Instigator / Pro
6
1500
rating
1
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#4417
feminismo radical
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 3 votes and with 15 points ahead, the winner is...
Novice_II
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 2
- Time for argument
- Two hours
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Contender / Con
21
1896
rating
100
debates
93.5%
won
Description
No information
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
Forfeiture.
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
Full forfeit by Pro, who never contests the burden of proof.
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
By the choice of one side to forfeit the entire debate, the other side who didnt forfeit at all becomes the winner.
I would really like to debate on this topic, but the language difference would be nauseating. Also, I do not know a lot about feminism and am here to learn, but I believe that feminism has blown out of the waters and is unneeded in today's society, as feminism is fighting against phantoms, or rather, ghosts of the past.
I think Pro is "Pro radical feminism" especially when I translate the decription.
Before any argument is made, can Pro please state his/her opinion on Radical Feminism, and what exactly it is that Con or Pro would be arguing for?