Instigator / Con
0
1389
rating
413
debates
44.55%
won
Topic
#5546

You can present a strong argument against the spirit of God existing..

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Winner
0
0

After not so many votes...

It's a tie!
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
One week
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Pro
0
1493
rating
17
debates
35.29%
won
Description

Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.

Now it's pretty much impossible to provide proof of a negative. At least in this case .

So I tailored the topic for someone that can make a strong atheist argument.

Burden is completely on the pro side. Please answer all questions with an applicable yes or no. Be concise in layman's terms and not so much technical.

Questions on the topic, send a message.

In the forum y'all show up. Don't be scared here. I'm no challenge am I?

Do you mean to tell me there's not one atheist on here that can defend the stance of atheism?

There are atheists on this site aren't there?

Questions on the topic, send a message.

-->
@Mall

Not to be super nit picky or anything, but by god, do you mean strictly Christian god, or any god? Also, “strong argument” is pretty ambiguous.

I tweak the title to give folks a better understanding of what the previous one was. It's not about disproving God but proposing a strong argument.

So you can validly say or say that God is false. Not prove, but say it .

That was the meaning behind that former title ok.

-->
@Mall

This is ridiculous. How is anyone supposed to argue against this? You can almost never prove a negative, so this is pretty favored to you. Just saying.