Leftists are Pussies

Debate Resolution: "Resolved, that Leftism embodies a form of slave morality when applied in the political realm."

Make no mistake, the modern left is the woke left and my burden is to prove the majority of leftists in this country have adopted slave morality.

Slave morality looks to create a dichotomy of good and evil by classifying people in two distinct groups. 

• Slave morality looks to create a dichotomy of good and evil by classifying people in two distinct groups based on inherent qualities making them superior or inferior.
  
• Egalitarianism is the doctrine that all people are equal and deserve equal rights and opportunities.
  
• If you are a leftist and believe that all people are EQUAL, then you cannot simultaniously believe that people can be classified as superior or inferior.
  

The weakness of liberals is scientific fact. They really are pussies. The stronger males were more likely to be right wing. 

• PRO has not demonstrated that leftists consider themselves inferior because of lack of muscle mass, nor that this is a feature of Leftism.
  
• The same applies to his claims regarding attractiveness.
  

Perhaps a genetically inferior male in the days of our ancestors would have no welfare, no ability to have roofing and food, this would limit their prospective partners.

• FACT: In prehistoric times, when life was the toughest it would ever be, societies were egalitarian.
  
• Early men and women were equal. "A study has shown that in contemporary hunter-gatherer tribes, men and women tend to have equal influence on where their group lives and who they live with. The findings challenge the idea that sexual equality is a recent invention"
  
• The most successfull tribes operated with lots of egalitarian policies. 
  
• Sharing and Cooperation: For the majority of human history, people lived in egalitarian societies where sharing and cooperation were the norm. Hierarchy, inequality, and oppression were virtually unheard of.
  
• Optimal Power-Sharing Arrangement: Egalitarianism emerged as the optimal power-sharing arrangement in early human societies, driven by punishment for exhibiting alpha-like behavior and as a pre-condition for adaptation of tools as weapons
  
• CONCLUSION: PRO is completely wrong. A genetically inferior male in the days of our ancestors WOULD have gotten food, sexual partners and a role in decision making.
  

In a society where things are brutal, you will have the unfit die in large numbers to avoid society being overrun by genetic freaks

Let’s just say the reduction of infant mortality from 40% in the 1800s to the 1% it is today, has been a disaster to the human race

The mutants are officially free riders to a system that greater people have built for them. They benefit from the hard work, ingenuity and good morals of the genetically superior and because they feel bad for being genetically inferior they become spiteful of society and those better than them. 

• Those with higher education consistently have leftist viewpoints. Higher education means you perform high-skilled labour. Why would these people view themself as inferior?
  
• PRO is standing on the shoulders of giants just as everyone else. Does PRO feel bad because he is inferior to Newton? Or because he hasn't invented a cure for cancer? 
  
• PRO has not defined what these "mutants" are or why they aren't usefull to society. Is he talking about the disabled?
  
• Conservatives, not leftists, deny women the right to abort children with genetic defects or disabilities.
  
• After they are born, people with genetif defencts or disabilities can still contribute to society.
  
• Has PRO never heard of the legend Stephen Hawking who revolutionized cosmology despite of his disability. 
  
• Does PRO consider himself superior to Stephen Hawking only because he was a "mutant"?
  

The mutants will attempt to create more genetic dead ends such as themselves by promoting homosexuality.

The advantaged people are always the oppressor and the disadvantaged is always the oppressed.

• In slave morality some people are thought to be born superior because of their traits such as strengt, power and nobility
  
• In leftist theory, all people are equal. But some people are advantaged not because of their genetic superiority but because of the privilege they were born with:
  
• Having rich parrents is the biggest indicator of future wealth, regardless of your genetic quality.
  
• If you get born into generational poverty, you cannot simply pull yourself up by your bootstraps. Generational poverty affects millions of families worldwide. It refers to when poverty has become a familial pattern for at least two generations, although it typically affects multiple generations.
  
• Rich genetically inferior babies are way more likely to succeed than poor genetically superior babies. 
  

