Would homosexuality be accepted by society if the majority 98% of earth population were practicing homosexuals?
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After not so many votes...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Rated
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
- Minimal rating
- None
Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.
Straightforward question that I don't see asked and answered. Couldn't even find discussions online regarding this topic.
If you say yes, to the question, tell us why please. We'll be the first at the table discussion.
: regarded favorably : given approval or acceptancea fully accepted member of the groupespecially : generally approved or used
- If 98% of the society accepts homosexuality, it would be enough to be accepted by definition.
- In this case, 98% of the society do accept homosexuality.
- Therefore, such a hypothetical society would accept homosexuality.
Let me ask you this being that you choose to measure society by 98% , would society still accept homosexual practice being that they're 2 percent that are the remaining surviving heterosexuals left to survive the population, the 2 percent now?
Would society accept using electricity if only 98% of the world population gets electricity?
Would society accept using phones if 98% of the people use them?
Would vaccination be normalized if 98% of the people are vaccinated?
If you say "yes" , that is where it is only valid in attempt to make a rebuttal within the goalpost of this topic.
I rest my case for what is projected to be a waste of time.
"Would society accept using electricity if only 98% of the world population gets electricity?
Would society accept using phones if 98% of the people use them?
Would vaccination be normalized if 98% of the people are vaccinated?
What is a society? A people is it not? If 2 percent aren't people, what are they?
Very simple without trying to complicate things in order to try and avoid refutation, just face it. In the case of this topic, 98 percent of society or just about all, not all, but very close that they're practicing homosexuals and the remaining percentage which is the minority are not ok. Would that minority, the heterosexual members still accept homosexuality based on the views they currently have now in real time?\\
Are you asking about something realistic? If so are you asking this because you have no answer for this scenario presented in this topic?
"Let me ask you this being that you choose to measure society by 98% , would society still accept homosexual practice being that they're 2 percent that are the remaining surviving heterosexuals left to survive the population, the 2 percent now?"
I asked you is 2% of society still society. You act like the 2 % aren't people. Then I ask what are they if they're not people. You couldn't answer. You're stuck. You stand refuted.
What counts as "the people"?A majority. Some may propose 2/3rds majority, but 98% is above that as well.: regarded favorably : given approval or acceptancea fully accepted member of the groupespecially : generally approved or used
This entirely depends on definition of "society".