Instigator / Pro
2
1524
rating
54
debates
74.07%
won
Topic
#4654

Prophet (SAW) from Islamic Religion was a Pedophile.

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Winner
2
2

After 2 votes and with the same amount of points on both sides...

It's a tie!
Judges
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
574 debates / 861 votes
Voted
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
363 debates / 86 votes
Voted
Sir.Lancelot's avatar
Sir.Lancelot
182 debates / 79 votes
No vote
DavidAZ's avatar
DavidAZ
8 debates / 34 votes
No vote
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
Two weeks
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
Six months
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Judges
Contender / Con
2
1500
rating
3
debates
33.33%
won
Description

Resolution: Prophet (SAW) from Islamic Religion was a Pedophile.

Pro: Prophet (SAW) from Islamic Religion was a Pedophile

Con: Prophet (SAW) from Islamic Religion was not a Pedophile.

Willing to change definitions if asked. Otherwise, these are the current set definitions.

Pedophile: a person who is sexually attracted to children.
https://languages.oup.com/google-dictionary-en/

Child groomer: Grooming is when someone builds a relationship, trust and emotional connection with a child or young person so they can manipulate, exploit and abuse them.
https://www.nspcc.org.uk/what-is-child-abuse/types-of-abuse/grooming/

Child: A child is a human being who is not yet an adult.
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/child

Adult: An adult is a mature, fully developed person.
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/adult

Any other definitions should be stated in the beginning of round one (unless introduced later on), other than that, any other words should be used in there primary context.

--

Rules:
1. Burden of proof is shared.

-->
@Mr.BrotherD.Thomas

You have probably said those same things 500 times by now. I have never seen anyone repeat the same for so many times and not get bored.

-->
@Best.Korea

Best.Korea, Dudette,

Learn this very simple proposition, Jesus' true words within the scriptures DOES NOT ALLOW ME TO CALM DOWN in any way whatsoever, especially in Bible Slapping Silly the goat-herder tigerlord, understood?

“Preach the word; be ready in season and out of season; REPROVE, REBUKE AND EXHORT, with complete patience and teaching.” (2 Timothy 4:2)

You're excused.

.

-->
@Mr.BrotherD.Thomas

Dude... calm down lol

-->
@whiteflame
@tigerlord

Papertiger,

When you think it is okay for a 9 year old girl to marry a sweaty camel-humper Muslim man that is 3 to 4 times her age, then you NEVER answered the question whether you would allow your beloved daughter to marry at this age, as in your minds eye, seeing a huge camel stinking Muslim man crawling on top of your little 9 year old daughter in painfully SCREWING her little girl vagina, mouth, and ass to no end!!!!

Would you let YOUR DAUGHTER to become a SEX TOY for a stinking sweaty Muslim man as described above? YES OR NO you hypocrite goat herder if you say NO in relation to your argument in this debate!

.

-->
@whiteflame

Ok dude.

-->
@tigerlord

We don't have control over site coding, dude. But here's a fix I've been using: copy-paste your argument into a Google Doc before copy-pasting it into here. I've found that that doesn't encounter the same problem.

-->
@Barney
@whiteflame

When you gonna fix the space deleting bug from this website? Its huge headache.
I am going to post my argument without editing in DA and post it with mistake because this is so much frustrating.

-->
@tigerlord

Debating? I'm not debating with you. You asked for informative reasoning, I gave it.

I did not play dirty. No matter what I said would it have changed that we agreed to a mutual tie.
I wrote that in this debate, because you seem to be gloating and surrounding the fact "yeah, give up this debate because you would've lost with only one voter".

You took it into terms of being a bias voter, and if I wouldn't have agreed, it's sad you'd need a specific voter in order to win.

Addressing being online - I didn't participate, I simply get emails regarding DebateArt and I check out my notifications every once and awhile.
It said I was forfeiting rounds, and I was quite sure I finished all my debates. I checked it out, then I happened to see your "arguments" and decided to comment on it.

That's it, I'm done. I don't care what is in your next "argument". I want to leave it here, and that's what you wanted as well.