“he is commited to saying that ALL Leftist ideology is slave morality”

“The mutant will often undermine things like religion, which is nothing more than an evolutionary mechanism that helps to create in group bias to better promote a groups well being and repel outside invaders. The mutants will attempt to create more genetic dead ends such as themselves by promoting homosexuality” (5 from R1)

“If PRO views homosexuals as having genetic defects, then why should we tell them to marry the opposite sex and procreate”

“Leftism is not the same as leftists. PRO has to demonstrate that all instances of Leftist ideology embodies "slave morality", not that "leftists" have adopted it.”

“PRO has not demonstrated that leftists consider themselves inferior because of lack of muscle mass, nor that this is a feature of Leftism. The same applies to his claims regarding attractiveness.”

“Perhaps a genetically inferior male in the days of our ancestors would have no welfare, no ability to have roofing and food, this would limit their prospective partners.”

“PRO has not defined what these "mutants" are or why they aren't useful to society. Is he talking about the disabled?”

It would be an unfair burden in the debate for me to prove that every incidence of leftism follows.

PRO says that "The left  in prior generations may have been mostly socialists and communists but today's left is primarily woke individuals" which is an implicit admission that he views socialists and communists as not being pussies, probably because they are assertive, aggressive and strong.

I submit that badasses like Che Guevara are actual leftists. The people that PRO is complaining about are right-wing actually, they only appear as leftists to him because of the american overton window. They don't want true impactfull equality they just want healthcare and police that don't shoot people on the streets. 

When you consider the contradiction between egalitarianism and slave morality it seems evident that nobody can be a leftist if they hold to slave morality. If you actually believe that you are inferior and that people are oppressed because of their genetic inferiority, then it doesn't make sense to fight for equality.

What con is referring to is how leftism sees itself. Leftists see themselves as egalitarians.

There is a difference between how leftists see themselves and their philosophies and how those philosophies are put into practice and the hidden motivations behind that. 

what you do have is a bunch of mutants promoting homosexuality which may contain mutants that are both heterosexual and homosexual and who subconsciously are doing so to remove superior DNA from the gene pool by blocking efforts to procreate by men who absent social pressures to become gay would in fact live a heterosexual lifestyle

• PRO says that leftists promote homosexuality in order to make heterosexuals gay and prevent the spread of their superior genes.
  
• Meaning that heterosexuals who get "pressured" into being gay on average have higher rates of superior DNA than the average population.
  
• Someone who is easily "pressured" into switching sexual orientation cannot be categorized as "strong" or "noble" under Nietzche's framework.
  

• MORE LIES: People who support the LGBTQ community, including 80% of Americans and 66% of Republicans, are not "a bunch of mutants".
  
• PRO is pulling shit from his ass. 
  

So in the mind of a leftist they are egalitarians, but in reality they insist on talking down to minorities and women and lowering standards to allow diverse peoples to replace those with high IQs, physical ability and competence in desirable jobs. 

• Egalitarianism is the idea that people should be treated as equals, should treat one another as equals, should relate as equals, or enjoy an equality of social status of some sort. Egalitarian doctrines tend to rest on a background idea that all human persons are equal in fundamental worth or moral status. [Stanford]
  
• Slave morality asserts that people should NOT have the same fundamental worth or moral status. It asserts that the "superior" are "evil" and should have lower status.
  

Leftism and left can be used interchangeably for the most part.

• The overton window means that politicians are limited in what policy ideas they can support — they generally only pursue policies that are widely accepted throughout society as legitimate policy options. The american overton window has been pushed to the very right by the red scare and other factors.
  

It doesn’t matter what they believe on a conscious level.

...

By the way, it is the self awareness of being parasitic as to what makes them spiteful mutants who push for societal pressures that harm the strong. 

• PRO says that being self-aware of supposed inferiority is what makes you spitefull and incentivices you to endorse slave morality.
  
• PRO also says that what they believe consciously (what they are aware of about themselves) doesn't matter, when it is literally the crux of his argument.
  

