Resolved: The UNSC's Veto Power Ought To Be Abolished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 3 votes and with the same amount of points on both sides...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Pro will be arguing in favor of abolishing the veto power of the permanent members of the UNSC on UN Resolutions
Con will be arguing for upholding the status quo, maintaining the veto power of the UNSC permanent members on UN Resolutions
BoP is shared, Pro must prove the abolition of veto power for the UNSC's permanent members while Con must prove that the veto power of the UNSC's permanent members ought to be upheld.
I thank my friend Corey for this debate, this is his first and hopefully not his last. It's my hope that he will learn a lot and continue debating, let's begin! Pro can begin his arguments immediately
a good argument for automatic loss and completion from first forfeiture