There are only 2 genders

Gender is often defined as a social construct of norms, behaviors and roles that varies between societies and over time. Gender is often categorized as male, female or nonbinary. Gender identity is one's own internal sense of self and their gender, whether that is man, woman, neither or both.

Sex is usually categorized as female or male but there is variation in the biological attributes that comprise sex and how those attributes are expressed.

A social construct is a concept that exists not in objective reality, but as a result of human interaction.

Simply there are only two genders: male and female. Gender and sex are the same thing. Gender is not a "social construct" that makes no sense and that's not how it works. You can't identify as something you are not. If you were born male you cannot say you are a female, you were not born with a uterus and you are unable to give birth. 

Gender is often defined as a social construct of norms. Social construct as Con defined: Is a concept that exists NOT in objective reality, but as a result of human interaction.

Gender identity is one's own internal sense of self and their gender, whether that is man, woman, neither or both.

Sex is categorized as female or male

Gender is categorized as male or female

Con states: Such as identifying as someone who is transgender however, be assigned as (sex) male at birth. 

Con states: In other words, gender is a is an identity, aka your own perception of who you are. 

Con states: Cisgender is coresponding with your sex related to by birth however, that doesn't show that all other genders have to.

That said, as a gender is a social construct and if I wanted to identify as non-binary, can.

Now let me dig deeper into the following: "you were born with a uterus and you are unable to give birth". 

I think this is false. Why? Because some "females" were not born with a uterus and infertile. Some were actually born with both parts. 

Breaking down the definition of gender

Gender is often defined as a social construct of norms. Social construct as Con defined: Is a concept that exists NOT in objective reality, but as a result of human interaction.

Key words: Not in objective reality, meaning it's not real. Objective refers to the truth and factual data that is not influenced by personal beliefs or biases. Con states gender is something you choose to identify as. False. You cannot be born one way then decide you want to identify as something different. I ask that Con explain how human interactions equate to someone claiming to be a gender that they were not born as?

 Understand the Difference Between Objective and Subjective (languagetool.org)

Let's pay attention to the word both. Per the definition this asserts that some humans possibly have sex organs of both male and female, meaning they can both impregnate a woman and become impregnated by another man and give birth, which in turn means it's assumed that some humans are hermaphrodites. Some animals are hermaphrodites with the exception of birds and mammals (humans are mammals). There have been no cases of a human producing both male and female gametes, in other words able to give birth while at the same time impregnate another human. Hermaphroditism does not occur in humans. Proof that this gender definition defies logic as there is only male and female.

Proof that gender and sex are the same

Sex is categorized as female or male

Gender is categorized as male or female

Within Con's definition as stated, both definitions involve male and female as I took a short portion of both and presented it, which is important. Con states that the difference between the two is that gender is a social construct in which I debunked above when I broke down the definition of gender. As you can see, both gender and sex definitions coincide.

Sex: The male, female, or sometimes intersex division of a species, especially as differentiated with reference to the reproductive functions or physical characteristics such as genitals, XX and XY chromosomes, etc. 

Con states: Such as identifying as someone who is transgender however, be assigned as (sex) male at birth. 

No matter what, a male who was born a male will always be a male. 

Con states: In other words, gender is a is an identity, aka your own perception of who you are. 

Just because they perceive themselves that way doesn't make it reality. There are a such thing as false perceptions. 

Perception Is Not Reality | Psychology Today

Argument

(Running out of characters)

Pronouns

A lot of these things people have made up over the years to the point where it's out of hand, even when it comes to the pronouns Ze/hir/hirs, ze/zir/zirs. 

Ze/Hir and Ze/Zir Pronouns — Pronouns.org Resources on Personal Pronouns

That said, as a gender is a social construct and if I wanted to identify as non-binary, can.

Did you feel this way ever since you were born? Or are you saying you can never feel this way for a long time but if you want to up and change your mind and decide tomorrow that you want to identify as non-binary, you can do that? I agree with the former. 

Now let me dig deeper into the following: "you were born with a uterus and you are unable to give birth". 

I think this is false. Why? Because some "females" were not born with a uterus and infertile. Some were actually born with both parts. 

Let's be clear, I stated "you were not born with a uterus and you are unable to give birth." Con forgot to include the not. A simple misunderstanding. I wanted to clear that up to make sure Con's response to me was their legitimate response and not one based off of them thinking I said "you were born with a uterus" vs "you were not born with a uterus". I was saying a man is not born with a uterus and is unable to give birth which is a true statement. What you said was true too regarding women being infertile, as far as women being born without a uterus, it's a very rare case. About one in 5,000 but like I said there are only two genders. Con's response here does not disprove my argument.