There is a reason he adopted feminine thinking on gender equality as a means to get laid.

The reason for me showing statistical and scientific evidence of leftist inferiority, is merely to help the judges realize why leftists would adopt slave morality.

Numerous studies have also been done which prove that men have twice as many female ancestors as male ancestors. (6) This disparity exists because genetic freaks who could not get laid have always existed

• His own source says that this disparity is caused by women having biological constraints on the number of children they can bear. A genetically superior female can not get thousands of children, because they cannot live 9000 months. Ghengis Khan can get thousands of children because he is a reasonably fertile MALE.
  
• PRO is unable or unwilling to be honest with intepreting his sources.
  

If you watch the show my 500 pound life, you will see a bunch of genetic freaks who are a burden on the system and their loved ones, and these are generally leftists

• Republicans/conservatives ate fewer servings and fewer varieties of fruit and vegetables; ate more high fat and processed foods; and engaged in less in-depth health information searches compared to Democrats/liberals. Also, conservatives had lower odds of exercise participation than liberals; https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29940293/
  
• we found that higher county-level obesity prevalence rates were associated with higher levels of support for the 2012 Republican Party presidential candidate. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4692249/
  
• Collectively, these data exhibit a strong pattern: counties that voted Republican in the 2016 election had overall worse health outcomes than those that voted Democrat. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0254001
  
• A recent study published by the BMJ — formerly the British Medical Journal — shows that mortality rates are higher among Republican counties than in Democratic counties. The study measured the mortality gap between the two parties through five presidential elections from 2001 to 2019 and showed that in the early 2000s, the risk of death between both groups was similar. However, even as the country’s overall mortality rate decreased in the years since, the improvement was twice as good for Democratic counties as for Republican counties. Some might assume the study’s findings should be attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic.  After all, Republicans have been more than twice as likely to die of COVID-19 than Democrats due to lower vaccination rates and eschewing some public health measures. However, Republicans have fared worse in other health measurements and for much longer than the duration of the pandemic. 
  
• Per the authors of the study, since 2001 Republican counties also experienced worse health outcomes in terms of suicide rates, firearm-related deaths, cancer mortality rates, deaths from heart disease, drug overdose deaths, infant mortality rates and the number of fatal auto accidents.
  

• TRUE LEFTISTS want this food to not be overconsumed by a few Americans, they want the food to be eaten by homeless children and starving people in the third world.
  

There are other types of genetic freaks. Blue haired lesbians for example, they know no man would choose to reproduce with them so they hope to deprive fit men of worthy women by promoting homosexuality as a lifestyle to them and railing against women who do not put career first. 

 I explained how the left divided the world into oppressors and oppressed

The left would not raise up the poor or weak or marginalized to create equality but take down those who are better off.

Leftism = A political ideology that generally advocates for social equality, government intervention in the economy, and progressive social policies. It often includes a focus on addressing issues related to inequality, social justice, and environmental sustainability.

“I extend that Leftism is way more accurately reflected in people like Che Guevara and the enormous historical movements they were a part of than the modern democrats.”

“Someone who is easily "pressured" into switching sexual orientation cannot be categorized as "strong" or "noble" under Nietzche's framework”

“You can be egalitarian AND believe that people have different physical and mental abilities, but that fundamental worth is not reliant on those qualities”

“PRO says that being self-aware of supposed inferiority is what makes you spitefull and incentivices you to endorse slave morality.

PRO also says that what they believe consciously (what they are aware of about themselves) doesn't matter

“disparity is caused by women having biological constraints on the number of children they can bear. A genetically superior female can not get thousands of children, because they cannot live 9000 months. Ghengis Khan can get thousands of children because he is a reasonably fertile MALE.”

"mutants" refers to obese and unhealthy people for the purpose of this debate.”

Incorrect, they can be inferior for a lot of reasons including but not solely inferior genetic makeup or being unhealthy. What con is doing is trying to remove all nuance from this debate in a series or strawman arguments, instead of engaging with what I am saying. His efforts are geared towards attempting an easy win as opposed to actually debating.

