Instigator / Pro
2
1500
rating
4
debates
62.5%
won
Topic
#5058

Aid to Israel shouldn’t occur until there is a ceasefire

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Winner
2
0

After 2 votes and with 2 points ahead, the winner is...

Garrettwest38
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
Three days
Max argument characters
800
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
0
1500
rating
10
debates
30.0%
won
Description

No information

Round 1
Pro
#1
Forfeited
Con
#2
I can see that t his argument is no longer necessary.
Round 2
Pro
#3
Forfeited
Con
#4
Forward.
Round 3
Pro
#5
The rules of proportionality have been blown out of the water. A people who themselves have been starved and dehumanized in camps, have!isolated nearly two million people suffer a similar fate as them. two things can be happening at the same time: Israel can both be a key ally and also be in the midst of what appears to be a genocidal campaign targeted indiscriminately against an entire populace. This type of war, since half of the people they are degrading are children, promises to simply cement a new hatred for Israel and the promise of new factions of militants against Israel from these people and providing Hamas a win, for a never ending war with these two groups of people: Diplomacy mixed with targeted killings would be an actual plan for Israel to be safe moving forward.
Con
#6
I thought that you are no longer considering  this argument necessary.. but your argument is flawed due to all of it being based on "A people who themselves have been starved and dehumanized in camps"  because this sentence is incorrectly written and incorrectly explained of the people which is why it is flawed, henceforth your argument is based on a flawed explanation of the people. 

Correct me if I'm wrong, but this is an argument that I can provide, but it is not the only argument I can provide, unfortunately due to my observation of why you forfeited multiple rounds is that you wished to( expressively) "annihilate" me in the last round with a flawed grammatical sentence (the logic is also flawed due to the flawed grammatical sentence), hence you failed in a way. 


Also, you made us both not have enough rounds to argue with each specified argument.