Instigator / Con

randomason

1500

rating

debates

0.0%

won

Topic

#4319

All furries are bad and i have yet to see a person prove otherwise

Status

Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics

Winner

After 1 vote and with 1 point ahead, the winner is...

Bella3sp

Parameters

Publication date: 03.24.2023 12:47AM
Last updated date: 04.14.2023 05:01PM
Type: Standard
Number of rounds: 3
Time for argument: One week
Max argument characters: 1,000
Voting period: One week
Point system: Winner selection
Voting system: Open

Contender / Pro

Bella3sp

1524

rating

debates

74.07%

won

Description

No information

Round 1

randomason

03.24.2023 03:38AM

Con

Wanna play with fire?

Reason #1 Sexual actions/pornography

"...survey at a furry convention in 2013 found that 96.3% of male furry respondents reported viewing furry pornography... ...estimated 50.9% of all furry art they view is pornographic..." "...17.1% of males reported that when they viewed pornography it was exclusively or near-exclusively furry pornography, and only about 5% reported that pornography was the top factor which got them into the fandom."

An anonymous survey conducted by the Furry Research C

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furry_fandom

There was also abuse solely related to the furry fandom.

"Investigators say the abuse began in 2009 when Parker began taking a 9-year-old boy to a Bucks County home where a group of men dressed up as animals and referred to themselves as "furries.""

"The boy told investigators that a man dressed up as a Red Fox who called himself "Lupine," would take him upstairs during the parties and sexually abuse him. The boy said the abuse occurred several times over a seven-year period. The boy identified "Lupine" as Kenneth Fenske.

Local"

https://rb.gy/qiklw4

Bella3sp

03.24.2023 04:35PM

Pro

DISCLAIMER: These are not my current opinions and I am currently playing devils advocate.

Thanks randomason,

Burden of Proof:

"All furries are bad and i have yet to see a person prove otherwise" is shared but mostly relies on pro.

Definitions:

Bad:

b
: UNFAVORABLE
make a bad impression

Observations & "Rebuttals":

Con seems to be confused, I'm pro, not them. Meaning all their arguments apply to my position, no rebuttals needed.

Argument 1:

With my definition of "bad", just thinking about all the furries in the world is unfavorable. I find all furries unfavorable.

I mean, look at these furries: https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo/furries.html?sortBy=relevant

Imagine a furry coming up to you and starting to bark...

'Lord' better help if I see one of these barking at me.

Argument 2:

Nobody has yet to prove me otherwise. Based on your arguments, i'm glad you agree with me!

https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo/furries.html?sortBy=relevant

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bad

Round 2

randomason

03.31.2023 04:35PM

Con

Forfeited

Bella3sp

03.31.2023 04:49PM

Pro

Extend.

Round 3

randomason

04.07.2023 04:49PM

Con

Forfeited

Bella3sp

04.07.2023 05:01PM

Pro

Extend & end.

"but by the choice of one side to miss at least 40% of the debate, the requirement ceases. And yes, this does apply to Choose Winner, which otherwise would not allow conduct to be the sole determinant)."

Bella3sp

04.13.2023 11:19PM

#12

Bump.

Best.Korea

03.24.2023 06:53PM

#11

Look at me mommy, I am a furry.

randomason

03.24.2023 03:41AM

#10

-->

@Bella3sp

@BennyEmerald

im against furries, but the options were confusing. sorry for inconvinence

Bella3sp

03.24.2023 01:39AM

-->

@BennyEmerald

Depends. I can refer to "I" as me.

Yes, the short description does target the opposite side however the set in stone position for them is con.

BennyEmerald

03.24.2023 01:33AM

"All furries are bad and i have yet to see a person prove otherwise" is what con posted. But they're posting as con, meaning their against the topic sentence. So why put "and I have yet to see a person prove otherwise"? That description targets the instigator, but the instigator is con meaning they disagree with the claim, so they're disagreeing with their own experiences?

Maybe they wanted to put pro and mixed it up, who knows.

Bella3sp

03.24.2023 01:13AM

You know what.. i'll just accept this and see how this goes.

randomason

03.24.2023 01:12AM

-->

@Bella3sp

all furries are zoophiles

Bella3sp

03.24.2023 01:10AM

-->