America is responsible for terrorism
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 2 votes and with 5 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 2
- Time for argument
- One day
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
No information
F** from your given source (f** = fun , not take it anything else )
Extra things:
- One of the top profiteers from the Iraq War was oil field services corporation, Halliburton. Halliburton gained $39.5 billion in "federal contracts related to the Iraq war".
- Don't forget Osama bin Laden is friend of USA , who is the owner of al-Qaeda , Osama is good when , he do according to USA , and then USA make false statment of 9/11 and just destroy him.
- Human rights according to America is only for Americans , not for the Humans of Pakistan , Afganistan, Iraq , Syria , Palestine, Ymen, ... thats a fact.
- Libarty is not for sale for other third world countries , according to f*** America. Yeap i know sometimes America do some f** dramas to make them self but still true face is uncovered .
- What is Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombed for u my dear opponent ?
Notice:
I found that pro's arguments that america is terroristic was supported by his arguments about politically motivated violence both against native America and nations around the world and that con generally did not argue against the resolution and also provided a definition of terrorism that supported pro. https://youtu.be/r4RkZEBy7Jc
link is more spelled out response for that vote and expands on my reasoning
ARGUMENTS
Basically, Con tries to kritik the resolution of the debate. Effectively, Con asserts that because some terrorism in the world is not attributable to America, America cannot be responsible for all terrorism. The problem is that this kritik relies on an obtuse interpretation of the resolution. The resolution does not specify that ALL terrorism is a result of America, it simply implies that you could charge America (presumably the American government) with terrorism. I think this is the only fair interpretation of the resolution as it is written.
Pro puts forward a case which basically points to America's role in many events which led to the loss of life or grievous human suffering. He particularly emphasizes America's role in the Middle East (invasion of Iraq, support of Israel, invasion of Afghanistan).
Con changes tune in his R2 rebuttals. Instead of following through with his kritik, Con points to America's role in securing peace around the world. While this argument does mitigate the power of Pro's case, most examples of American terror brought up by Pro go completely unaddressed. I am left siding with Pro because a country abating terrorism in some circumstances does not preclude them from also spreading terror.
SOURCES
There were many extreme claims that Pro made where a source would have been helpful. If you want to say America lied about 9/11 to justify blowing up Osama bin Laden, go for it, but know that an extreme claim like that is going leave people wanting to check your work. Pro also linked to a Google search in his R1. Con definitely did better regarding his sources, but the disparity is not great enough to justify assigning the point.
LEGIBILITY
Where to begin. Spelling, grammatical, and formatting errors/inconsistencies make Pro's arguments nearly unreadable at times. There are probably a dozen or so blatant in Pro's first two sentences, which I will paste below:
"America is the land which is counqure by the terrorists , pirates , brutel , Greedy , hungry peoples and european nations . The land of America colored by the innocent blood of Native americans."
are you syrian, French or Chilean? I have it narrowed to those 3 but think Syrian
Dear Readers and My Respected opponent , kindly ignore spell , grammer mistakes in my statments , i appreciate u for that patientence and ignorance on my mistake .
i get what u say
A better title might be “ America is responsible for the 9/11 attacks.
You can’t argue that America is responsible for all terrorism.
I used to think a lot about a book called blowback or some similar title that argued the same point.