Instigator / Pro
0
1389
rating
413
debates
44.55%
won
Topic
#5626

Guns are no more hazardous than knives , matches, paper and thumb tacs.

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Winner
0
1

After 1 vote and with 1 point ahead, the winner is...

Owen_T
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
One week
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
1
1465
rating
34
debates
57.35%
won
Description

Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.

Guns are no more hazardous than knives , matches, paper and thumb tacs

Questions on the topic, send a message.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:

At round 2, Pro "pussied" out after when Pro used very "hazardous" and scary numbers. Pro then decided to "rest his case" when the debate was not even over, afterwards providing no more coherent or logical arguments than Con but rather personal whims and unsportsmanlike arguments.

Before Round 2, Con had the most advantage in arguments, also for the words used in the arguments and letters (especially numbers) that are backed up by data and evidence.

This debate is very ambiguous, yes. But Con's empirical support overweighs the bullshit Pro has already spewed that already lacks logical sense.

I have explained more of my current vote in the commons, check them out for a clearer perspective on why I chose Con.