Uterine Transplant Could Allow Women Born Without A Uterus to Carry Their Own Babies | University of Utah Health | University of Utah Health

• Something that has been "created" and "accepted". This equates to something being made up. It should be unacceptable. This defies science, if you were born a female you can't identify as a male. Con's definition in the previous round included "not in objective reality". Social construct is not reality. I already proved so in the previous round. Gender simply should mean male and female only, not social construct. 
  

This is irrevlent. See how it says gender? Not sex?

Hermaphrodites = Sex NOT gender.

That is sex not gender. To confirm, I would like to mention that nowhere in your resolution does it say I cannot include animals. Therefore, this really isn't helping your case in the slightest. But I won't be talking about aniamls, as ill explain later on.

1. You can include animals if you'd like, it's up to you. Never mind, I see Con won't be using animals. I'd say this is helping my case as I've proven that that there aren't any cases of hermaphroditism in humans but I also animals have two sexes, just like humans do. 
   
2. Proved in the previous round that humans cannot have both male and female sex organs in response to "Gender identity is one's own internal sense of self and their gender, whether that is man, woman, neither or both."
   

• Con stated: Gender is often defined as a social construct of norms, behaviors and roles that varies between societies and over time. Gender is often categorized as male, female or nonbinary. Gender identity is one's own internal sense of self and their gender, whether that is man, woman, neither or both.
  
• Con stated: Sex is usually categorized as female or male but there is variation in the biological attributes that comprise sex and how those attributes are expressed.
  

1. Gender is often categorized as male, female or nonbinary
   
2. Sex is usually categorized as female or male
   

Sex: The male, female, or sometimes intersex division of a species, especially as differentiated with reference to the reproductive functions or physical characteristics such as genitals, XX and XY chromosomes, etc. 

Is this you contesting my definition of sex? If so, clearify.

1. You can identify as for example, non-binary but be biologically female. Its how YOU identify yourself. Of course, you will always be biological female/male. ✔️
   
2. Okay, I agree with pro. A biological male who was born as biological male, will always be a biological male. But may not identify as a male, but still is biological male. ✔️
   

For example, as you stated, "hermaphrodites", referring all intersex people as that is considered offensive. Or, calling someone gay a *f word*.

Nobodys mocking anyone. If your taking offense by somebody who you don't even know, and its not affecting you, it seems like a "you problem". Transwoman are simply identifying as they feel, why should woman take that it personal? Its no offense and sure not any crime.

When you say "you", i'm using this in general terms.

Some people do feel this way at birth or up to as they remember. Some people don't feel this way for awhile or don't realize it themselves.

Yes, anyone can shift genders as they choose. Some do, some don't.

1. It's funny because, if you think that only gender and sex are realited to eachother. And this definition of yours includes "or sometimes intersex division", therefore i'm obligated to think there is at least three genders. Female, Male, and Intersex. (Even though false, i'm proving a point) 
   
2. As I mention above, you, yourself state "intersex".. which in your terms would mean its another gender.
   

I merely used the definition of gender provided by Con. No contradiction displayed. I disagree that social construct should be used in the gender definition. I used sex in the argument as sex and gender are the same thing. I ask that Con explain how human interactions equate to someone claiming to be a gender that they were not born as?

I'd say this is helping my case as I've proven that that there aren't any cases of hermaphroditism in humans but I also animals have two sexes, just like humans do. 

1. Proved in the previous round that humans cannot have both male and female sex organs in response to "Gender identity is one's own internal sense of self and their gender, whether that is man, woman, neither or both."
   

Proof that gender and sex are the same

I wasn't changing the definitions provided by Con, as I said I took the important parts of both definitions, shortened them up and proved how they are the same, so all I did was take a chunk out of them both.

• Con stated: Gender is often defined as a social construct of norms, behaviors and roles that varies between societies and over time. Gender is often categorized as male, female or nonbinary. Gender identity is one's own internal sense of self and their gender, whether that is man, woman, neither or both.
  
• Con stated: Sex is usually categorized as female or male but there is variation in the biological attributes that comprise sex and how those attributes are expressed.
  

1. Gender is often categorized as male, female or nonbinary
   
2. Sex is usually categorized as female or male
   

Both definitions include "categorized as male or female" this is proof that sex and gender are in fact the same. Gender is supposedly a so-called social construct which is a false reality. Again, you cannot identify as something you weren't born as. 

