Causal Debate: It's better to be a night person than a morning person
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 1 vote and with 4 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Two hours
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
I designed the debate this way because it's easier to commit to it with the other commitments I have outside of this site. I realized that I have a problem with actually engaging in the debates I join. Because I keep joining a debate knowing that I have other demanding activities throughout my day, I often end up forfeiting my rounds, which isn't fair to my opponents who take time out of their day to give an argument. So, to ensure that I'm able to fully commit, I've made the debate only three rounds and the time for argument two hours so it can go by quicker. This is a causal debate, so personal experiences and opinions are encouraged. Evidence, while it can strengthen the argument, is not required. The point is to just have fun with this. Whoever wants to accept this debate, please let me know in the comments before you do, and make sure to accept it in the afternoon, since that's when I can access my computer. I don't want to accidentally forfeit.
Here are the definitions used in this topic:
Morning Person (noun)
Definition: someone who feels awake and full of energy in the mornings
Night Person (noun)
Definition: a person who likes the night : person who has the most energy at night
Morning Person (noun)Definition: someone who feels awake and full of energy in the morningsNight Person (noun)Definition: a person who likes the night: person who has the most energy at night
Night owls will develop heart disease and diabetes, early birds are healthier and don't have health problems.
By extend, do you mean, you need more time for your argument?