Instigator / Pro
2
1421
rating
23
debates
30.43%
won
Topic
#4487
Prove your opponent needs to touch grass
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 4 votes and with 2 points ahead, the winner is...
Bella3sp
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 1
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Contender / Con
4
1524
rating
53
debates
75.47%
won
Description
This debate is a certified League of Legends moment
Round 1
1. Anime pfp
Upon looking the character up, he's (yeah its a dude, he just looks fruity as hell) from some anime with a weeb-ass name and is a member of the "pretty boy detective club." This is clear evidence that my opponent needs to unsub from crunchyroll and touch grass.
2. Leaving
From their account description:
Absence:This account after all my current debates are finished will be logged off for quite some time.
They know they need to touch grass, so they are leaving for some time since they, in particular, have been spending more time on DART than they can afford. It varies from person to person, but for them, they've clearly reached their limit.
This is similar to how Supadudz, who also had an anime pfp, needed to leave and touch grass.
3. Fuck you, that's why
Fuck you.
Yes, thank you "Dharmann" for making this,
Forum stats:
Forum statsTopics126Posts3,780Likes520Mentions2,195
My man must have been on here 24/7.
Sign up:
A member since November 10, 2018
C'mon now, talking about me leaving (temp) but you've been here for years?
Discord mod:
I have a feeling that you look like this:
One of those sweaty discord mods, y'know? Just maybe a little more on the tan side? Honestly, I wouldn't have shown a photo, but you don't even know what you look like yourself. You can't even get up to check, sitting in that "gamer chair".
Furry:
OR, are you a furry? The ones dressed up? You probably haven't touched grass in years, you need it. I don't need a link for this one, just look in the mirror.
Grass:
See this grass? No, not your computer. These photos, these photos right here. It's right outside, just go ahead and touch it.
Fuck you too:
Fuck you. Oh wait, would that be gay?
--
Quick comment:
Upon looking the character up, he's (yeah its a dude, he just looks fruity as hell) from some anime with a weeb-ass name and is a member of the "pretty boy detective club." This is clear evidence that my opponent needs to unsub from crunchyroll and touch grass.
Well, first off, i'm glad you know about the character in my pfp then me. I didn't even know that, LOL. I think you need to touch some grass..
And how do you know what crunchyroll is..? Are you a secret subscriber? I could not relate.
Point:
Touch some grass, kids (including you as well, discord mod and furry).
--
Well that's just me being ignorant of pop culture.
Hah, it's a person from a video game. Don't think i've mentioned anyone from a video game or anime, but good to know outside perspectives.
I kind of assumed from your profile picture
Now that I really look at the votes.. Should I be asking why you think I'm a weeb?
My bad, didn't see this until now. I will most likely be creating anything revolving around controversies with woman, controversial opinions about homosexuals and standardized testing.
What topics do you feel strongly about?
We can debate them as many times as you like (Unrated.). I can be Pro or Con on any of them.
Alternatively, I can debate them with someone else and you can vote on them.
I considered. However it would slightly be inefficient. Though it would help with their opinions, it doesn't completly help me ackknowledge about the opposing side. I would rather get into a debate already confident with the pros or cons about the opposing side. Further, it seems I only cover some issues rather than underlining the main or not quite known issues.
However, I'll consider a bit more and might try it out.
There’s actually a quicker and easier way, I believe.
If you wanted to be able to firmly debate topics you feel strongly about. I’d say choose 1-2 topics and create unrated debates, then debate them once or twice.
I was out of my league debating socialism-capitalism, but re-doing a few debates on the subject made me feel comfortable talking about them.
It's temporary.
I want to do more research on my stronger opinions and constructing. Such as standerized testing, I will come back fully acknowledged on the pros and cons and recreate the debate. Then, i'll focus more on those opinions and constructing the correct frameworks.
Are you leaving because you’re bored of DART or a separate reason?
As he turns off his gaming computer the projection of the indoor grass fades away.
I never said that it wasn't OK to have them lol. It just makes it funnier.
Bruh it’s a troll debate, there’s gonna be fallacies :P
The millionaire's kid with an indoor garden smiles and carefully puts sleep to his gaming PC.
I wasn't going to go through the statistics of "grass is..." or "touching is..", I didn't take this debate seriously in anyway. I wasn't going to provide defintions when this was a troll debate. I even showed a picture of grass LOL. That's my way of defining it. It was used in the context of "you don't know what grass looks like, so go ahead look at this picture and go outside and touch it".
If you're going far into the statistics, think about the entire thing revolving around touching grass. (Aka, it's translated to telling someone to go outside). This debate is giving "reasons" why someone needs to touch grass. Like being a discord moderator, you need to go outside, do something with your life, touch some grass. It's all the humor in it.
So, whatever you call my side of the debating is fine. I wasn't looking to impress with this.
Just realized that my stats look probably like Mharman's as well. Good thing that my dad just bought a pot of herbaceous plant so now I don't even need to go out to touch grass.
Ad hominem and a Tu Quoque. LMAO
Just to show you that proving such is an impossible feat. The best arguments involve bashing the other side, just like in the politics. Really a topic where no theoretical objective argument exists.
Lol