We are all enslaved, let alone the prison penal system being slavery.

We are all

• Since he did not narrow it down any further, this means the resolution is refering to ALL HUMANS TODAY
  

Enslaved,

• To be enslaved means to have a master that OWNS you.
  

 let alone the prison penal system being slavery.

• I think he is refering to the FORCED LABOUR in American prisons, and he must demonstrate that this is actually SLAVERY
  

Do you think you're free because of no physical shackles, chains and cage ?

• Yes, that is literally what freedom means.
  

There is general agreement among historians, anthropologists, economists, sociologists, and others who study slavery that most of the following characteristics should be present in order to term a person a slave. The slave was a species of property; thus, he belonged to someone else. In some societies slaves were considered movable property, in others immovable property, like real estate. They were objects of the law, not its subjects. Thus, like an ox or an ax, the slave was not ordinarily held responsible for what he did. He was not personally liable for torts or contracts. The slave usually had few rights and always fewer than his owner, but there were not many societies in which he had absolutely none. As there are limits in most societies on the extent to which animals may be abused, so there were limits in most societies on how much a slave could be abused. The slave was removed from lines of natal descent. Legally, and often socially, he had no kin. No relatives could stand up for his rights or get vengeance for him. As an “outsider,” “marginal individual,” or “socially dead person” in the society where he was enslaved, his rights to participate in political decision making and other social activities were fewer than those enjoyed by his owner. The product of a slave’s labour could be claimed by someone else, who also frequently had the right to control his physical reproduction.

People that can't accept slavery just meaning no freedom in short summary is because otherwise they'd be forced with a harsher reality

• PRO accuses the dictionary, which is an inanimate object, of being motivated by fear. 
  
• PRO believes that reality itself becomes harsher if we change how we define slavery. 
  
• As if people can't realize the problems with capitalism without calling it literal slavery
  

• No sources
  
• No definitions
  
• Nonsensical framework
• Moved the goalpost from round 1
• Terrible arguments that are pure semantics, even though he doesn't even have a defininition to back up his semantics
  
• Nonsensical rebuttals, such as considering "living in a ranch your entire life with servants" as being a slave because you have to pay the servants and physically move to eat 
  
• Terrible formatting
  
• Accuses me of being unfair and calling the use of definitions, reasonable frameworks and sources "excuses" and "whining"
  
• Claims I only disagree with him because I am afraid of "a harsher reality"
  
• Terrible overall conduct