“ the truth being the EXCACT OPPOSITE of what he is claiming. Unhealthy and obese people are generally REPUBLICAN.”

“PRO is once again pulling nonsense out of his ass. He has no source for these claims and they don't even make sense”

“Leftism views oppression as a ARBITRARY SOCIAL STRUCTURE while slave morality views oppression as a NATURAL EFFECT of superior/inferior genetics.”

“The left would not raise up the poor or weak or marginalized to create equality but take down those who are better off.” “citation needed”

Leftism is defined in the description. Con accepted the definition by accepting the debate.

Freud theorized that most male children want to have sex with their mother and see their father as rival. Freud wasn’t talking about what happens on a conscious level but in the subconscious.

If the behaviors of the left (In general) appear to be the embodiment of slave morality, I win.

Anyone with a brain would interpret the resolution to mean most instances of leftism. 

I can’t possibly be expected to memorize the millions of philosophies that consider themselves leftist and apply any standard that every variation can meet.

It is unfair to try and interpret the resolution in a way con knows is incorrect. 

Instead he acknowledges my interpretation of the resolution is the correct one by engaging with me at all on the basis of my understanding of the resolution. 

1. CON submits that not all instances of leftism embodies slave morality
   
2. CON submits an uncontested argument that most instances of leftism are VERY DIFFERENT from modern american leftism, and are not embodying slave morality.
   
3. CON also argues that PRO has not proved that democrats embody slave morality, and that the majority of claims he makes about them are UNFOUNDED LIES.
   

Leftist ideology is not slave morality.

• REMINDER: This is the Oxford Definition of Embody: to be an expression of or give a tangible or visible form to (an idea, quality, or feeling).
  
• Voters will note that if leftist ideology IS NOT slave morality then it makes no sense for it to be an embodiment of that idea. 
  

I have no doubt that plenty of communists are bad asses. The debate is about the broad trends in leftism not whether some individuals are bad asses.

• Oxford definition of Badass: tough, uncompromising, or intimidating.
  
• CON submits that the socialist movement is overwhelmingly TOUGH, UNCOMPROMISING and INTIMIDATING towards the ruling class.
  
• CON therefore argues that generally speaking, the movements making up LEFTISM are badass, regardless of whether you agree with their ideas.
  

You can be strong and noble and yet be in a situation where society has conditioned you to be Gay.

• Someone who is not able or willing to express their TRUE sexual orientation is not STRONG or NOBLE.  
  

We also have the possibility that many of the people who become gay don't fall into the false dichotomy of master/slave morality that con is attempting to impose.

It's disgusting for a leftist to downplay their competence because they believe African Americans have lower levels of mental abilities.

If con is admitting different mental abilities than it destroys his arguments that egalitarianism and slave morality are mutually exclusive.

You would have to be aware at some level of your own inferiority in order to adopt slave morality.

• Assuming voters believe PRO has proved democrats to be inferior, PRO has still not proved that they are aware of this. 
  
• I extend that Leftism is based on EGALITARIANISM, that everyone has equal value and social worth. 
  
• It is not a no true scotsman fallacy to say that NO TRUE SCOTSMAN IS WELSH, because those are mutually exclusive categories. 
  
• Similarly, it is not a no true scotsman fallacy to say that NO TRUE EGALITARIAN divides people into GOOD and EVIL based on perceived genetic traits.
  

Self awareness doesn't always happen on a conscious level. In fact it usually doesn’t. 

You judge whether a person holds onto slave morality because conscious actions betray this subconscious state. (see Freud)

Why are you trying to argue against something  as obvious as the fact that socially awkward ,weak or broke guys will will struggle to get laid.

Women have higher standards than males who will pretty much be okay with putting their dick in anything.

I never stated that a lot or even the majority of republicans aren’t the embodiment of slave morality.

