Slavery is still legal here in the US. African Americans and the 13th Amendment proves it.
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 2 votes and with 6 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 2
- Time for argument
- Twelve hours
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
During the civil war they are approximately 1.5 million casualties reported. The emancipation proclamation was supposed to be the intention of abolishing slavery. The 13th Amendment was supposed to make it unconstitutional to have slaves or indentured slavery. However there is a exception in the 13th Amendment that null and voids the entire civil war and reconstruction of the South. I intend to prove that not only does the 13th Amendment negate abolishing slavery, but also kept slavery alive and well in this country. Which also means that reparations are still owed to the African-American community for not just leading up to the civil war, but for 404 years of slavery and the clock is still ticking.
- U.S code 1589 Forced Labor.
During the Middle Ages, slavery continued to exist in Europe, and it also spread to the Americas with the arrival of European colonizers. In the Americas, slaves were used primarily for agricultural labor, and they were an essential part of the economy in many parts of the Americas.
In 1871 the Virginia Supreme Court ruled that prisoners were a "slave of the state"
Another term used for involuntary servitude is also known as human trafficking
As you can see, this law clearly forbids forced Labor without an exception.
The 13th Amendment allows an exception for something that is already considered a crime
By including this exception, the 13th Amendment sought to prohibit slavery and involuntary servitude, while also recognizing the longstanding practice of requiring individuals who had been convicted of crimes to perform labor as part of their punishment. This allowed for the continuation of this practice, while also ensuring that it was limited to individuals who had been convicted of crimes and were serving a sentence in prison.
Overall, the 13th Amendment's exception for punishment for a crime was included in the amendment in order to recognize the existing practice of requiring individuals who had been convicted of crimes to perform labor as part of their punishment, while also prohibiting slavery and involuntary servitude in other contexts.
I am still to establish why the US government would continue using forced servitude and how they still owe reparations for the current prisoners still in prisons today,
- Prisoners are "slaves of the state" - Refuted argument
- Forced Labor is slavery. - Refuted argument
Instigator's main ideas:
- Prisoners are "slaves of the state" - Refuted argument
- Forced Labor is slavery. - Refuted argument
Your second point's basis is flawed. You are mistaking human trafficking and slavery to be the same;
However, these bullet point shown above are not my main ideas.
Some people are under the impression that oppression of blacks just doesn't exist.
Initially, states passed discriminatory laws to arrest and imprison large numbers of Black people, then leased prisoners to private individuals and corporations in a system of convict leasing that resulted in dangerous conditions, abuse, and death. While states profited, prisoners earned no pay and faced inhumane, hazardous, and often deadly work conditions. Thousands of Black people were forced into a brutal system that historians have called “worse than death."
generating a conservative estimate of $11bn annually in goods and services while average wages range from 13 cents to 52 cents per hour.
40% of the U.S prison system are black. While blacks only represent 12. 2% of the total population of the U.S.
Intentionally cutting budgets to those neighborhoods. Intentionally driving the value of real estate in to the ground so that no business that hire will build. Limiting employment, education funding, limiting infrastructure, funding for parks and beautification almost to non existence.
it wasn't until Systema naturae in 1735, in which the Swedish naturalist Carl Linnaeus proposed a classification of humankind into four distinct races.
Therefore, reparations for false imprisonment, defamation of character, lynchings, unjust killings, led in the water, etc.... are still owed to them.
- Reparations would be impractical or impossible to implement, given the difficulty of identifying and compensating all the descendants of enslaved people.
- Reparations would be unfair, as many people who are alive today had no involvement in slavery or racism and should not be held responsible for the actions of their ancestors.
- Reparations would be divisive, as they would create resentment and conflict among different racial and ethnic groups.
- Reparations would not address the underlying problems of racism and inequality, and would therefore be ineffective in achieving justice for Black people.
- Reparations would be a waste of money, as the funds could be better spent on other initiatives that would benefit all members of society.
- Prisoners are "slaves of the state" - Refuted argument
- Forced Labor is slavery. - Refuted argument
- Discrimination affects lives of African-American - Refuted Argument
- Zoning laws are intentionally made to put African-Americans at a disadvantage - Refuted Argument
- Reparations are still owed to African-Americans - Refuted Argument
This much talking about a debate is fine. The only problem is when people intentionally harass voters.
The preciseness of the resolution made it hard to uphold. You needed both to support that slavery is still legal (you indeed showed a loophole), and that specifically African Americans somehow prove that. To this, pro was able to cast sufficient doubt that they are slaves today.
A debate just on if African Americans were still used as slaves by the prison system in the 20th century, you would have plenty of historical cases to cite (particularly proven wrongful imprisonments).
https://info.debateart.com/style-guide#writing-a-strong-resolution
...
As for the treatment of African Americans by our justice system: It is utterly deplorable.
Sadly, many Americans fall into the fallacious thinking that because the justice system abuses them, they must deserve it. A video of a cop literally murdering someone isn't enough to sway that type of person.
https://www.debateart.com/debates/3415-derek-chauvin-was-not-a-racist
This is my second debate, so I don't know what the etiquette is on commenting after arguments become closed. I accept the results based on the arguments given, and want my post comment to be inadmissible, and not considered evidence in this debate. However, after the debate was over, I came across a term I was unaware of. "Punitive Labour" this term describes labour as a punishment for a crime more accurately than "slavery" does. Both pro and con made the arguments that the prison system today is not like slavery that implies ownership over another person. My point, keeping the the 13th Amendment as is, is technically keeping slavery legal. The intention of the word "except", not only has the direct intention of making slavery legal, but implies that the institution now owns you if you commit a crime, regardless of race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, or religion. That is the unintended consequence of the exception clause in the 13th amendment. There are 3 words both the pro and con agree on definition.
Slavery: ownership.
Except: Accepting when conditions met.
Punitive Labour: Work as a punishment for a crime.
If we can agree on these terms being defined accurately. Then we must agree with the premise that slavery is still legal is established and proven.
My intention is not to win a debate or save face. Instead I feel strongly about the issue. I believe that in my heart the exception clause is why the massive disparity of blacks being incarcerated 5 times the rate of white in the U.S even though they represent a sliver of the population. 12.2 %, which is the reason for intentional impoverishment, segregation, crack being distributed by the CIA, the incredible increase in heroine sales during Vietnam, the L.A Riots etc... The prison system is extremely profitable for a handful of people.
I just finished my first debate. I think I won because my opponent forfeited round 3 and 4. It's still up for votes if your interested. My opponent has a win % 94 in 77 debates.
The first debate I initiated on one of these sites, was on if prison is more voluntary than not. The jokes I used haven’t aged well.
To be fair, I can see how Pro can pull a kritik that may decimate the topic itself, just maybe not the mainstream view of the topic.
I was more thinking someone would pull one on you.
I think i should further familiarize myself with concept of Kritik. But I believe that what the term is referring to is that my argument somehow will lead down a rabbit holes of it's no conclusions or even the old blame it on Canada technique. However I'm quite certain that my arguments and conclusion could be proven in court. I'm actually counting on it.
Ah, the old prisoners are slaves argument. Expect a kritik.
https://info.debateart.com/kritik-guide