Instigator / Pro
1
1702
rating
574
debates
67.86%
won
Topic
#4841

Any Muslim that consensually has been, is or will be in Professional Boxing and UFC (if involving striking arts) was/is/will-be a sinner that violates Islam. [Kritiks banned]

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Winner
1
0

After 1 vote and with 1 point ahead, the winner is...

RationalMadman
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
One week
Max argument characters
24,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
0
1500
rating
1
debates
0.0%
won
Description

I have to do it unrated as mods are not protecting me from votebombing abuse and it's entirely exploitable.

For this debate, the real 'Islam' is defined as that deriving from the Qur'an, Hadiths and through early Islamic practises. The Sunnah itself is disregarded by both sides as I am not whatsoever only representing Sunni Islam.

I firmly believe that Muhammad Ali, Khabib Nurmagomedov and Mike Tyson as well as Andrew Tate and many others who engage in aggressive (as opposed to solely defensive) martial arts for entertainment are violating Islam and cannot claim to be genuine practising Muslims regardless of whatever other sins they do or don't do.

To strike upon the face and head is Haram and to be violent for entertainment purposes is also Haram. I wish to prove this in multiple ways. Do not expect an easy debate.

Troll Kritik angles like 'Islam is fictional and so you can't really sin in real life for a fantasy' and such are banned. No Kritiks allowed, genuine discussion of if it is possible that these guys aren't sinning in Islam while claiming to be Muslim is the focus.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:

Full forfeit by Con