Instigator / Pro
0
1258
rating
367
debates
39.65%
won
Topic
#5591
Trans children are valid
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After not so many votes...
It's a tie!
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Contender / Con
0
1500
rating
8
debates
31.25%
won
Description
No information
Round 1
Are you valid?
Validity is but in the eye of the validatorÂ
Round 2
Trans children have feelings.
If I troll the troller am I the troller?
Round 3
People own their bodies. So children own their bodies too.
Satan owns everyones bodies, Satan stronk
Round 4
I am the smartest person on Earth. So you either concede that children own their bodies, or you concede that I get to decide because I am smartest. Since there is no logical reason that anyone else would get to decide, this is very much a win for me either way.
Hey if you are so smart tell me which compound has the higher boiling point- TRANS butene or CIS butene?
Round 5
I accept your concession.
I troll the troller, I win
Warning--IF ANYONE WHO SEES THIS DEBATE DOESN'T VOTE ME, REMEMBER SATAN WILL COME....
Well, give me a better one.
Can you remove that definition?
I have a better one.
They are as sound as anyone else.
I don't know, they seem pretty quiet to me... 🔕
Ok, but their gender is not an assumption.
Maybe something like,
Valid: The property of being real and correct. In this case, Trans children are whatever gender they assume.
But what definition should I use?
Yes, they are.
But are they sound?
Might be a good idea to define valid.
No, I will let you define it.
Can you define "valid"