Instigator / Pro
1
1500
rating
9
debates
38.89%
won
Topic
#4136

Women can't drive

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Winner
1
0

After 1 vote and with 1 point ahead, the winner is...

Decisively_Conservatist
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
1
Time for argument
Three days
Max argument characters
4,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
0
1587
rating
182
debates
55.77%
won
Description

No information

Round 1
Pro
#1
As I said, we only use absurd reasoning.

With this in mind, let's "define" our terms.

"Women" are beings that can't drive.

"To drive" Means to be in charge of a real world vehicle.

So, from this we can infer that those beings who can not drive, can't, by definition, drive.

This is because instead of driving, women ACTUALLY drive a simulated vehicle in a simulated reality called "The framework", however they don't know it and act as if they were indeed driving. 

This simulated reality is created by yet other simulated beings known only as "men", who use a simulated system of power named "patriarchy" to simulate authority on the simulated reality where women drive. So, we have a simulated reality, INSIDE  asimulated reality, controlled by the former simulated reality.
Con
#2
Definitions:
Can 1. Be able to.
Can't 1. Short for cannot. 2. Lack the ability.


It is fundamentally clear that women possess the ability to drive, but science has proven women to be lazier and less responsible than men, so they would intentionally get into accidents as a way to deter the law from allowing women to drive. By creating this narrative, they enable men to assume the full responsibility and burden of driving simply because they don't want to have to go through the effort of driving to their destination.