God Exists Le Quatrieme
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After not so many votes...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- One day
- Max argument characters
- 250
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Pro
As a proponent you are declaring the statement of a god existence to be true. This debate will request that you provide evidence of this claim. The proof have to be verifiable and cannot be based on faith. A "prove he does not exists" will not be accepted as the basis of the debate is validation of a claim and not invalidation of a claim.
Con
This person is one who does accept the statement. This person will provide their reasoning for not accepting the claim and reasoning for not accepting the claim. The focus of this person is to provide understandable reasons for not believing in the existence of a god.|
Now the last debate had the pro enter pages of "proof" to their claim. all of it was assumptions and the result was that god must exists.
I will not accept any assumptions. Attempting to provide rational explanations without validation is invalid. If you make a claim provide explicit evidence of the claim.
Also - I want simple direct evidence - I don't want to read pages for a claim and in the end just see assumptions. Please provide the concrete evidence that I requested.
you have other means to prove the existence of Ryan Remolds. And the aspect of possibilities is noy the the point of the debate. The whole point of requesting tat god show themselves is based on the abilities claimed by this entity. They should be able to do so. But again we are not validating possibilities,
I'll try to fit what I can. Doesn't leave much room to counter but what I have to say is substantial . It'll pretty much counter simultaneously.
The opposing side I suspect doesn't really want to face this debate. The more they limit what can be said the less can be explained that would make it that much harder to refute the explanation.
As many times I have requested Ryan Reynolds to show himself - he did not. So the conclusion is that I cannot validate the existence of Ryan Reynolds.