“PRO is once again pulling nonsense out of his ass. He has no source for these claims and they don't even make sense”

This was posted in response to me saying that homosexuality is accepted by the left. Try not to laugh

The genetic inferiority was mentioned by me to explain why the left may feel or realize they are inferior.

tax policies are proposed by arguing not for the need for more government funding but as a way to harm the wealthy.

the attempt to go after Israel for accidental civilian deaths as opposed to Hamas

It is unfair to try and interpret the resolution in a way con knows is incorrect. 

Leftist ideology is not slave morality.

We also have the possibility that many of the people who become gay don't fall into the false dichotomy of master/slave morality

• That means he has to PROVE not only that leftists in general are inferior, but that they are aware of their own inferiority. This he has not done.
  

 I never limited leftism to be exclusive to American leftism. We are merely discussing the broad strokes of leftism.

• In R1 PRO wrote about "the majority of the left that you see today which is a small but growing segment of the Democratic party."
  
• So PRO DID try to move the goalpost by limiting "the broad strokes of leftism" to be exclusively about American Leftism.
  

• PRO thus conceedes that the scope of his BoP is NOT limited to only modern american leftism. He has to show how MOST instances of leftism embody slave morality. 
  
• PRO has not proved anything about leftism in general. He has tried to prove something about a very specific instance of leftism in america, what he calls "woke".
  
• Most instances of leftism fall OUTSIDE off America. America + Western Europe still doesn't contain 50% of leftism, just look at CHINA.
  
• PRO NEVER analysed any form of non-american leftism in his arguments. He NEVER refers to any political party except for the american ones.
  
• So PRO has not met the BoP that he himself conceeded that he had. Any further arguments against his case is OVERKILL!
  

he has no objections to my premise that the subconscious exists and is responsible for a lot of our behavior.

Slave morality as described earlier is the collectivization of the weak against the strong.

• PRO is once again LYING and CONTRADICTING himself:
  
• In R1 PROsaid that "Slave morality is the morality of the weak. Slave morality looks to create a dichotomy of good and evil by classifying people in two distinct groups."
  
• In R2 PRO said that "Master morality defines morality through things like strength and nobility and to a large extent slave morality is the opposite of this."
  
• So slave morality is the specific belief that STRENGHT and NOBILITY makes you evil, while HUMILITY and MEEKNESS makes you good.
  
• Egalitarianism is the specific belief that everyone is MORALLY AND SOCIALLY EQUAL despite having different traits like strenght vs empathy.
  

1. For BLM protestors the oppressors are cops because the cops arrest black people at disproportionate numbers

• Which is different from saying that cops are oppressors based solely on their "strenght, power and nobility" which is what slave-morality would say. 
  

2. Israel is successful and therefore according to leftists an oppressor, and since Palestinians are poor and have hard lives that makes them good and incapable of evil.

If somebody is conditioned to be homosexual than they are expressing their true sexual orientation by being homosexual. 

• That makes no sense. TRUE sexual orientation is the one you would have abscent any conditioning. For example:  animals are homosexual even without any conditioning.
  

Leftists believe women are physically equal to men

• Maybe STUPID leftists believe that.
  
• PRO has no evidence that MOST INSTANCES of leftism hold this view, or even that that MOST DEMOCRATS believe this. 
  

then why do they insist on lowering physical standards

• Because they DON'T believe that women are identical to men. They believe that women have EQUAL WORTH, which is completely different.
  

you will see a bunch of genetic freaks who are a burden on the system and their loved ones, and these are generally leftists

• PRO copy pastes his LIE from R2, completely disregarding the FACT that these people are generally republicans, not leftist.
  

who would promote things like free healthcare because it takes resources from those more fit and redistributes them to dysgenic freeloaders

• PRO is asserting that leftists want universal health coverage, not because quality accessible health care is the foundation for individuals to lead productive and fullfilling lives and for countries to have strong economies, but because they just hate the "fit" and love "dysgenic freeloaders". Again he has no source and it doesn't make sense.
  

The judges should be exclusively focusing on whether con better explained these groups' behaviors