According to the documentary "Science of sex appeal" which I don't know where someone can find a viewing of to see for themselves, it makes no room to give a consistent biological basis for homosexual attraction.
I had this topic in the past and many just filibustered with the excuse of not doing the research themselves on the documentary.
The documentary comprehensively explains hormones between the opposite sexes. It explains a biological scent that attracts one sex to the other that is apparently detected under radar. It is not a scent that is a full blown regular aroma likened to roses or anything strong. It's a scent that is there to trigger a signal causing movement in pursuit of physical contact but it is by no means a conspicuous sense.
Aside from this, the documentary breaks down the attractions of bodily parts. The male is attracted to the female breasts. This is because the female breasts serve a function of offspring nourishment. Get this. The larger the mammary glands, the more attractive. I had a debate topic on this regarding the voluptuous size of a female affects the attraction of a male.
This is why a male experiences arousal to a genital erection when contacting the mammary glands.
Just as a side note, during sexual activity, the female receives reward from nipple stimulation and is interconnected with sexual arousal.
How does this link back to offspring?
Nipple stimulation can also help increase your breast milk. This is especially helpful if you are having trouble with the “let-down reflex,” which releases the milk into your nipple. By stimulating the nipples, you are signaling to your body to release prolactin and produce more milk.
The male is attracted to facilitate all of this by just at the start of the physical appearance.
It's not just in superficial terms the male is attracted to the female because the female just simply looks good. That's circular. The appearance of a bodily feature has its structure based on a function. It is that deep rooted function that biologically is channeling a sex to another. It may be unbeknownst to us why at a certain age we develop physical interest. It's almost like subliminal or subconscious. But there's actually a biological science behind all of this. The science of sex appeal or interest .
It's physical appearance to ultimately at an end of some sort of functionality.
The male is wired to accomplish this functionality by physical signals.
This is also true with the physical appearance the male is compelled to of the other anatomical features such as female buttocks, thighs, etc. The few areas where excess fat or tissue is gathered. The male is attracted to all this and experiences arousal to erection due to this indicating that the female is built to store excess nutrients for the offspring she carries.
Next up is still in relation to the buttocks. The attraction to the buttocks stems from the outline of the arch of the back. Along with that comes the attraction to the bodily feature of the wideness of the hips. Yes those "child bearing" hips.
All of these elements trigger arousal in the rise to penile erection. The link is more and more consistent. The male is being triggered by prenatal reproductive elements to then himself transmit reproductive material to .
Where does homosexuality fit into all this?
Perhaps the opposing side can enlighten us with more research. I believe they have said before in so many words that research and education is not really their thing. I believe they said they reject truth. When you research and learn the truth that doesn't favor what you prefer, what are you going to do but reject or dismiss it?
How does homosexuality connect in all this?
We can see why the male penile erection would occur based on the explanation between male and female.
It has to erect in order to eject or ejaculate sexual reproductive material .
Take a homosexual male. Why would this male experience an erection in attraction to ultimately to eject reproductive material with another male whom does not have prenatal reproductive elements to receive transmission?
Let's think of it. The homosexual male is triggered by another individual who does not possess these elements to transmit their material to.
Why does the physique of a male arouse another male to erection to ultimately ejaculate seed in which that male they're attracted to cannot be planted with?
We understand with the help of the documentary to explain why a female will have physical attraction to the male physique.
Going back to the documentary, they point out the musculature of a male is of sex appeal to the female. Just as the female's shape is giving indication for physical qualification of motherhood, it is likewise with the male.
The physique of the male , the musculature signals the amount of strength and protection provided by the male over the female's offspring. The female anatomy can provide only but so much protection.
Both the male and female physical bodies tell about their health which is also a crucial qualifier in attraction of pretty much establishing the parental process. That's pretty much what this is.
Like food that has a biological metabolic function, not just solely recreation or one or the other but sexual engagement has its biological function and process.
The physique of a male helps identify his standing in health including the quality of his genes. This is consistent because as you guessed it, these genes will be passed on in consummation.
You have the musculature, jaw line, the broadness of shoulders, the chest to waist ratio. All of the secondary sexual traits aside from the obvious private ones. All of these traits indicate masculinity and the level of testosterone which is key in fertility.
So in summary there is really not much to explain how homosexuality makes sense from this documentary. Maybe the opposing side can present counter material.