-->
@Bella3sp

So this is how you debate? Lol I am laughing. Becoming sentimental does not prove you are right. Also whatever you utter does bot make automatically correct. And lie is a big thing to do. You have been online during whole time and about my comment you have read it before you agreeing for mutual tie. I can feel you. Being desperate, you tried your hard to prove your case but all in vain. I still have one round. When I said about voter situation, you read it and then agreed for mutual tie. I do not know that time you were sleepy. And next time when you read again and found it ockward. But I cannot understand what is wrong with you. This was not some rap battle or anime debate
You have not rebutted even my 1 argument. And there are fallicius arguments from you with personal constrained framework within your brains capabilities. And setting your own rules and idea and confining me within it to frame me. But all in vain. And now in last round you tried to play dirty but all in vain coz I still have 1 last round. Cheers. Your personal opinion does not matter at all. I will rebut your last round normally it's against debates but you did it first. After first round you kept ignoring my arguments and doing something one sided. Really disappointing. You are not only bad voter but debater as well. Wasted my valuable time. Very bad kido

-->
@Bella3sp

as all voter gone only 1 left so the result could be not in your favor. about voting we can decide later. like let be without voting. but for academic and informative purpose we should complete the debate in casual way and leave the debate without voting. what you say about it?

-->
@Barney

Paper tiger,

YOUR DUMBASS QUOTE THAT WILL ONLY FURTHER YOUR EMBARRASSMENT ABOUT ISLAM: "Thomas, keep activating my debates. The more active they are the more people will read them. Which is good, because more people will know the truth."

YES, in keeping with activating your sickening debate about you DEFENDING your illiterate Muhammed in being an outright PEDOPHILE in his time period because he married a little innocent girl Aisha WHEN SHE WAS ONLY SIX YEARS OLD, and then started SCREWING HER when she was NINE YEARS OLD, will tell the people the TRUTH in how deplorable the beginnings of your Satanic faith of Islam truly is! Thank you!

MUHAMMED LIKED FONDLING LITTLE GIRLS!!!
Narrated Jabir bin Abdullah: “While we were returning from a Ghazwa (Holy Battle) with the Prophet, I started driving my camel fast, as it was a lazy camel A rider came behind me and pricked my camel with a spear he had with him, and then my camel started running as fast as the best camel you may see. Behold! The rider was the Prophet himself. He said, 'What makes you in such a hurry?" I replied, I am newly married " He said, "Did you marry a virgin or a matron? I replied, "A matron." He said, "WHY DIDN'T YOU MARRY A YOUNG GIRL SO THAT YOU MAY PLAY WITH HER AND SHE WITH YOU? When we were about to enter (Medina), the Prophet said, "Wait so that you may enter (Medina) at night so that the lady of unkempt hair may comb her hair and the one whose husband has been absent may shave her pubic region.”  (Sahih Bukhari 7:62:16)

Papertiger, you do not have the sense to feel embarrassed over your deplorable Islamic faith!

.

-->
@tigerlord

My bad, i've been more inactive on this website.

If you want.

Thomas, keep activating my debates. The more active they are the more people will read them. Which is good, because more people will know the truth.

Well, let's complete this debate. I will see for others later

.
Papertiger,

YOUR RUNAWAY WHINING QUOTE FROM NOT BEING ABLE TO DEFEND THE DEFENSELESS: “I really lost the interest to debate anymore on this website. after watching the condition of voting, it's really upsetting.”

Nobody with at least half a brain can defend the FACT that your desert sweaty imbecile Muhammed, that couldn’t even read or write the language of Arabic, was an outright PEDOPHILE in his day when he married Aisha when she was only SIX YEARS OLD! Then “allegedly” consummated the marriage when she was only 9 years old where he could then SCREW her little innocent child body!

You said many times that you were leaving this prestigious Religion forum, but yet you are still here making a fool of yourself in “trying” to defend a pervert PEDOPHILE named Muhammed!

As in your statement above, do all of us a favor and just LEAVE THIS TIME to save yourself any further embarrassment because in the last debate, YOU LOST, and in this debate, logic will say you will lose this one as well!

.

-->
@Best.Korea

indeed david seems to be gone as well. troll debater and voter ruining the good vibe of this website. so it would be only you who would be voting for this debate. lets see what bella would say.

-->
@tigerlord

If you both agree to a tie, then my vote will be tie and debate will be tie. With other voters gone, its not a big deal to end the debate at this point. I would hate to be the only one deciding the winner, to be honest. I am not sure if David will come online. He might.

-->
@Bella3sp

I really lost the interest to debate anymore on this website. after watching the condition of voting, its really upsetting. that is why i did not want to debate with you at first place.
is there any possibility to conclude this debate from both side?
I mean both agree to tie it out.

-->
@tigerlord

It's rushed.

But yes, I did include your link.

-->
@Bella3sp

can u post my debate's link in next round which i intended to post.

-->
@RationalMadman

Not sure why you decided to respond late, but alright.
It's whatever. I don't really want to drag this out.

I'll appreciate it if you do vote, if not, that's fine.