I wasn't contesting your definition as both of our definitions were correct and pretty much the same. I was just reinforcing the definition of sex providing a different one

Con is helping my argument and proving my point with those two statements above.

Hermaphrodite is a scientific/medical term, that's how I see it. I wasn't aware that it's considered offensive. Hermaphroditism doesn't occur in humans anyways so there goes that. 

It's definitely a lot of mockery going on, particularly with transwomen. They think of themselves as actual women and disrespect biological ones. I can see how biological women can get offended by it especially if they come in contact with these men with dresses and who wear makeup, hopefully they aren't rude because some can be as there's numerous of videos. This is one of them, proof that biological women are mocked:

The Trans Community Blatantly Disrespects Women By Calling Them “CIS”

I was actually asking you personally.

I could understand if someone felt that way ever since birth but if you never felt that way since birth and then you magically decide to identify something you aren't? That's like me, a fully grown male adult in my 20's decide to wake up tomorrow and I now identify as female. Are you really telling me that makes sense? No. Especially as an adult who has gone through puberty and has had time to figure out who they are and has fully developed into adulthood. 

I'll play devil's advocate for your case since your argument is gender and sex are different. Like I said last round I believe Intersex ties into sex.

Animals don't usually categorized as sexes.

That doesn't mean they are the same. 

"Humans eat"

"Animals eat"

Doesn't mean they are the same.

If you check your words, it says "usually" and "often", and if you use the full defintion there is a clear difference. This is why I wanted torefer back to the full defintion.

Hermaphrodite was long changed as intersex, hermaphroditism is an older term. 

Intersex does occur in humans.

Transwoman can be rude ✔️

Transwoman arent all rude, but some might be ❌

Do some transgender people mock "woman"? Yes, sure. But loads of transgender people don't.

Your link: Calls them Cisgender, alright, they make mistakes. I'm sure that *women and *men ✔️ make the same mistake and refer to them by the wrong gender, correct?

Animals definitely do categorize as sex. Their sex is male and female, that's how reproduction exists. No source is needed for this as it is a fact and common sense. This has been existing since the beginning of time. Example, there's a a male or female dog. There's a male or female cat. Some animals are hermaphrodites with the exception of humans. If animals don't categorize as sex, what do they categorize as then? Apparently not gender. No, Animals Do Not Have Genders - Nautilus

I'm not saying you said they classify as gender/would say they classify as gender in the next round. Just was knocking that idea out.

They are the same. Humans and animals do eat, you further helped my point. What's the difference between the two eating? There is none.

Usually/often is basically the same thing. Slight difference in meaning but are the same thing at the end of the day. How? Both are adverbs of frequency that show how frequently an action takes place.

The thing is makeup and dresses are feminine, that's usually for women. (Not enough characters) I personally don't have an issue with it I'm just speaking for women who have an issue with it all the while being mocked and disrespected. It's different if a man is wearing a dress and is respectful to women.

Men wearing makeup or dresses are fine, they can do what they want but don't mock actual biological women by calling them "cis woman" "birther" "chest feeder" "bleeder" all of which are disrespectful and dehumanizing. They are women and that's what makes them women, they aren't those names. It's ironic how trans women want to be women but call women those things. (Not enough characters)

See how you're putting quotation marks around woman and man? Biological and real women and men btw. Are you dismissing the fact they are men and women? Are you saying that I am not a man? What you did is fine though right but if I say "trans woman" "trans man" it's off with my head. 

Might be? No, they can be like you said prior.

Loads of them don't? When possibly loads of them do. Okay. "might be" and "loads of transgender people don't" I see you're handling them with kid gloves like they're innocent, which is fine it's your opinion and prerogative.

The difference is with trans women/trans people calling biological women/men "cis women/men" (that definitely has all the rights to have quotes around it)

is that they intentionally (not mistakenly) call them that which is a flat out lie because they aren't cis, they are simply women.

They do it to offend and denounce them actually being a woman while the trans women want to think of themselves as actual women when they are not. Most of them do this.

Now with bio men and women who refer to trans women as men, that's not a mistake, that's the truth. They are referring them as the right gender, not the wrong gender. They are men and were born that way which is an undeniable fact. Unfortunately, they see that as an issue when people call them by their gender and get offended by the truth due to them being delusional, respectfully. Like I said though not all of them are like that and not all women are rude nor bothered with trans women. As long as respect is shown on both ends. I just notice bio women minding their business and trans women doing the most, just saying. Then when bio women speak out and defend themselves, they are the bad guy. It's the hypocrisy.