The US does not stand for freedom and democracy
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 3 votes and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- One day
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
The US has long said that it’s the leader of the free world, this has been accepted without question by many who believe in US exceptionalism and is topic that needs to be discussed
Not much of a debate. I'm afraid I have to disagree with the claim of the topic and the Pro personally. But the fact is that They at least made an argument. Con forfeited the first round, only provided half of a dispute, and refused to participate further. Pro gets my vote by default since Con did not do much to counter their points.
Con mentions that the US is a democracy, which Pro concedes. However, Con's case doesn't talk much about freedom or show how the US stands for either—being a democracy and standing for democracy are technically different things, unless Con makes an argument for how one should necessarily constitute the other. Pro's framework is more developed, and they argue that while the US is meant to be a democracy, it acts undemocratically and against the interests of freedom in a number of ways. Even if the democracy point is largely a semantic dispute, the resolution is affirmed if the US does not stand for freedom, because then it would not be standing for both freedom and democracy. Pro goes into a lot of detail on foreign policy here, which Con fails to negate. Even if the US does stand for freedom and democracy in some ways, I'm interpreting this resolution as referring to how the US acts most of the time (I think that's the most reasonable reading), unless Con makes an argument for why the resolution should be interpreted differently.
Con chose the route of cherry picking out of context, while wholly dropping the related contentions. This leaves the USA as not the leader of the free world (apparently 30th place or something).
As for there being some democratic ability within the USA, pro was able to show why it ended up being anti-democratic via going with the opposite result in elections. Again, this was not challenged (and trust me, there’s some easy counters to this).
👍, thanks for voting too man, much appreciated
Sounds good. Just DM me when you want to, and I will set up the debate. The topic will remain the same.
I’m on holiday rn in bali for 10 more days, so I probably won’t do any debates until I’m back home, but after that I’d be up for one because this one wasn’t particularly interesting in its substance lol. If you want you can set out the rules and voting for it because I’m new to this and I’m not sure what’s the best rules and stuff for this. Thanks tho
If you're willing, I would be more than happy to debate with you on this topic since the Con did not do much. I would be a con on this debate.
Thanks for that one mate👍
Yes, because the "US" stands for United States (of America), not "Freedom and Democracy". That would be FD, or maybe even FDR, but that's debatable.