Instigator / Pro

Anomaly

1495

rating

debates

0.0%

won

Topic

#3997

A job is for money

Status

Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics

Better arguments

Better sources

Better legibility

Better conduct

After 4 votes and with 28 points ahead, the winner is...

RationalMadman

Tags

Economics

Parameters

Publication date: 12.24.2022 02:02AM
Last updated date: 01.11.2023 08:19PM
Type: Standard
Number of rounds: 2
Time for argument: Two days
Max argument characters: 10,000
Voting period: Two weeks
Point system: Multiple criterions
Voting system: Open

Contender / Con

RationalMadman

1702

rating

574

debates

67.86%

won

Description

I believe that a job is for money. If you disagree, you are welcome to debate with me.

Round 1

Anomaly

12.26.2022 02:03AM

Pro

Forfeited

RationalMadman

12.26.2022 07:56PM

Con

Blowjob (not from a prostitute or pornstar)

Volunteer job

Your 'job' on a team that itself does not gain you more money.

Round 2

Anomaly

12.28.2022 07:56PM

Pro

Forfeited

RationalMadman

12.28.2022 08:19PM

Con

ok let's get the votes

Intelligence_06

01.05.2023 01:39PM

To be fair, and I can't believe I am saying this, the quality(or a lack thereof) for this topic is at a degree where the interpretation of the INDEFINITE ARTICLE would ultimately decide the position of one.

RationalMadman

12.28.2022 08:19PM

-->

@Barney

ff pls vote ty

Best.Korea

12.26.2022 01:52PM

Job is for money... unless you are a Chinese volunteer.

Intelligence_06

12.24.2022 03:08AM

Tell that to Kamikaze pilots.

oromagi

01.11.2023 07:04PM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

full forfeit

Intelligence_06

01.05.2023 01:42PM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

All Pro has to do was to justify the interpretation that as long a profitable and sustainable specimen of a job(for example, a banker or a CEO) exists the topic is real, and give such example. Pro did nothing, which makes me(and perhaps more) disappointed slightly, yea.

Me giving personal arguments while not affecting the turnout of the voting distribution should amount to nothing, yeah, the debate itself is set in stone. Nobody can help Pro write his part, except maybe if I open this topic in the far future, where people forgets how fallacious their logic could be...yea.

zing_book

01.05.2023 01:29PM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

I do believe a job is for money, leading to economical values which means having a good life. Alternatively Con has stated other types of jobs such as volunteering ( which taking into consideration of the cruel human society would only do for personal gain, but I do believe there are good people out there). However Pro failed to argue back leading to forfeiture .

Barney

12.29.2022 04:51AM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

Con successfully showed that some jobs (specifically ones which suck) can be volunteer driven instead of for money.