-->
@Bella3sp

I know he did, that is why I said wasn't you, and said 'anyway'.

-->
@tigerlord

Sadly the content of debate rounds can not be edited.

You can ask your opponent to share your link in their argument, and/or provide it at the start of your next round. Most judges don’t have a problem with this type of typo correction.

-->
@Bella3sp

ok all good.
i will check after 3 days, i could not find time and my hardware broke many times while preparing argument and also some other stuff i was busy with, otherwise it would have been very good argument, better next time.

-->
@Barney
@whiteflame

I accidentally posted wrong link in my argument. If someone can edit it, it would be very nice thanks.
i will be off for 3 days to do physical preaching journey so i will check later what will be solution for it.
thanks
https://www.debateart.com/debates/4533-islam-vs-anything2
this is link i indented to use in my argument but i posted 1.

-->
@tigerlord

All good. I'm going to ignore your link and everything mentioned with it anyways.
(Expect for small comments of course but it's not of importance).

^ Also, I don't think mod's can change your argument regardless of mistakes.

-->
@Bella3sp

i accidentally posted wrong link its not 1 but 2
https://www.debateart.com/debates/4533-islam-vs-anything2

Maybe his internet went out

i will try to wrap up it soon.

-->
@RationalMadman

tigerlord requested you, actually. I just acted as the "messenger". I picked no judges, expect for DavidAZ as a change for Slaint.

My bad if it came off as a rude attitude or something like that, but it feels like its a bother to you (past two comments by you).
So, my response is, that's fine. And if it is, no problem, you don't have to vote. Or you could've declined at the start, no worries.

-->
@Bella3sp

Wasn't you who requested me anyway, what a shitty attitude.

-->
@RationalMadman

Feel free to not vote, and let all other three judges (or other judges) vote. That's fine.

This is going to take forever...

-->
@Bella3sp

When people behave like that, i can do nothing but facepalm. keep in mind, you were desperate to do this debate. instead of correcting your mistake by voting in previous debate, you started another debate and just doing same shi8t what i have already dealt.
you need to focus before doing anything, otherwise its all bull shi8t wasting time of others. When you had to do this, why wanted to debate with me? I was wondering, what a new debate has to do for poor vote? what you were trying to do there?
your RFD was blunder and here i saw your argument is same copy paste from previous debate. I assume you were going to elaborate and explain what a adult is, also support your claim to give warrant.
any ways I got opportunity to explain more and go in more depth of this topic. I assume that, you gonna give more in up coming rounds.

-->
@tigerlord

I'm tired, it wasn't an exception to add anything new, this is a different debate. Being this is a different debate means i'm not factoring in another debate. Different debate, different responding.

What you feel answers all of what I said in depth and disregards it, sure. By all means, copy and paste for all I care.

Yes, it took thirteen days. You asked for two weeks, you received. I believe you think my life outside of this website is less important?

So thank you, for taking the time to respond and reminding me I do not give a shit if you're disappointed. Thanks!

-->
@Bella3sp

what is new in this round? have i not done already whatever you have posted? I have to repeat full story again? Tbh i have to post my previous debate in resource and do not type anything that would be enough.
It shows you did not read my previous debate at all or with concentration.
I never leave any question for a honest person. Because I analyze everything critically and consider everything which a person can ask. In other words I take every thing head on without fear and as i believe Islam is truth so I always get answers.
any ways i will respond. after taking all 13 days still got this. I am very disappointed.

-->
@Barney

For me its not very hard to convince they follow polytheism or hybrid god.

Trying to explain pedophilia to Muslims, is like trying to explain polytheism to Christians.
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/phoebe-teaching-joey

-->
@Best.Korea

I already had that idea in mind. Last debate with Sir.Lancelot and tigerlord it was not discussed what an adult was, who is classified as an adult, etc. Which let a lot of open room with the question, Is Aisha an adult?

I plan to clarify it, hence my definition.

I would prefer if both sides make a clear case about what is an adult, and how they determine who is an adult.

Who is ready for 300,000 characters discussing what puberty means and if Muhammad PBUH was actually a hebephile rather than pedophile?

*buckles up*

-->
@Bella3sp
@tigerlord

I accepted as a judge. Thanks!

-->
@Bella3sp

Throw your full fledge opening argument. When the judges decide.

-->
@Bella3sp

Any other words should be used in their primary context.
I think it's not a good idea to do.
primary or secondary does not matter as far as there is context, then it's relevant.

-->
@tigerlord

Slainte no longer wanted to judge, so, I swapped his place.
If anything needs to be changed, let me know.