Best.Korea should be banned from this website.
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 2 votes and with 2 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Vote PRO if you think that Best.Korea should leave DebateArt.com.
Description says "Vote PRO if you think that Best.Korea should leave DebateArt.com."
I think that Best.Korea can stay on this website for as long as Best.Korea wants. My thought, I claim, should be against the description thereby I state that my thought is against the description.
He's just fun to have around and can be very reasonable at times.
Thankfully the debate ended with what it should have been instead of a debate, a simple request for BK to not participate in debates from the instigator.
Mostly this debate was non sequitur, which is to say the conclusion does not follow.
"Some users put hours of work into their arguments.
Best.Korea usually responds with only a sentence.
This is ridiculous and it needs to stop."
Right here is a good example, since the conclusion of outright banning someone rather than getting them to change, is quite the leap into faith.
Of course BK builds off of his point about "effortless arguing" with a two word reply "I disagree." I don't have to like this to see that it is arguments, and further the argument the instigator requested.
Gish Golloped lists of forum posts, don't highlight problems to me (voters need not open every link, in fact reading into links too much can be problematic).
Of course, yes, BK is pretty vile. It may be useful to compare banning to the death penalty (extreme I know), if someone should be punished as such, it should be about more than just moral outrage that we dislike them. Laws they've broken, harm they inflict, benefit if they were not taking out oxygen, etc.
A surefire path to victory would have been reviewing the rules for banning someone, and finding say three good and recent offenses worthy of a short term ban (the resolution did not specify how long).
Best.Korea is fun to have around. His humour definitely has supported those who are under extreme stress. Best.Korea radiates potential.
Thanks for voting.
A simple block button anyone can use would prevent me from accepting their debates.
They dont even have to bother to ask me.
Of course, if someone asks me not to accept his debates, I wont.
I am cool with it.
Technically a callout debate, but BK seems cool with it.
Well, still, I must thank you again.
Thanks to you, I might recover my old skills I used in those old debates.
I even forgot about them, but now that I read them, I see that they are trully great and I was better debater then than I am now.
Nobody.
Nobody debates like you, and that's for a good reason.
Thanks, I appreciate the insult, but really, you gotta give me some compliment there.
How many people do you see debating like that?
Your debates are the furthest thing from art.
Thanks for reminding me of my old debates.
Really, those are pure art.
Sadly, I somehow lost ability to write like that again, since I stopped after being banned for it once and my skills got forgotten and lost.
Its been a long time since I used my skills in writing.
I am wondering if I should troll this, ignore it or take it seriously, or all of these.