The finality of death 2
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 1 vote and with 4 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- One day
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Stupid atheists cannot accept obvious truth, blindly following their preachers. After all, it is obvious that death is not infinity, that is, as atheists say, the end where you forever lose consciousness, memory and thoughts. If that were the case, you would already be dead. It doesn’t matter how long you live, a second or a century, infinity will swallow everything up. Thus, if you are not dead now, but alive, then this proves that you will never die in the future. And the fact that life is eternity, and death is only a moment for the transition to true life. Checkmate, atheists! Oh, that is, autistic people.
Pro has forfeited the debate without presenting any arguments or evidence. This shows a lack of respect for the topic and the opponent. Con, on the other hand, has made a serious effort to engage with the issue. Forfeiting a debate that one initiates is unprofessional and unacceptable. Pro deserves an F, not only for failing to participate in the debate but also for using hateful language and being unprofessional. I urge Pro to reconsider their misguided opinions. Con deserves an A for being respectful and courteous, unlike Pro, and for trying to take the debate seriously. I praise Con for his professional conduct.
Done with college apps, also, what the fuck.