Instigator / Pro
14
1500
rating
3
debates
66.67%
won
Topic
#4483

Is evolution compatible with the bible?

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
6
0
Better sources
4
0
Better legibility
2
0
Better conduct
2
0

After 2 votes and with 14 points ahead, the winner is...

TheAcademicChristian
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
Three days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
0
1421
rating
23
debates
30.43%
won
Description

The debate is about is evolution compatible with the bible. I am someone who will take the pro position which states that it is compatible while the con will argue against. I hope to have a great discussion, and I hope that this debate finds value with someone. The main goal of this debate is to have values dialogue that individuals from different walks of life can enjoy.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

CON obviously FF

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Convincing arguments Pro,
Pro made arguments that were within reason,
Con made no arguments.

Sources,
Pro used sources for some claims,
Con didn't use sources.

Legibility,
Dhdhfjdbdh,
Even with a Google search, does not come up as anything commonly recognized as a word that I saw.

Conduct,
It's bad conduct to accept a debate, but not debate,
Even if Mharman realizes they 'ought not do this.

More details,
Numerology, seeing symbolism 'everywhere,
Seems a risky method of truth to me.
Not that cultures don't 'have symbolism throughout their history,
But to me the recorded 'historical reasons, are more important than doing math and switching of numbers years after.
I'm not aware of the connection between the number 7 and evolution.

Ah, there it is,
"church fathers often had different ideas about the creation account mentioned in the first chapter of Genesis"
- TheAcademicChristian R1
And goes on to mention Augustine as an example.

Well, I suppose time 'might be different for God,
Though TheAcademicChristian mentions the 'vastness of time, rather than perspective,
I mention perspective, as what 'is a day?
Different planets turn at different rates I assume,
Different sizes, different days,
Or with the moon, we only ever see it's one face (Though at night) But something could always face the sun.
Are 24 hours assumed 'before the Earth was created? (I ramble here)

Polytheism and Idol Worship,
What concerns me about this argument,
Is how much of the Bible and Christianity then, becomes symbolic?
Not that one 'can't be a symbolic Atheistic Christian,
Or that only 'some parts are symbolic,
Just the line of thought I go down with this argument.

De novo is a Latin term that means "anew," "from the beginning," or "afresh."
I suppose God 'could have done evolution outside of the Eden the Bible mentions,
Yet created Adam and Eve inside it, for some purpose,
Though Atheists would think it unlikely, it 'does sidestep the argument that evolution means the creation of Adam and Eve 'cannot be.
The debate being whether evolution is 'compatible with the Bible, not whether the Bible is true or false.