Capital Surveillance inhibits the progress of society.

• The freedom to think independently is interrupted by the algorithm limiting your searches to only categories centered around your previous traffic.
  
• The information you're exposed to is centered around your personal views, so it amplifies your beliefs rather than allowing you to hear contradictory views to provide pushback.
  
• Lack of reliable sources.
  

A third reason is that these methodologies are designed to keep us ignorant. The rhetoric of the pioneering surveillance capitalists, and just about everyone who has followed, has been a textbook of misdirection, euphemism, and obfuscation.

• The companies that utilize surveillance capitalism/capital surveillance are able to assume long-term control. 
  
• Hierarchal chain of command is permanent. 
  

• As an extension of my last two points, the power that these companies have and the control over information means they will inevitably use this ability to obscure competing startup tech companies.
  

One theme of misdirection has been to sell people on the idea that the new economic practices are an inevitable consequence of digital technology.

• Tech companies harvest all sorts of data about us from our devices and online activities, often without our consent.
  

-Personalized algorithms can help individuals quickly find information that is relevant to their interests, saving time and effort in searching for information.

-Users have the option to control the information they see by adjusting their privacy settings or using different search engines that prioritize privacy.

-Companies that engage in capital surveillance are required to be transparent about their practices, allowing individuals to make informed decisions about whether to participate or not.

- The claim that companies are deliberately trying to keep individuals ignorant is an unsubstantiated one. Companies may have other motivations, such as increasing customer satisfaction and revenue, rather than hindering societal progress.

-While a few companies may dominate the market, there is still competition among them. Competition can help prevent any one company from completely monopolizing the market and exerting undue control.

-Government regulators can help prevent anti-competitive practices and promote a level playing field in the market.

-Consumers have the power to choose which companies they interact with and support. If a company is engaging in unethical practices, consumers can choose to switch to a competitor.

-Technological innovation can disrupt dominant players and lead to the emergence of new players in the market.

-Consumer advocacy groups can raise awareness about the practices of dominant companies and help ensure that their actions align with the interests of consumers.

“-There are various privacy protections in place, such as laws like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union and the California Consumer Privacy Act, which give consumers control over their personal data and help ensure that companies are transparent about their data collection practices.

-While some users may be unaware of the extent of data collection, there is a growing awareness among consumers about the importance of privacy and the potential risks of unchecked data collection. This awareness is driving the development of privacy-focused products and services.

-Technological advancements are making it easier for consumers to protect their privacy. For example, privacy-focused browsers and ad blockers can help prevent companies from tracking user activity.

-The market is increasingly competitive and companies that prioritize privacy are likely to gain a competitive advantage over companies that do not.

-Governments around the world are considering new regulations to protect consumer privacy. For example, the US Congress is currently considering several privacy bills that would give consumers greater control over their personal data.”

“-While companies may attempt to influence user choices through their algorithms and personalized recommendations, ultimately the decision to make a purchase lies with the user. Consumers have the ability to research products and make informed decisions based on their own preferences and values.

-The market is competitive and companies that prioritize user choice and privacy are likely to gain a competitive advantage over companies that prioritize their own interests.

-Governments around the world are considering new regulations to protect consumer privacy and promote competition. For example, the European Union has implemented strict privacy regulations to ensure that companies do not abuse their power.”