1500
rating
1
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#4447
The Ugandan president's decisions (to pass the laws that he passed) and criticisms of western culture and homosexuality were not correct
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 2 votes and with 10 points ahead, the winner is...
Mast3rDebater
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
1500
rating
2
debates
100.0%
won
Description
Was he right to do this because of his traditional culture, or is he bigoted in his treatment and utter rejection of homosexuality?
Round 1
Forfeited
It seems PRO has forfeited his first round so I will take the liberty to begin
Consensus
I. Limits of leadership
As a democratic nation, Yoweri Museveni was elected by the people to lead the country so we must understand that as the president, Museveni is entitled to pass whatever laws he deems for his nation and its people, regardless of the feeling and opinions third-parties have on the matter. In reality, despite their best efforts, political leaders cannot please everyone.
II. Cultural Ideologies
It's also important to acknowledge every culture have their own set of beliefs and values. We know that Uganda is a conservative country with a large religious populous. We also know religions' resentment towards homosexuality, since for the most part, it is seen as a sin and considered a threat to their traditions. Even if one was to say religion is not involved, you could argue that this resentment is also rooted from the traditional African cultures, in which they express family substance and importance of reproduction.
With these 2 points being said, Museveni and Uganda have the undisputed right to pass laws that coincide with their traditions without having the west obtruding their peripheral opinions on the matter. It's essential to respect any nation's right to carry out their rulings.
Since I wasn't even supposed to go first, I will conclude my argument here for the time being. I'll let PRO expand on the statement. I'm curious what PRO's argument and motive is as they're the one that started this debate. Good luck!
Round 2
Forfeited
Well it seems PRO has forgotten about this debate so I won't waste my time writing anymore.
Voters can vote accordingly.
Round 3
Forfeited
...
bump
I get what you are saying now, but I think it should be interpreted as factually correct. He probably called the west degenerate or something
I dont think that was the intent. Legally correct? owing Ugandan Law? Procedurally correct? right... is contextual not absolute.
Correct means accurate, true etc.
Can I understand what correct is? What context is it defined as?
Can you just give me 5 bullet points of his criticisms of western culture and the laws he passed so I can be on the same page as you?