The United States should nuke Germany (see description for full resolution)
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 1 vote and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 4
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
full resolution: In the scenario where the following conditions exist, Germany should be nuked into oblivion
1. There exists a man in Germany who has a 1 in a million chance at creating a doomsday device who will destroy the world if successful
2. The identity of the guy is unknown but he is definitely in Germany and a nuke would definitely kill him
3. This does not set up a chain reaction that causes any countries to begin nuking others other than those of us nuking Germany
Rules
1. No kritiks
2. You must be male and have an IQ of 120 or above or you forfeit a conduct point
3. no counterplans, like for example (We should compel everyone to suicide in Germany)
4. Stick with the intent of the debate as I am already accepting a massive burden of proof
5. I am allowed to use youtube videos to make my argument that I make for the purposes of this debate
The reason I remade this debate is because I don't think my other opponent will post a round. He is active on the site but likely just accepted the debate to waste my time and forfeit. so whoever is not him may accept this debate
The second rule is to avoid debating people not good at logic
Question on what the incentive behind the second rule is?
i forgot about this debate because i was busy this week, sorry for forfeiting the round.
I gave a rebuttle for my own argument. Maybe you can learn something https://youtu.be/EWjKyqjYrCo
If not than good luck in your next debate. Looking forward to seeing you around
Alright, thanks for the recommendation.
I would look at "Pascal's mugging" for a rebuttal if you feel like putting up a fight
ive realized that this debate is impossible to win and would unfortunately like to forfeit.
Statistically, this favors Pro alone.
You end up saving more lives if you nuke when each option is summed up.
I’d accept this one if I had more time on my hands. Sounds like a fun expanded trolley problem.