Instigator / Pro
25
1498
rating
32
debates
67.19%
won
Topic
#5396
Con is a piece of shit
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 4 votes and with 7 points ahead, the winner is...
WyIted
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Rated
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 200
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
- Minimal rating
- None
Contender / Con
18
1517
rating
15
debates
50.0%
won
Description
Rules
1. Only a piece of shit can accept this debate
2. If you accept the debate and are not a piece of shit you have violated rule one and will be disqualified. Judges are instructed to vote pro if that happens
Round 1
You are not a piece of shit. That counts as a forfeit. I advise everyone to vote pro based on con violating the rules of the debate.
How can voters apply the rules to me if they have no way of verifying if I am a piece of shit or not?
My side requires I disagree that I am a piece of shit, but the BOP is on Pro.
But Pro admits defeat.
Round 2
con is a piece of shit by accepting the debate or he is a piece of shit for violating the rules. if he disagrees than judges need to disqualify him because accepting as a non P.O.S. violates the rules
Which one is it though? Make a choice already, you dingleberry.
You still have to prove it either way.
This Round 2 concession retraction is exactly the kind of indecisiveness I expect from this turd.
Round 3
No rebuttals from con. My argument that he is a P.O.S as agreed upon by the rules makes me the winner and if the voters disagree that he is a P.O.S. that counts as a forfeit from con
Pro failed the BOP, concedes the debate, and retracts it in the second round.
Without knowing if or which rule was violated, voters can't penalize me.
Even if they could, it should be a conduct point.
-> “ what. pro offered zero proof”
Your vote has been deleted for vagueness. This wasn’t much of a debate, so little more is needed, but the debate isn’t an obvious foregone conclusion to allow for such little consideration.
Thanks for the votes
If I am losing by the time the voting period ends than I also want the debate removed
I report this debate as violating the truism and/or unlosable rule of debate.
This is unwinnable for the contender lol
Some people.make a rule "no kritiks" I just make a 200 character limit
200 character limit… very tight
As long as there is some fight against the rule to justify ignoring it. Also sometimes I ignore BOP claims if op doesn't bring it up within the debate but I normally agree with it. I don't usually report votes and if you provide justification consistent with your philosophy for ignoring the rule than I won't bitch
Wondering what Hero is going to respond to that with
aren't you the guy who says if the rules are bs, voters are free to ignore them?