The Rise of AI
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 4 votes and with 9 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- Six months
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
In the debate I will argue for the net positive effect of AI rising into efficacy and popularity.
The contender will argue for a net negative of AI rising.
Free debate, any argument is acceptable as long as you argue for your side.
Despite Pro's forfeiture, Con didn't rebut any of Pro's claims or justify their statement that AI will enslave humanity.
Even though PRO forfeited 2 rounds, CON didn’t capitalize and failed to present anything in rebuttal
Even though PRO forfeited the arguments were still better and at the end of the day that's what it's about. Whomever can present the best most cohesive arguments that are still standing at the end of the debate. CON was unable to actually rebut which leads to a vote for the PRO
Even with Pro's forfeitures, Con never took advantage of Pros absence to put forth a well structured argument. Both sides offered a pretty simple case with little substantiation, but Pro's case was clearly better thought out. From Pro's arguments, I can glean that humans will be able to outsource many tasks to AI, thereby allowing humans to specialize in creative endeavours. Con's response about the loss of human braincells and the threat of an AI takeover have no logical reasoning or evidence to back them up. Moreover, Pros response to these critiques, that humans have a long history of killing each other, is good enough to debunk Con's idea that greater AI control will lead to more death and suffering.
Well, yes, AI is good.