Instigator / Pro

MrPotato

1492

rating

debates

0.0%

won

Topic

#4847

IQ does not determine intelligence

Status

Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics

Better arguments

Better sources

Better legibility

Better conduct

After 4 votes and with 21 points ahead, the winner is...

Average_Person

Parameters

Publication date: 08.15.2023 04:55PM
Last updated date: 08.22.2023 05:25PM
Type: Standard
Number of rounds: 1
Time for argument: One day
Max argument characters: 10,000
Voting period: One week
Point system: Multiple criterions
Voting system: Open

Contender / Con

Average_Person

1516

rating

debates

82.0%

won

Description

No information

Round 1

MrPotato

08.15.2023 05:11PM

Pro

My iq is 300. im dum tho

Average_Person

08.15.2023 05:25PM

Con

IQ literally stands for Intelligence quotient, it has intelligence in it.

They also measure how badly you want to succeed in life. Mentality is essentially intelligence (https://www.science.org/content/article/what-does-iq-really-measure)

If your iq were really 300 then you won't be posting dumb args and actually do smth.

prefix

08.21.2023 04:32PM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

Pro gave no argument, and no sources
Con at least had some point made and some source used.
Pro's conduct was poor in that Pro did not engage the issue.

Barney

08.18.2023 04:35PM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

Technically it doesn’t, since it’s intelligence which determines the measurable IQ…

But pro had a single sentence assertion against a properly warranted case. So foregone conclusion.

RationalMadman

08.18.2023 06:40AM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

interesting

Best.Korea

08.16.2023 09:07PM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

Eh, what? Well, Pro says that he has IQ of 300. Then says he is dumb.
Con challenges the claim by saying that someone with 300 IQ wouldnt make dumb arguments.
Con provides a source. Since Pro didnt provide source, sources go to Con. With burden of proof on Pro and Pro's arguments negated, Con wins the arguments.