room to compromise and be accepting of every new thing that comes along in the way of societal acceptance. Not the true strict, wholesale religions, no. Not talking about the watered down "come as you are and stay as you are " treatment.
The true "narrow is the way" faiths that will not allow every which a way and people that may try it, may try to serve two masters are actually hypocrites.
You have religions that will teach you to be against many things as a collective. The atheists have spawned a religion to go opposite of that. They use the image of Satan to follow example of being an individual authority, your own power, own choice, not being a part of a collective.
Each and every individual has his or her own right. That's what liberalism does. What religion with God allows liberalism?
That's why it's more suitable for atheists with no God.
By the way, no such thing of separation of church and state. Stirring up the pot a bit, we have plenty of character space.
You tell people "no such condition as separation of church and state" and come back in a round and state what their response was if any.
The states still have religion. When they say "separation of church/religion and state", it's the religion of God.
So they remove the prayer sessions out of schools and project unproven evolution.
Pushing science, science, science as the beginning and end of all things, alpha and omega. That's unproven.
Evolution is unproven, big bang by itself unproven, non existence of God unproven. But they want prayer out of schools, God out of schools, evolution and science taught. It's just swapping one religion (atheism) for another.
The government and religion are not separate. The religion of liberalism is reigning dominant and that is best suited for atheists.
The government, the supreme court, the law ruled the religion of atheism as just that for taking a position on God.
Atheism is one of secular religions as atheists believe no God exists without evidence. Whereas agnostics take full blown rationale in not disbelieving for the same basis.
So there is no separation of church and state where the religion of liberalism exists for atheists that are just as religious.
I hope many readers see this and respond. As you may know or about to soon discover, this is an atheist liberal dominate website.
Atheism and liberalism go hand and hand. That's why even when the truth is there it doesn't even matter because it doesn't align.
You have liberals on this site so brainwashed, they think sexual reproduction function is subjective and according to whatever a person says it is. No it is a true standard for the function of sex.
I get asked, who am I to decide that that is what the function of sex is.
I am a human that didn't decide but a human body that has given itself the deciding inherent factor of doing what it is .
Are you really going to try to tell me it is my opinion that a sexual reproductive organ does what it does?
This liberalized programming won't work here because I am not of the sheeple people following society upon whatever the status quo is to a movement of happiness, gratification at hedonistic value in turn to be celebrated into pride parades , displays, walkways and runways.
See, strict, right, tight ,none lenient religions, particularly of God, reduce the public to certain conduct. The word "right" was a typo but I'll leave it, it's apropos.
Just having the thought now, following a societal construct, according to that is the standard. These people try to vilify what they think you are making standard but they actually are imposing their standard.
Make whatever way you want. The function is subjective. Utter nonsense. Whatever you desire the function to be. Utter nonsense. It is utter antithetical to liberalism. Liberalism let's you be as you are , stay as you are. Liberalism doesn't allow you to be godly. Atheists don't want to be godly. Why would they want to be something they don't believe in?
Then you have people on here confusing the masses with conservatives today being liberals and vice versa. Just more confusion like saying function is as arbitrary as what you say it is.
People saying liberals were conservatives. The two never mix. This is just like that biblical saying mixing it up , I say woe. Woe , when you here evil being called d good and good evil, woe, woe, woe.
So liberal, take away the religion of God out of schools, insert same sex education, insert, impose transgenderism on children.
Liberalism is not restricted to being one gender and never another at anytime. The religion of God does that, so how can that suit the atheist without God?
Would the atheist have to be a theist?
Is this why religious folks lean more to conservatism?
Is this why most likely a true Christian, Muslim, Hebrew Israelite will mostly align more or actually be conservative?
Forfeited
Round 3
I rest my case.
Forfeited
Round 4
I don't know about this person.
I will make reference to time with newcomers.
Forfeited
