"Christianity is an extension of Judaism in the same way a sequel is to an original. "
Still two separate arts. This is why many complain about sequels. They wanted the original instead of getting a totally different idea.
"It’s not as simple as a difference in geography."
If you tell a Judaist they're the same as a Christian , it's disrespect to their position. The two are not interchangeable. If they were, then you can argue contradictions as they both would be the same or supposed to be the same.
One can't branch from another because they're not on the same tree . An oak and pine tree are two different trees. They don't conflict as they can exist at the same time separately. What grows on a pine tree is not on the other, that would contradict.
"How is this not a direct contradiction of the storyline preceding it? "
In regards to the films, they're two separate films. If this all happened in the same film and you were told as the audience this is the same character and even the credits use only one name of the two persons, you know you got a contradiction. Same space, same time, it it's not possible in the very same film. You can't have two different people actually be the same person. See I'm going beyond what's in a story. I'm also dealing with things realistically.
Just like in some films, the sequels do have a different actor or actress from another that played the character in the original piece or in one of the installments.
Did the character change or was it re-casting?
According to your example, "The Chosen One" is still "The Chosen One". The character didn't change, just the casting.
It depends on how finicky you'd depict to be a conflicting character.
If you are a true watcher of motion pictures, you should know that installments are an opportunity for stories to be rewritten creations to explain changes in a character or the plot . All sorts of creative ways to reinvent, add something, take something out . The point is, by doing all this, the film itself is becoming more and more different in a class of it's own. Not in the same class where they're antithetical issues.
This is how what they call remakes, rehashes,reboots and re-imaginings come about.
I also want to make this clear. Judaism is not the first religion in terms of beliefs and then the beliefs of Christ was born subsequently.
The scriptures point out the prophets in the old testament already containing the beliefs of Christ before the title Christian was even called out.
Judaism just rejects a lot of this as they're of a different scope.
"Christians accept that Jews are God’s chosen people. This means their beliefs were God’s official rulings. "
According to Christians that hold consistency,only "Jews" that are God's chosen people are the same ones that are spiritual Jews which would be those calling themselves Christians as well. Now you have to make the distinction of those "Jews" versus what you have here in the topic "Judaism".
I stated the distinction. Christians that believe they're are chosen or saved will not believe those practicing Judaism are saved or chosen of God because in Judaism as it was stated, the new testament and Christ is denied. So those Christians are not going to believe God will choose a people that deny Christ through whom He would save them through or choose in Him to be adopted into the church.
"In Judaism, there was no Hell or Lake of Fire. That is a Christian concept. "
Right two different positions. If one Christian believes the whole bible, believes in hell while another Christian doesn't but believes in the whole bible as well, now we have a contradiction. Contradictions exist as non-sequiturs in the same space, at the same time, in the same position. In actuality, it cancels out. You'll never see Judaism and Christianity interchangeable because they're two separate directions. Just like what grows on the pine tree won't be on the oak tree.
Hey best,.Korea lets debate
Not sure what you mean. The debates are 1vs1.
Can u join more than 10 players
If time between debate was extended, Id join. But do whats good for you.
I think this could be a fun debate if it was about an adjective. Something a little subjective. like ethical, moral, honourable, virtuous, conscientious etc.
As Christians believe that Jesus is the son of god, and Jewish people do not believe the same, that is a contradiction, so I agree with Nyxefid and the topic is a truism, and not debatable.
Probably best to define "Judaism" and "Christianity" in the description. Are we including any group that calls themselves Jewish? Any group that calls themself Christian?
I think this would be better if you specified beliefs or values.
Beliefs would make this a truism. Values would be an actual debate.